Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so the doctor is now a man trapped in a womans body...am i right joe?
Sorry, you are wrong...that is exactly what they did.....the main cast of the original Star Wars were all ruined in the last movie...all to make the new, weaker, SJW female characters take the lead....
Who is Shazam?
You mean a lesser qualified womanSorry, you are wrong...that is exactly what they did.....the main cast of the original Star Wars were all ruined in the last movie...all to make the new, weaker, SJW female characters take the lead....
The last Star Wars had a lot of problems, but not because of female characters. I am noticing that the same people who hate on the female characters in various TV shows are the same ones who voted in the crazy game show host rather than a qualified woman.
Just saying.
So, this is a “whites only” movie?This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel...
So, this is a “whites only” movie?This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel...
Good to know.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What message are you claiming Captain Marvel is pushing?
That there are no differences in physical capability between men and women. This is an expensive and potentially dangerous fantasy when applied to police, fire, military and construction activities.
You guy's do realize you are arguing about fictional characters right?
At least argue about if Green Lantern can ever recover from the Ryan Reynolds version.You guy's do realize you are arguing about fictional characters right?
You take that back.
You aare clearly ignorant.This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel......how much damage has she done?
I checked out of the MCU a long time ago, but given how much the misogynistic right is losing their stuff over this gal, I might go out and see this movie.
The real problem is, of course, that the Carol Danvers' Captain Marvel is a relatively obscure character compared to Iron Man or Thor. She wasn't the only character to take the title, and it was only one of several identities she took on during her superhero career. (She was also known as Binary, Warbird and Ms. Marvel at various points... because comics.)
What i am seeing is that in the age of Trump, we have a new wave of toxic masculinity.. We can see how people reacted to The Last Jedi's female characters, Star Trek Discovery main character being a black woman, or the new Doctor Who being played by a woman.
(Yes, I'm totally down with a shape-changing dude who travels through time and space in a magic box and fights homicidal pepper-shakers with a screwdriver, but you turn him into a chick, and I'm out!!!!)
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
Ask brie Larson who it devastated you retardYou aare clearly ignorant.This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel......how much damage has she done?
I checked out of the MCU a long time ago, but given how much the misogynistic right is losing their stuff over this gal, I might go out and see this movie.
The real problem is, of course, that the Carol Danvers' Captain Marvel is a relatively obscure character compared to Iron Man or Thor. She wasn't the only character to take the title, and it was only one of several identities she took on during her superhero career. (She was also known as Binary, Warbird and Ms. Marvel at various points... because comics.)
What i am seeing is that in the age of Trump, we have a new wave of toxic masculinity.. We can see how people reacted to The Last Jedi's female characters, Star Trek Discovery main character being a black woman, or the new Doctor Who being played by a woman.
(Yes, I'm totally down with a shape-changing dude who travels through time and space in a magic box and fights homicidal pepper-shakers with a screwdriver, but you turn him into a chick, and I'm out!!!!)
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
It's a comic book character, dumb ass. How does it have more than a passing effect on anybody?
Brie Larson is a fictional character ?You guy's do realize you are arguing about fictional characters right?
You take that back.
Ask brie Larson who it devastated you retardYou aare clearly ignorant.This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel......how much damage has she done?
I checked out of the MCU a long time ago, but given how much the misogynistic right is losing their stuff over this gal, I might go out and see this movie.
The real problem is, of course, that the Carol Danvers' Captain Marvel is a relatively obscure character compared to Iron Man or Thor. She wasn't the only character to take the title, and it was only one of several identities she took on during her superhero career. (She was also known as Binary, Warbird and Ms. Marvel at various points... because comics.)
What i am seeing is that in the age of Trump, we have a new wave of toxic masculinity.. We can see how people reacted to The Last Jedi's female characters, Star Trek Discovery main character being a black woman, or the new Doctor Who being played by a woman.
(Yes, I'm totally down with a shape-changing dude who travels through time and space in a magic box and fights homicidal pepper-shakers with a screwdriver, but you turn him into a chick, and I'm out!!!!)
