HAMAS planned MUCH larger terrorist attack than was conducted on 10/07 against innocent Israeli civilians


Hamas terrorists reportedly aimed to kill as many civilians as possible during their October 7 attack on Israel because they wanted to spark an intense military response from Israel in the hopes that it would draw the entire region into a war against Israel.

More than a dozen top intelligence officials from several Western and Middle Eastern nations told The Washington Post that based on what Israeli investigators have found in the aftermath of the attack that it was clear that Hamas terrorists were ordered to murder as many civilians as possible and that they had planned to push further into Israel, into its larger cities, during the attacks.
.
.
..
.
.
"More than a dozen top intelligence officials from several Western and Middle Eastern nations"

You can ALWAYS trust the INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY to tell the truth.
Scary.
 
What is this talk about "50 years???" 1920 - racist Arab rampage was more than a 100 years ago.
 
Fuck you, scumbag piece of shit.


I want everybody that visits this thread to go to the link I posted and tell me why Israel shouldn't kill every fucking piece of fucking shit in Gaza.

Watch the images of Gaza 'civilians' beating and lynching kidnapped Israeli civilians. Watch as those subhuman scum drive around with the dead, body of a beautiful young Israeli woman in the bed of their pickup shouting "God Is Great" over and over as they spit on her nude body.

Gaza and all the 'people' in it can be sent to Hell AFAIC. Not 'straight' to Hell. I want them to suffer first.

Hamas has been a useful tool of Israel since 1987. They prevent any 2 state solution. That's why Netanyahu supports Hamas with 1.5 billion dollars paid through Qatar.

This is a very ugly game they are playing to prevent a just peace.

Nothing has changed. The goals are the same as they were in1897.
 

At the time of the Basel congress, Arabs represented 95 percent of the population of Palestine and they owned 99 percent of the land.2 Thus it was obvious from the beginning of Zionism that dispossession of the Palestinian majority, either politically or physically, would be an inevitable requirement for achieving a Jewish state. It was not only land that was needed to reach Zionism's goal, but land without another people in the majority.

Since Palestinian Arabs were by far the majority throughout the period up to Israel's establishment as a Jewish state in 1948, the Zionist state could emerge only by denying the majority its rights or by becoming the majority either through immigration or in reducing the number of Palestinians by ethnic cleansing. There was no other way to create a Jewish, rather than democratic, state.3

That the Jewish state was secured in 1948 by the expulsion of the Palestinians should have come as no surprise. Expulsion as Zionism's logical imperative was clearly seen by Herzl as early as June 12, 1895. At the time he was still formulating his ideas about Zionism and confided to his diary: "We shall try to spirit the penniless population [Palestinians] across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."4 Even if this was perhaps the fanciful imagining of a rather romantic personality, as some sympathizers of Herzl contend, its essential imperative was inescapable. This was recognized by most early Zionists, as evidenced by the fact that the theme of expulsion consistently ran through Zionist thought from the very beginning.5

For instance, as early as 1905, Israel Zangwill, an organizer of Zionism in Britain and one of Zionism's top propagandists, who had coined the slogan "a land without a people for a people without a land," acknowledged in a speech in Manchester that Palestine was not a land without people. In fact, it was filled with Arabs: "[We] must be prepared either to drive out by the sword the [Arab] tribes in possession as our forefathers did or to grapple with the problem of a large alien population, mostly Mohammedan and accustomed for centuries to despise us."6 This comment came at a time when there were around 645,000 Muslims and Christians in Palestine and only 55,000 Jews, mainly non-Zionists or anti-Zionists in the Orthodox neighborhoods of Jerusalem and other cities.7

David Ben-Gurion, the man who along with Herzl and Chaim Weizmann was one of the progenitors of Israel, explicitly acknowledged the linkage between Zionism and expulsion: "Zionism is a transfer of the Jews. Regarding the transfer of the Arabs this is much easier than any other transfer."8 Or, as Israeli scholar Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi put it: "While the basic problem confronting Diaspora Jews was to survive as a minority, the basic problem of Zionism in Palestine was to dispossess the natives and become a majority."9

Much attention has been paid to how the early Zionists secured land in Palestine, but relatively little study has focused on the equally essential effort by Zionists to delegitimize and replace the Palestinian majority.10 Without Jewish control, the Zionists concluded they would be no better off than in Europe, where Zionism arose specifically as a way to escape antisemitism, pogroms, the ghetto and minority status.

Continued
 


 

At the time of the Basel congress, Arabs represented 95 percent of the population of Palestine and they owned 99 percent of the land.2 Thus it was obvious from the beginning of Zionism that dispossession of the Palestinian majority, either politically or physically, would be an inevitable requirement for achieving a Jewish state. It was not only land that was needed to reach Zionism's goal, but land without another people in the majority.

