GOP Lawmaker Wants To End Higher Education To ‘Save America’ From Liberals

[ABikerSailor]

You know, it's all well and good to talk about college, but the places where we need people for jobs in this country is in the trades. An electrician, plumber or carpenter all make pretty decent money these days.

 

[miketx]

Yeah, because having no doctors, no engineers, no teachers, and no lawyers will make us such a great country, right?

It always amazes me when elected officials fear elections.

He doesn't fear elections he fears insane deranged progressive, as he should.

 

[Zorro!]

You know, it's all well and good to talk about college, but the places where we need people for jobs in this country is in the trades. An electrician, plumber or carpenter all make pretty decent money these days.

They make great money.

 

[beautress]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

 

[BULLDOG]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

 

[beautress]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”



They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education is the greatest enemy of modern American conservatism. So not surprised.

That's not true. The billy sticks of humiliation are the enemy, and they're being used by order of someone in the school systems of university against students, whether by professors, Democrat speakers inciting violence on conservatives, and out-and-out omission of stopping the hate against conservatives on Democrat brainwashing institutions. The assholes who allow this crap to go on in universities are not going to have problems with DC funding them. Universities are to present facts, not cram dark and sinister political isolation of Republicans down people's throats by Democrat professors who have a stranglehold on Ivy League history departments, which has been a DNC goal for decades. It's unfair and teaches bullying to get what you want. That goes against what America stands for.

You haven't dug deep enough.

Yes I have. You did not go to my thread. Secrecy: Why are Democrats Going After Trump Again Omerta style? I worked quite diligently off getting information out to the lefties who were pilloring the daylights out of me for being a messenger yesterday. A couple of folks dropped by, but they're not interested in the illegal modus operandi being used against the president and the goalpost moving that's going on in a pandemic way in this country. Please drop by and then analyze how deep I've dug to have little to no response. Fortunately, I've been posting conservative since 1996. I've been posting in favor of some of the best scholars and innovators ever elected by the American people, only to watch the smarmers in the DNC make short work of their integrity, intelligence, good deeds, hurculean strides in environmental issues based on traditional science and not pseudo disproven theory. Today, I worked on bringing our loyal opposition to see their self-defeating Socialist demigods lie their way into the hearts of the unchary beginning with university level brainwashing that results in an antifa to Attorney General Barr's evidence of preplanned and intentional wrongdoing at the highest levels of the Democrat Socialist movement.

Thank you for a good thread.

 

[beautress]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

Attitude. Any other droll questions?

 

[miketx]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

Plus they hire queers and girlie men to "teach" our kids.

 

[BULLDOG]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

Attitude. Any other droll questions?

So attitude is the main thing to learn about physics? I gotta disagree with you on that one.

 

[beautress]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”

They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

Attitude. Any other droll questions?

So attitude is the main thing to learn about physics? I gotta disagree with you on that one.

Not if you're on the battlefield of life and that guy with attitude threw himself in front of that bullet that would have taken you out, sir. Or the office dummy who contacted his investor uncle and got funding for your breakthrough in physics.

Attitude of the founders is why we have the best country on this planet, even with all its flaws. And attitude can tell you where your ace in the hole is. It's right there at the edge of your rolled up sleeve, taking on a project nobody else would ever consider doing because they don't have the right attitude toward doing one thing well.

 

[BULLDOG]

Tennessee lawmaker Kerry Roberts calls for removal of higher education | TribLIVE.com
NASHVILLE — A Republican Tennessee lawmaker says he supports getting rid of higher education because he argues it would cut off the “liberal breeding ground.”


They should remove it , this has been nothing but a Gov. scam from day one.

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

Attitude. Any other droll questions?

So attitude is the main thing to learn about physics? I gotta disagree with you on that one.

Not if you're on the battlefield of life and that guy with attitude threw himself in front of that bullet that would have taken you out, sir. Or the office dummy who contacted his investor uncle and got funding for your breakthrough in physics.

Attitude of the founders is why we have the best country on this planet, even with all its flaws. And attitude can tell you where your ace in the hole is. It's right there at the edge of your rolled up sleeve, taking on a project nobody else would ever consider doing because they don't have the right attitude toward doing one thing well.

I've taken some pretty tough physics courses, but none of them had bullets flying around the classroom. I could figure it's trajectory if I ever ended up in that situation though. Why would you make yourself look so dumb just to back up that stupid remark you made? .

 

[Correll]

He was driven underground when it was revealed that, being homosexual, he had a checkered sexual past.


Somehow, that was a shock to some people.

Your justification of the discrimination in education, shows that you are a petty tyrant.

He was driven underground because he is a hateful fascist and a hypocrite . And when the fuck did I advocate for discrimination in education. ? It's apparent that you are unable to grasp what I wrote.

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

Oh don't think the Left doesn't support Speech Codes and silencing dissent. They favor both in a very big way. They are not Constitutionalists, they are Totalitarians and the Constitution prevents them from getting the ability to micromanage others, which is why they hate the constitution.

THERE IS NO FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO MOCK — OH, WAIT: Cal Poly investigates Instagram photo ‘mocking’ illegal immigrants. Not only is the university powerless to stop students from mocking illegal immigrants, even investigating students who do so is a First Amendment violation.

The guy states that he is opposed to silencing conservatives, then immediately gloats that milo was silenced for his political views and then he mocks me, when I point out the contradiction.


They are stupid and insane to the point that it is impossible to have a conversation with them. You spend most of your time, trying to get them in the same zip code as reality.


Trying and generally failing.

 

[Correll]

He was driven underground when it was revealed that, being homosexual, he had a checkered sexual past.