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
It's a comic book character, dumb ass. How does it have more than a passing effect on anybody?
You cared enough to post so go whine elsewhere snowflakeAsk brie Larson who it devastated you retardYou aare clearly ignorant.This video looks at Brie Larson and her attacks on the very fan base who Marvel wants to pay to see Captain Marvel......how much damage has she done?
I checked out of the MCU a long time ago, but given how much the misogynistic right is losing their stuff over this gal, I might go out and see this movie.
The real problem is, of course, that the Carol Danvers' Captain Marvel is a relatively obscure character compared to Iron Man or Thor. She wasn't the only character to take the title, and it was only one of several identities she took on during her superhero career. (She was also known as Binary, Warbird and Ms. Marvel at various points... because comics.)
What i am seeing is that in the age of Trump, we have a new wave of toxic masculinity.. We can see how people reacted to The Last Jedi's female characters, Star Trek Discovery main character being a black woman, or the new Doctor Who being played by a woman.
(Yes, I'm totally down with a shape-changing dude who travels through time and space in a magic box and fights homicidal pepper-shakers with a screwdriver, but you turn him into a chick, and I'm out!!!!)
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
It's a comic book character, dumb ass. How does it have more than a passing effect on anybody?
We'll put that on the list of things I might care about later if I get time.
You cared enough to post so go whine elsewhere snowflakeAsk brie Larson who it devastated you retardYou aare clearly ignorant.I checked out of the MCU a long time ago, but given how much the misogynistic right is losing their stuff over this gal, I might go out and see this movie.
The real problem is, of course, that the Carol Danvers' Captain Marvel is a relatively obscure character compared to Iron Man or Thor. She wasn't the only character to take the title, and it was only one of several identities she took on during her superhero career. (She was also known as Binary, Warbird and Ms. Marvel at various points... because comics.)
What i am seeing is that in the age of Trump, we have a new wave of toxic masculinity.. We can see how people reacted to The Last Jedi's female characters, Star Trek Discovery main character being a black woman, or the new Doctor Who being played by a woman.
(Yes, I'm totally down with a shape-changing dude who travels through time and space in a magic box and fights homicidal pepper-shakers with a screwdriver, but you turn him into a chick, and I'm out!!!!)
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
It's a comic book character, dumb ass. How does it have more than a passing effect on anybody?
We'll put that on the list of things I might care about later if I get time.
No you got butthurt and pitched a little hissy fit.You cared enough to post so go whine elsewhere snowflakeAsk brie Larson who it devastated you retardYou aare clearly ignorant.
Binary and warbird and Ms marvel were not different identities of Captain Marvel.
Carol Danvers adopted all of those aliases after she got her powers FROM Captain Marvel.
There was no toxic masculinity as you claim which is a fictional term anyways. The problem is Social Justice Warrior fools making a hash out of entertainment to make a feminist political statement.
One can have strong female leads and even replace male characters so long as it is done right and satisfies the fans. For proof of this simply check out the reboot of Battlestar Gallactica which replaced several male characters with female actors and even invented new female characters who were important to the story. The point was there was a little push back until the fans saw how they improved the story. It then became iconic and a fan favorite where no one cared about the gender of characters.
When people switch characters to make a political feminist point they lose focus and create bad stories which is why there was a backlash against the new star wars and star trek discovery. It was not misogyny it was boring stories which failed to deliver to the fans. This is why the last reboot of ghostbusters tanked and failed.
SJWs make these disasters then whine about misogyny when they fail .
The original star trek learned the hard way that the fans have to be made happy because that is who pays for the show or comic book or story. lying and whining about toxic masculinity is not an excuse for fucking over the fans and losing money as a result
It's a comic book character, dumb ass. How does it have more than a passing effect on anybody?
We'll put that on the list of things I might care about later if I get time.
I cared enough to comment on one of the silliest threads I've seen lately. How could I not?
