- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 66,052
- 2,635
Still nothing from Zelenskyy, so you have nothing to back up your lies……as always.
LOL
You poor, desperate dumbfuck. I've got the news reporting it. Which shows I didn't lie.
Sucks to be you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still nothing from Zelenskyy, so you have nothing to back up your lies……as always.
I don't know. What normal person was on other side? Have you seen the pictures of those folks? Both sides were either all extreme or both sides had a mix.
Lucky for you that the owner of Burisma is in "hiding" in Monaco, but why on earth would he admit to hiring Hunter just for influence to keep from getting arrested? Common sense in this situation should prevail. Hunter wasn't sitting on the board of a Ukrainian company for any other reason than to provide influence. It's pretty obvious to anyone that is actually paying attention.
Amazing how Trump was the only one in his government that was trying to go after this supposed corruption. He had to do it all on his own by personally appealing to the president of Ukraine.
There was no investigation. Shokin was corrupt. Unfortunately so was the guy that Ukraine replaced him with.
I never said those folks were normal or not. But no normal person is going to support a rally of neonazis, KKK, & white supremacists.
Then Trump should have done it properly and had his Attorney General deal with Zelenskyy. Doing himself appeared to be in violation of §30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals; and led to his first impeachment.
There is no proclivity of the FBI to protect Democrats. For crying out loud, the director of the FBI is in the federalist society. Trump’s DoJ was entirely run by his own appointees and they wouldn’t touch it with a ten foot pole.Given the proclivity of the FBI and the CIA to protect the Democrat's and attack Trump, not amazing at all.
Hunter was hired for name recognition.Ask yourself this question. Why was Hunter hired by Burisma? Do you honestly not believe it was for political purposes? If so, do you really find it that hard to believe that Burisma would ask Hunter to provide them some cover? You do realize the "investigation" was completely shut down less than 1 year after Shokin was fired don't you? Did it ever occur to you that maybe Zlochevsky wanted Shokin fired so the investigation would stop and he could "flee" to Monaco? Yeah, no way any of that was possible, right?
Gullible much?Hunter was hired for name recognition
Says the guy that thinks the corrupt prosecutor was hot on the trial of Burisma because that corrupt prosecutor said so years after the fact and produced precisely zero evidence of any actual investigation.Gullible much?
No, the people that were involved know more than you or me and it doesn't look good for Hunter or Joe.Says the guy that thinks the corrupt prosecutor was hot on the trial of Burisma because that corrupt prosecutor said so years after the fact and produced precisely zero evidence of any actual investigation.
Name recognition is a thing. Having a Biden on the board could lend credibility and legitimacy to a company that had an image problem. It’s perfectly reasonable.
But maybe you know more about these things than people involved.
AP Interview: Ex-Polish president defends Biden and Burisma
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Aleksander Kwasniewski, a former Polish president who is on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, said Thursday that Hunter Biden was indeed chosen to join its advisory board because of his name.apnews.com
The people involved from the State Department in 2016 tell us that Shokin was a corrupt prosecutor who they wanted fired so they could help Ukraine be a more functional country.No, the people that were involved know more than you or me and it doesn't look good for Hunter or Joe.
And after Shokan was fired, the investigation ended less than a year later. That should tell you something.The people involved from the State Department in 2016 tell us that Shokin was a corrupt prosecutor who they wanted fired so they could help Ukraine be a more functional country.
The people involved from the anticorruption department in Ukraine tell us that there was no investigation into Burisma, it existed on paper only with no actual investigation taking place.
Sorry, but your story just doesn't make sense based on facts.
It doesn’t. The investigation only existed on paper.And after Shokan was fired, the investigation ended less than a year later. That should tell you something.
I believe some were there to protest the removal of the statue, not to affirm the beliefs of those groups.
The impeachment was nothing but a political sham. He was not removed from office for good reason.
You got the news saying he didn't show up, nothing more, Stupid.
And after Shokan was fired, the investigation ended less than a year later. That should tell you something.
Exactly. All you have is a scheduled interview that never happened, Stupid.LOL
Poor Dumbfuck. Too illiterate to comprehend the article stated Zelenskyy was scheduled to be interviewed on CNN.
Exactly. All you have is a scheduled interview that never happened, Stupid.
Thanks for once again confirming you lied, liar.