I never heard grandpa Koch complain when he wanted ties with the USSR so he could frack the oil fields for Stalin..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I never heard grandpa Koch complain when he wanted ties with the USSR so he could frack the oil fields for Stalin..
You are the one that brought up recognition of the USSR during FDR, to gain admission for US companies to trade with...Not I...Are you a little groggy from all the cut-n-paste jobs??I never heard grandpa Koch complain when he wanted ties with the USSR so he could frack the oil fields for Stalin..
Sooo.....an attempt by the well-known gum-flapping fool to change the topic???
So sorry....no can do.
You are the one that brought up recognition of the USSR during FDR, to gain admission for US companies to trade with...Not I...Are you a little groggy from all the cut-n-paste jobs??I never heard grandpa Koch complain when he wanted ties with the USSR so he could frack the oil fields for Stalin..
Sooo.....an attempt by the well-known gum-flapping fool to change the topic???
So sorry....no can do.
It was only because Rooseveldt died that America was able to win World War II.
NEWSFLASH PoliSpice!!! MURICA is a plutocracy you dummy....and why Democrats celebrate that devolution.
1. Under discussion was the Virginia Plan..
"On May 29, 1787, Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph proposed what became known as "The Virginia Plan." Written primarily by fellow Virginian James Madison, the plan traced the broad outlines of what would become the U.S. Constitution: a national government consisting of three branches with checks and balances to prevent the abuse of power. In its amended form, this page of Madison's plan shows his ideas for a legislature. It describes 2 houses: one with members elected by the people for 3-year terms and the other composed of older leaders elected by the state legislatures for 7-year terms. Both would use population as a basis for dividing seats among the states."
Our Documents - Virginia Plan (1787)
On this, Madisonians were adamant: America could not have a king.
2. Alexander Hamilton rose to give a six-hour lecture to the assembled in Philadelphia championing a view that left the assembly aghast!
".... my own ideas are so materially dissimilar to the plans now before the committee. ... no amendment of the confederation can answer the purpose of a good government, so long as state sovereignties do, in any shape, exist; .... I believe the British government forms the best model the world ever produced,.... you cannot have a good executive upon a democratic plan. See the excellency of the British executive. He is placed above temptation. He can have no distinct interests from the public welfare. Nothing short of such an executive can be efficient. an executive is less dangerous to the liberties of the people when in office during life, than for seven years. It may be said, this constitutes an elective monarchy..."
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0098-0004
a. "In a testament to their belief that men are able to govern themselves, that Congress should be the strongest branch of government , that a government of limited powers provides the best protection of individual liberty, the delegates were so dismissive of Hamilton's proposal that they declined even to debate it."
Mike Lee, 'Our Lost Constitution," p. 58
3. This lesson from history frames the question to be asked by all Americans today. The answer should dictate one's views of contemporary history.
Think it over:
An 'elected monarch' or a limited constitutional government?
Which do you choose for America??
There are, in fact, millions who favor Hamilton's view. They are Liberals, Democrats, Fascists, Communists, Progressives, Socialists and Nazis.
They are not Americans.
But....under the 'perfect storm' of economic upheaval....all of that changed: Hamilton would have been filled with glee!
Coming right up.
I have suggested to Chic a number of times that she forward her anti-FDR evidence to the historians that rate the presidents. As we approach the end of Obama's term in office the nation's top historians will again rate all the presidents including FDR, The historians have never rated FDR below third best and in the last, rating rated FDR as America's best president. ]It was only because Rooseveldt died that America was able to win World War II.
I differ with that view: although he refused to honor his promise to help defeat Japan, Stalin would have continued to 'guide' America's military, as he did during the war, using American troops to end any chance Japan would stand in the way of his control in the Far East.
He led FDR by the nose, and certainly wished to see Japan defeated.
BTW....have you read "Sacred Secrets: How Soviet Intelligence Operations Changed American History," by Leona Schecter and Jerrold Schecter?
" Amongst the myriad twists and turns and subplots of World War II was the amazing efficiency with which Soviet agents in the U.S., Japan, and elsewhere around the globe coordinated to steer the imperial Japanese government away from an attack on the Soviet Union – a multi-year effort that resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.....
...Richard Sorge was arrested in Tokyo in 1941 by the Japanese police, he had just informed Soviet dictator Josef Stalin that Japan was planning to attack Pearl Harbor. Thus was the culmination of a years-long operation directed by the Soviet Union wherein the ultimate weapon was influence(there's that word again).
The Sorge spy ring achieved success in steering Japan away from its previously considered plan to attack the Soviet Union, and instead to turn its fire on another target which turned out to be the United States."
