Hobby Lobby, Cakes, Photos & Marriage Itself: Foreshadowing?

[Quantum Windbag]

If you go down that road I suppose at the end of the road states will be able to outlaw gay couples period.

But that goes against the constitution.

As does allowing a corporation more rights than individuals.

Quite a sticky mess these con judges have shat out.

What rights do corporations have that you don't?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Perhaps Christians should read the First Amendment and realize that the same law which grants you protection from the government also grants the government protection from you.

Silly religious caveman beliefs of magical flying people in the clouds might be fun for three-year-olds, but grown adults should be able to decipher bullshit from reality.

As long as there is a First Amendment to the US Constitution, gay marriage will be legal because religion does not make our laws. The Supreme Court is doing its best to remove that barrier, though.

What the fuck? How fucking stupid can one person be? Are you fucking aware that not a single decision supporting same sex marriage even remotely cited the 1st Amendment?

 

[Silhouette]

Perhaps Christians should read the First Amendment and realize that the same law which grants you protection from the government also grants the government protection from you.

Silly religious caveman beliefs of magical flying people in the clouds might be fun for three-year-olds, but grown adults should be able to decipher bullshit from reality.

As long as there is a First Amendment to the US Constitution, gay marriage will be legal because religion does not make our laws. The Supreme Court is doing its best to remove that barrier, though.

What the fuck? How fucking stupid can one person be? Are you fucking aware that not a single decision supporting same sex marriage even remotely cited the 1st Amendment?

The US Supreme Court will weigh the LGBT cult next to the 14th and find that if they grant just that little limited group of 'special sexually deviant behaviors" umbrella under it, they cannot arbitrarily deny other 'special sexually deviant behaviors' either. Nor can they deny any behaviors that want to glom together under some similar compulsions, objectionable to the majority, as "a new class of people"...

Behaviors are going to be the crux of the discussion as to the 14th. And the fat lady has not sung on that account. You may have heard of the highly-discriminatory penal and civil law systems we have governing majority-rule over behaviors? Even if there's 1,000 activist-judges refusing to read Windsor before they rule on lower challenges in violation of state's sovereign rights to govern themselves on the question of non "one man and one woman" marriages, the final say will be the SCOTUS. And that hasn't happened yet. Might want to read 2013 Windsor Opinion before it does if you want a foreshadow. Oh and also the Hobby Lobby case. 2/3rds of Utah voted against non "one man/one woman" marriages.

 

[Silhouette]

Another thing we have that's kind of interesting here is a little bit of hypocrisy showing in the poll results and many of the responses.

The same group who think that LGBT marriage won't necessarily = polygamy marriage are the ones who freaked the hell out on the Hobby Lobby decision. And why? Because their logic was that once the precedent for denying abortion pills was set...denying birth control altogether was sure to follow.

You know, from the "same or similar" precedent...

 

[Silhouette]

It's a done deal or for the less ignorant lefties, a moot point. SCOTUS ruled that companies have the right to religious freedom just like individuals. Live with it.

What do you think the outfall for the appeal of the cult of LGBT vs Utah will be with respect to what you just said?