Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Having the ability to engage in armed insurrection is not the same as advocating for it. See the difference?The Constitution has no provision for an armed insurrection by civiliansThe country didn't decide that, quite the opposite. 17 states passed defense of marriage by popular vote. The dictatorship of the Judiciary shit all over the will of the people and dictated law in favor homosexual marriage.
You really are quite stupid.
The ONLY way you fascists will get the law you desire is if the dictatorship of the judiciary creates law out of thin air again. Doubtful with the current court.
You can describe it any silly way you want, but just be ready for it to happen.
The free world calls that a TYRANNY and a COUP. The Constitution provides a remedy for that.
View attachment 279910
View attachment 279911
They had a better idea....the vote
The Constitution was the result of an armed insurrection against the Crown. No one is talking about an armed insurrection by civilians, is that what your Neo-Marxist programmers put into your head?
That's what RWNJs and Trump supporters advocate here every day.
.