The role of Soviet agents in the Pearl Harbor attack
I have suggested to Chic a number of times that she forward her anti-FDR evidence to the historians that rate the presidents. As we approach the end of Obama's term in office the nation's top historians will again rate all the presidents including FDR, The historians have never rated FDR below third best and in the last, rating rated FDR as America's best president. ]It was only because Rooseveldt died that America was able to win World War II.
I differ with that view: although he refused to honor his promise to help defeat Japan, Stalin would have continued to 'guide' America's military, as he did during the war, using American troops to end any chance Japan would stand in the way of his control in the Far East.
He led FDR by the nose, and certainly wished to see Japan defeated.
BTW....have you read "Sacred Secrets: How Soviet Intelligence Operations Changed American History," by Leona Schecter and Jerrold Schecter?
" Amongst the myriad twists and turns and subplots of World War II was the amazing efficiency with which Soviet agents in the U.S., Japan, and elsewhere around the globe coordinated to steer the imperial Japanese government away from an attack on the Soviet Union – a multi-year effort that resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.....
...Richard Sorge was arrested in Tokyo in 1941 by the Japanese police, he had just informed Soviet dictator Josef Stalin that Japan was planning to attack Pearl Harbor. Thus was the culmination of a years-long operation directed by the Soviet Union wherein the ultimate weapon was influence(there's that word again).
The Sorge spy ring achieved success in steering Japan away from its previously considered plan to attack the Soviet Union, and instead to turn its fire on another target which turned out to be the United States."
The role of Soviet agents in the Pearl Harbor attack
Without Chic's evidence they just might rate him that high again.
I read somewhere a long time ago that some of Washington's officers wanted to make him King, but he refused.
FDR had not spent the previous decade fighting a war of Independence...or he probably would have made it only two terms...Washington was sick during his presidency, with malaria and dysentery..Which also was a reason for only two terms...
There was no term limits in the Constitution at that time...FDR had not spent the previous decade fighting a war of Independence...or he probably would have made it only two terms...Washington was sick during his presidency, with malaria and dysentery..Which also was a reason for only two terms...
Thank you for your attempt to compare apples and aardvarks.
I can always count on you for some intellectual non sequitur.
The difference had nothing to do with any war, nor with health, you dunce.
The first President was a man of character who honored the Constitution.
The 32nd President honored Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler.
" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48
There was no term limits in the Constitution at that time...FDR had not spent the previous decade fighting a war of Independence...or he probably would have made it only two terms...Washington was sick during his presidency, with malaria and dysentery..Which also was a reason for only two terms...
Thank you for your attempt to compare apples and aardvarks.
I can always count on you for some intellectual non sequitur.
The difference had nothing to do with any war, nor with health, you dunce.
The first President was a man of character who honored the Constitution.
The 32nd President honored Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler.
" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48
Hardly so, if the will of the people dictate the election...There was no term limits in the Constitution at that time...FDR had not spent the previous decade fighting a war of Independence...or he probably would have made it only two terms...Washington was sick during his presidency, with malaria and dysentery..Which also was a reason for only two terms...
Thank you for your attempt to compare apples and aardvarks.
I can always count on you for some intellectual non sequitur.
The difference had nothing to do with any war, nor with health, you dunce.
The first President was a man of character who honored the Constitution.
The 32nd President honored Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler.
" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48
Another 'swing and a miss.'
They were unnecessary unless the candidate imagined he was a king....or a dictator.
" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
I am sure the Pols, French, Czechs and Slavs would like to believe that, along with the Jews, gays, dissenters and mental and physical handicapped people of Germany..
Hardly so, if the will of the people dictate the election...There was no term limits in the Constitution at that time...FDR had not spent the previous decade fighting a war of Independence...or he probably would have made it only two terms...Washington was sick during his presidency, with malaria and dysentery..Which also was a reason for only two terms...
Thank you for your attempt to compare apples and aardvarks.
I can always count on you for some intellectual non sequitur.
The difference had nothing to do with any war, nor with health, you dunce.
The first President was a man of character who honored the Constitution.
The 32nd President honored Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler.
" Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48
Another 'swing and a miss.'
They were unnecessary unless the candidate imagined he was a king....or a dictator.
Hitler wasn't in power in the 1920's.." Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to•the Soviet Union."
I am sure the Pols, French, Czechs and Slavs would like to believe that, along with the Jews, gays, dissenters and mental and physical handicapped people of Germany..
Just imagine if you actually had either an education or a brain.
"American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.
“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin, ...."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks
You are the explanation as to why one rarely finds educated folks on the Left.