Hey, Let's Seceede Or Start a Revolution... Said the Left in 2005

[bodecea]

Bill Ayers is a mover and shaker in the democrat party and he should be sharing a cell with Charlie Manson. Both Manson and Ayers were (are?) advocates of the violent overthrow of the Country. You can include John Kerry and his one time partner (Hanoi) Jane Fonda when they created their phony "winter soldiers" project which was designed to bring racial unrest together with the anti-war movement and create a revolution.

Didn't the Feds have an opportunity to try and convict Ayers?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Yes what I worked for, but you're getting those monthly guberment checks with the EBT card.

I have never received a government check outside of tax refunds when I was young.

You fail.

IN my opinion and how you defend obama you LIE.

Say what? In your opinion, I have lied to you about the source of my income? In your opinion, I am a welfare recipient? Is that what you are going with?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I have never received a government check outside of tax refunds when I was young.

You fail.

IN my opinion and how you defend obama you LIE.

Say what? In your opinion, I have lied to you about the source of my income? In your opinion, I am a welfare recipient? Is that what you are going with?

your words and defense of obama gives you away.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I'll make a deal with you: If you never blame Bush or the previous administration on this board again I will too.

Which is relevant?

Bush fucked up royally. History will blame Bush. You are welcome to blame Obama and will be reminded that he did not start with a clean slate

However, bullshit about secession, birth certificates, golf, socialism are all owned by the right

By the way, your flag is upside down

No obama did not start with a clean slate, he started with what he and the democrats did when THEY controlled congress, What better way to win the white house then create a mess with a Republican as president.

Written with the aid of the "Revised History of the United States", published by the Ministry of Truth and edited by Karl Rove with an introducton by Tom Delay.

 

[Billo_Really]

Here's what you said nutter

Obviously, in the case of SCOTUS, "control" doesn't equal "run by".

You're going off on a tangent here and getting away from the point I was making, that for at least 6 years, republican's could enact virtually any legislation they wanted, the President would automatically sign it and SCOTUS would not overturn it. Which means, for that period of time, republican's were completely responsible for everything that the government did and there's no way you can scapegoat that onto others.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Which is relevant?

Bush fucked up royally. History will blame Bush. You are welcome to blame Obama and will be reminded that he did not start with a clean slate

However, bullshit about secession, birth certificates, golf, socialism are all owned by the right

By the way, your flag is upside down

No obama did not start with a clean slate, he started with what he and the democrats did when THEY controlled congress, What better way to win the white house then create a mess with a Republican as president.

Written with the aid of the "Revised History of the United States", published by the Ministry of Truth and edited by Karl Rove with an introducton by Tom Delay.

You can't deflect from history the democrats have controlled the government in part or whole for 60+ years since 1946.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here's what you said nutter

What exactly happened the first six years, that the democrats didn't compound too and make worse?

A republican controlled Congress, Presidency and SCOTUS.

That is about as complete absolute power gets in this country short of a dictatorship.

How did you get to be so irresponsible that you refuse to be held accountable for your own actions?

Obviously, in the case of SCOTUS, "control" doesn't equal "run by".

You're going off on a tangent here and getting away from the point I was making, that for at least 6 years, republican's could enact virtually any legislation they wanted, the President would automatically sign it and SCOTUS would not overturn it. Which means, for that period of time, republican's were completely responsible for everything that the government did and there's no way you can scapegoat that onto others.

A republican controlled Congress, Presidency and SCOTUS

 

[JakeStarkey]

Wrong in that I am a liar or a liberal, and right in that you have lived for a good part of your life off the government teat.

bigrebn is the ultimate nutter.

jake starkey is a lying liberal but that information is nothing new.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

wrong in that i am a liar or a liberal, and right in that you have lived for a good part of your life off the government teat.

bigrebn is the ultimate nutter.

jake starkey is a lying liberal but that information is nothing new.

jake lies even when he said he was a liberal.

you are right: You are nothing new, just acting like the obamaphonelady.

bigrebnc is the extremist equivalent to obamaphonelady: Can only react and emote, can't think

liberal defending a liberal nothing new

 

[francoHFW]

Dems caused the Bush depression and everyone for Obama is on welfare? Right off the wall. LOL hater/dupe...

 

[LoneLaugher]

IN my opinion and how you defend obama you LIE.

Say what? In your opinion, I have lied to you about the source of my income? In your opinion, I am a welfare recipient? Is that what you are going with?

your words and defense of obama gives you away.

