Homeowner shoots, kills alleged intruder, with his own gun

[JoeBlam]

The way I see it I have a door with 2 deadbolts an alarm with a ridiculously loud siren, and 2 dogs that will be barking their heads off if the fucker trying to get in doesn't take the hint he gets a chest full of buckshot.

Yeah, if he hasn't taken the hint by then he wants to sucide by homeowner. He has to be inside though....even if it's only his foot on the floor climbing through a window. I'm in the alarm-desgin business and have seen some pretty gruesome mornings-after. It's the crash-ins that usually end up in a homicide. Normally 2-3 hispanics or blacks, armed with pistols/shotguns. You can't win that fight unless you've got a pump-12 and are behind ample cover. I got a Mossy 500 pump for such an occasion...5 in the magzine and one in the snout. Remember you can load through your ejector-port if speed is off the essence and I keep the shells in my stock wrap, primer-side DOWN...you'll find in a bottom-loader like a Mossberg, you'll be less apt to drop a shell that way.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

 

[daveman]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

You're assuming the dead dumbass had weapons training. Why?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

What happened here is you have a guy who didnt want to use his weapon.
Thats why it got taken away from him.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

You're assuming the dead dumbass had weapons training. Why?

so are you assuming the unarmed home owner did?

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

What happened here is you have a guy who didnt want to use his weapon.
Thats why it got taken away from him.

So A 24 year old kindergarden teacher would?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

What happened here is you have a guy who didnt want to use his weapon.
Thats why it got taken away from him.

So A 24 year old kindergarden teacher would?

I dont know,you'd have to ask him.
But I do know you wouldnt get anywhere close to me if I had a weapon and the desire to use it.
The crook wasnt prepared to shoot someone obviously. Maybe he didnt want a murder charge added to his armed robbery charge.

 

[daveman]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

You're assuming the dead dumbass had weapons training. Why?

so are you assuming the unarmed home owner did?

Which one of them put a round in the ten-ring in a very stressful situation?

 

[Wyatt earp]

What happened here is you have a guy who didnt want to use his weapon.
Thats why it got taken away from him.

So A 24 year old kindergarden teacher would?

I dont know,you'd have to ask him.
But I do know you wouldnt get anywhere close to me if I had a weapon and the desire to use it.
The crook wasnt prepared to shoot someone obviously. Maybe he didnt want a murder charge added to his armed robbery charge.

Again I said it would be have to be on a case like case basis... like Joe blam reffered too and Clint said in Unforgiven~"It's a hell of a thing, killing a man. Take away all he's got and all he's ever gonna have".

 

[M14 Shooter]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

But allowing teachers that want one to have one is not.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

But allowing teachers that want one to have one is not.

good point considering it is a felony to have a gun in a gun free zone I think? if I read the law right..even if you have a CWP...

 

[eflatminor]

...it is a felony to have a gun in a gun free zone...

And that didn't stop the crazy fuck in Sandyhook?

Color me shocked...

 

[JoeBlam]

Regardless of all this noise from you gun-grabbers, in EVERY case of mass-shootings, a single armed citizen could have stopped it or at least had a chance to stop it. Homicidal maniacs choose scenarios they believe to be defenseless....we are so tired of telling you this time and time again but then it's like most of the garbage libs believe..."yeah but what if?".....there is no alternative to people defending themselves, PERIOD.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I think you all lost the point of why I posted this.....
1. A guy had a gun it didnt save him
2. A guy didnt have a gun, and killed the guy with the gun with the guys OWN gun...
3. Thinking your safe by packing a gun is only on a case by case basis...It gives you a false sense of security..
4. Putting guns in the hands of teachers to solve a problem is a bad idea...

But allowing teachers that want one to have one is not.

good point considering it is a felony to have a gun in a gun free zone I think? if I read the law right..even if you have a CWP...

Depends on the state and the school district.
Some states allow school districts to choose if they want to allow the teachers to have guns.