Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #121
Chris says it's not the money of the one that earned it yet indicates it has to be taken from the earned to give to the non earner. She also goes on about how it's only x amount. Like most self proclaimed compassionate do nothings, she assumes it's about the amount.
It's about the wrong-wing notion of “charity”, by which she believes she can claim credit for being charitable by advocating that money be taken from someone else, and given to those that she thinks need it, rather than by willingly giving what is rightfully her own to give, in support of those she thinks in need of it.
She needs to read the definition of "charity". The key word in the definition is VOLUNTARY. Charity and compassion come from the willingness of the giver not supporting a mandate by the taker.
She seems to think that because something she supports isn't up to a certain level, those that don't support that particular things are at fault for not doing enough but those that do have no responsibility for not doing enough for what THEY support. She says that she helps when she can and how she can. Sounds like another that can't do things herself to the level she thinks they need to be done then believes supporting others to do what she can't do makes her compassionate.
I already said charitable donations are not enough. You must be a complete moron if you think charitable donations would support people and keep them off the streets.
What about a teen girl who gets pregnant, gets kicked out by her "Christian" parents, and because of your stupid policies, she can't get an abortion, she can't get healthcare, she can't get daycare vouchers, she is now homeless with a child. You people are sick. There's no getting around that fact.
I've already said that if you don't think they are, you're not doing enough. By you saying they're not enough and supporting mandates to make up the difference you don't like, you're saying that if someone doesn't do with what they've earned, it's OK to take it and make them. If someone that you think deserves something but I don't can't get it, it's not my fault they don't. It's yours. YOU think they deserve it.
I have an easy solution for your scenario. Let the sperm donor that got her pregnant support her and her child. You don't have a problem demanding people like me that didn't get her pregnant do something you won't force the one that did to do. That it's not my kid and someone else's is the only fact that matters. If the sperm donor can't and the girl is a minor, force her parents to do it. She's their child not mine. Here's the hierarchy for who should pay: 1) The girls and the sperm donor; 2) HER parents or the sperm donor's parents if he's a minor; 3) All you bleeding hearts, and somewhere way, way, way down the line so far it doesn't matter, the rest of us.
Look, that is not how things work in the real world all the time.
So that makes it right because you support doing the wrong thing?