Let's explore this, shall we?

My words and my defense of Obama give me away as a person who receives government assistance?

What words?

Am I completely dependent on the government? Just partially so?

I am going to give you something to work with. If you can understand this, I will agree to refrain from mocking you for a week.

watakushi ga sen kyuu hyaku hachi jyuu hachi nen kara ima made... nihonsei no kaabaido ya daiyamondo no kattaa wo yunyuushiteimasu.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Say what? In your opinion, I have lied to you about the source of my income? In your opinion, I am a welfare recipient? Is that what you are going with?

your words and defense of obama gives you away.

Let's explore this, shall we?

My words and my defense of Obama give me away as a person who receives government assistance?

What words?

Am I completely dependent on the government? Just partially so?

I am going to give you something to work with. If you can understand this, I will agree to refrain from mocking you for a week.

watakushi ga sen kyuu hyaku hachi jyuu hachi nen kara ima made... nihonsei no kaabaido ya daiyamondo no kattaa wo yunyuushiteimasu.

Ass hat I really don't care what you do, your mocking of me doesn't change any facts that I use it just makes you look idiotic

 

[LoneLaugher]

You have used facts to make me look idiotic?

You mean like your opinion that I am on public assistance based on my support for President Obama?

Like your complaining about government spending while YOU collect government checks?

I mock you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You have used facts to make me look idiotic?

You mean like your opinion that I am on public assistance based on my support for President Obama?

Like your complaining about government spending while YOU collect government checks?

I mock you.

What exactly have you added to this thread? not one damn thing

 

[LoneLaugher]

I am mocking you. The thread is bullshit and not worth my time. Mocking you, however, is suitable activity for a lazy Sunday afternoon.

You still getting getting government checks? Would you like to take this opportunity to thank me for my contribution to your livelihood?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am mocking you. The thread is bullshit and not worth my time. Mocking you, however, is suitable activity for a lazy Sunday afternoon.

You still getting getting government checks? Would you like to take this opportunity to thank me for my contribution to your livelihood?

stupid little boys always think they are mocking someone
Keep doing what you do it makes me relevant.

 

[KGB]

How in the hell did Republicans control the supreme court?

When they stopped the Florida recount.

the Constitution stopped the recount....

 

[KGB]

No you're a nutter that thinks the supreme court was Republican.

When you stop a legal recount and declare a republican president, they're certainly not democrats.

What other conclusions are there?

Aside from the ones you make up.

see, that's the issue right there. It wasn't a legal recount. It was a farce set up by an overstepping state supreme court that had no jurisdiction in which to rule in the first place. The SCOTUS rightfully stopped the shenanigans that Al Gore was spreading....

 

[LoneLaugher]

I am mocking you. The thread is bullshit and not worth my time. Mocking you, however, is suitable activity for a lazy Sunday afternoon.

You still getting getting government checks? Would you like to take this opportunity to thank me for my contribution to your livelihood?

stupid little boys always think they are mocking someone
Keep doing what you do it makes me relevant.

You ave finally figured it out. Congratulations.

 

[hazlnut]

Hey, Let's Seceede Or Start a Revolution... Said the Left in 2005​

—Ace
Ace of Spades HQ

This is a good point: Although liberals are laughing at conservatives' frustrations and the very human responses to it, they themselves experienced similar frustrations, and had similar responses to them, after Bush's reelection.

This is an important point: 96% of the reason conservatives are viewed as "weird" or "extreme" or what-have-you is that the media, controlled by the left, covers-up/embargoes their own excesses (and, when forced to report upon such excesses, supply a lot of "context" which justifies these excesses), but of course loves reporting similar conservative statements (without any justifying "context," needless to say).

It hardly needs to be said, at least on the right, that Jonathan Chait was not pilloried as a "hater" for his infamous "Why I Hate George W. Bush" column. Instead, it was celebrated -- among the left, I mean; they didn't broadly report it to the general public -- for how it so daringly captured the real feeling of the left.

Needless to say my own "Why I Hate Barack Hussein Obama" column would not be celebrated as "daring," "honest," "bracing," or "cathartic." It would be a hate crime and a symptom of possibly dangerous impulses.

This is what I hate more than anything else: the hypocrisy, the division of citizens into two classes, the Privileged Class, which has a broad license and range of liberty, and the Disfavored Underclass, whose liberty is sharply restricted.......

You fringe righties work so hard at failing.