Since Palestinian Arabs were by far the majority throughout the period up to Israel's establishment as a Jewish state in 1948, the Zionist state could emerge only by denying the majority its rights or by becoming the majority either through immigration or in reducing the number of Palestinians by ethnic cleansing. There was no other way to create a Jewish, rather than democratic, state.3

That the Jewish state was secured in 1948 by the expulsion of the Palestinians should have come as no surprise. Expulsion as Zionism's logical imperative was clearly seen by Herzl as early as June 12, 1895. At the time he was still formulating his ideas about Zionism and confided to his diary: "We shall try to spirit the penniless population [Palestinians] across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly."4 Even if this was perhaps the fanciful imagining of a rather romantic personality, as some sympathizers of Herzl contend, its essential imperative was inescapable. This was recognized by most early Zionists, as evidenced by the fact that the theme of expulsion consistently ran through Zionist thought from the very beginning.5

For instance, as early as 1905, Israel Zangwill, an organizer of Zionism in Britain and one of Zionism's top propagandists, who had coined the slogan "a land without a people for a people without a land," acknowledged in a speech in Manchester that Palestine was not a land without people. In fact, it was filled with Arabs: "[We] must be prepared either to drive out by the sword the [Arab] tribes in possession as our forefathers did or to grapple with the problem of a large alien population, mostly Mohammedan and accustomed for centuries to despise us."6 This comment came at a time when there were around 645,000 Muslims and Christians in Palestine and only 55,000 Jews, mainly non-Zionists or anti-Zionists in the Orthodox neighborhoods of Jerusalem and other cities.7

David Ben-Gurion, the man who along with Herzl and Chaim Weizmann was one of the progenitors of Israel, explicitly acknowledged the linkage between Zionism and expulsion: "Zionism is a transfer of the Jews. Regarding the transfer of the Arabs this is much easier than any other transfer."8 Or, as Israeli scholar Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi put it: "While the basic problem confronting Diaspora Jews was to survive as a minority, the basic problem of Zionism in Palestine was to dispossess the natives and become a majority."9

Much attention has been paid to how the early Zionists secured land in Palestine, but relatively little study has focused on the equally essential effort by Zionists to delegitimize and replace the Palestinian majority.10 Without Jewish control, the Zionists concluded they would be no better off than in Europe, where Zionism arose specifically as a way to escape antisemitism, pogroms, the ghetto and minority status.

Continued
One lie after the other----to a large extent schooled by escaped nazi war criminals. I have a complimentary response----Muhummad and Jesus were nothing but HOMO LOVERS and they both screwed little boys.

For those interested in reality---read the NT----Jesus was a flaming ZIONIST. The statement "zionism arose in Europe" is a statement that is something like throwing shit in the face of JESUS and UTTERLY ISLAMO NAZI. Another interesting reality---the very old (pre-revolutionary war) white church with steeple in the town of my childhood was ANGLICAN (episcopalian) It was called FIRST ZION CHURCH OF CHRIST. In the islamo nazi literature I read as a child---1950s----in my Episcopalian founded town----the word ZIONIST was presented as PROFANE-----by the time I was 12---I decided that christians are very confused based on the bullshit they seemed to believe
 



Horrific.
 
bbbbbut. the PUPPIES!!

dimocraps are scum
based on the comments by such LUMINARIES as ERDOGAN and ALI
KHAMENEI it is clear that the operation
of Oct 7 was supposed to morph into
something like ARMAGEDDON for Israel. Based on how things went---It is obvous that it was a JOINT UMMAH ENTERPRISE.... and it 'ain't over yet
 
based on the comments by such LUMINARIES as ERDOGAN and ALI
KHAMENEI it is clear that the operation
of Oct 7 was supposed to morph into
something like ARMAGEDDON for Israel. Based on how things went---It is obvous that it was a JOINT UMMAH ENTERPRISE.... and it 'ain't over yet
muzzies always seem to over-estimate their abilities.

I understand that the IDF has lost around 50 KIA while Hamas has lost thousands of fighters and even more civilians.

muzzies are at their best when they're murdering, raping and torturing unarmed women and children. Against Men, against Warriors, they get their asses kicked. Bigly. Every time because -- They're not men. They are cowards, they are pretenders, they are wife-beating, boy-loving, pig-fucking cowards. The only time they like sex with women is when they rape them. Otherwise they prefer sex with boys. Young boys.

No wonder dimocrap scum like them so much
 
So that you have an idea about Surada's "knowledge. " He wrote, days ago, that the Muslim Brotherhood was founded as a "reaction" to Israel.🤣

Hasan Al Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in the mid 1920s and bit was in reaction to Zionism and Jewish Nationalism in Palestine.
 
muzzies always seem to over-estimate their abilities.

I understand that the IDF has lost around 50 KIA while Hamas has lost thousands of fighters and even more civilians.

muzzies are at their best when they're murdering, raping and torturing unarmed women and children. Against Men, against Warriors, they get their asses kicked. Bigly. Every time because -- They're not men. They are cowards, they are pretenders, they are wife-beating, boy-loving, pig-fucking cowards. The only time they like sex with women is when they rape them. Otherwise they prefer sex with boys. Young boys.

No wonder dimocrap scum like them so much
 

Forum List

Back
Top