Somehow, that was a shock to some people.

Your justification of the discrimination in education, shows that you are a petty tyrant.

He was driven underground because he is a hateful fascist and a hypocrite . And when the fuck did I advocate for discrimination in education. ? It's apparent that you are unable to grasp what I wrote.

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

 

[Zorro!]

He was driven underground because he is a hateful fascist and a hypocrite . And when the fuck did I advocate for discrimination in education. ? It's apparent that you are unable to grasp what I wrote.

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I'm a conservative. I don't want anyone silenced. But as for "digging up old sexual stuff on Milo" I've heard him be pretty forthright about some really disgusting stuff.

 

[Correll]

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I'm a conservative. I don't want anyone silenced. But as for "digging up old sexual stuff on Milo" I've heard him be pretty forthright about some really disgusting stuff.

Yep. But A. we knew he was gay, and B. it was just an excuse.


When you let them hold a conservative speaker to a standard they do not hold themselves to, you are playing their rigged game.


That is a sure fire way to lose.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

He was driven underground because he is a hateful fascist and a hypocrite . And when the fuck did I advocate for discrimination in education. ? It's apparent that you are unable to grasp what I wrote.

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I said that I do not condone it, or think that it is a useful strategy. I will leave the outrage to you.

 

[beautress]

Education should be manned by men who have been on the front lines of wars and knows how real life is.

The Universities have turned themselves into funding anomalies for perpetrating a way of life that is hostile to courtesy, honest debate, and anything that is not a push to Socialistic society. Socialism is merely a soft word for blatant Communism, complete with histories of how the people are control-freaked into oblivion if they don't show due obiescence to the oligarchs of the socialistic society, which like the committee that is always impeaching the President for getting taxpayers to fund their campaign mediaspeak instead of using their own funds to get attention. They use the tax money you and I pay to get their political points across. That way, with what's left over from their incessant fund-raising from promises that cost all Americans the big bucks in tax fees, they walk away very rich individuals. How else could an almost bankrupt bartender dress herself in designer clothes now, get facials and nail jobs at the spa, expensive makeup artists, expensive condominiums, lobster thrice a day, etc.

What special skill does being on the front line of a war impart that improves the ability to teach physics or math , or any other subject?

Attitude. Any other droll questions?

So attitude is the main thing to learn about physics? I gotta disagree with you on that one.

Not if you're on the battlefield of life and that guy with attitude threw himself in front of that bullet that would have taken you out, sir. Or the office dummy who contacted his investor uncle and got funding for your breakthrough in physics.

Attitude of the founders is why we have the best country on this planet, even with all its flaws. And attitude can tell you where your ace in the hole is. It's right there at the edge of your rolled up sleeve, taking on a project nobody else would ever consider doing because they don't have the right attitude toward doing one thing well.

I've taken some pretty tough physics courses, but none of them had bullets flying around the classroom. I could figure it's trajectory if I ever ended up in that situation though. Why would you make yourself look so dumb just to back up that stupid remark you made? .

Bulldog the charmer sez: "I've taken some pretty tough physics courses, but none of them had bullets flying around the classroom. I could figure it's trajectory if I ever ended up in that situation though. Why would you make yourself look so dumb just to back up that stupid remark you made?"
​

Because I thought you were smarter and a potential bit better than a box of rocks. My bad.

 

[Correll]

Oh, so you admit that all the talk about his sexual past was just an excuse? THanks.


After all, we all know that homosexuals by their nature, are gong to have sordid sexual pasts, so when the lib activists managed to dig up something sexual on him, and ginned up a media buzz about it,


we both knew that was just an excuse.


So, to recap, as we both agree, Milo was a massively popular speaker, and then was silenced for his political views.


That is "barring far right speakers". Something you just said you dont' support.


SO that was a lie.


You said you don't support it, because you WANT their views seen and thus discredited.


But we have established that you are lying. So the opposite of that would be that you want them silenced, because you fear that if people actually get to hear them,


that they will find their views and ideas far more reasonable than yours.



And when you support the idea that an industry that obviously is hostile to people of a certain group, and just happens to not hire people of that group, and you celebrate that that other group is not included?


YOu are supporting discrimination.



D'uh.

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I said that I do not condone it, or think that it is a useful strategy. I will leave the outrage to you.

So, to clarify, you don't condone it, but you also, refuse to condemn it, and you will parrot the bullshit excuses and rationalizations that the lefty fascist thugs use to justify and rationalize their violence and oppression.



Kind of having it both ways there, aren't ya.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I said that I do not condone it, or think that it is a useful strategy. I will leave the outrage to you.

So, to clarify, you don't condone it, but you also, refuse to condemn it, and you will parrot the bullshit excuses and rationalizations that the lefty fascist thugs use to justify and rationalize their violence and oppression.



Kind of having it both ways there, aren't ya.

The problem here is your unsophisticated, ridged, concreate, all or nothing thought process that does not allow you to deal with nuances. Let me try this analogy-on the outside possibility that you can understand analogies: I am against the death penalty, but I am not about to organize a protest on behalf of someone about to be executed who is clearly guilty of a heinous crime.

 

[Correll]

1. You admitted that he was silenced for his politics.

2. Your support of that, contradicts your claim that you do not support silencing those on the right.

3. Then I looked at your other claims, based on your previous lies, and evaluated them accordingly.



That is three points, hardly a flood. And really, 1, and 2, are really one point, your admission contradicting your stated position on silencing.

And I challenge you to point out which of them are lies, or have flaws.

First of all your use of the word "admit" here is idiotic. You admit something when there is something to hide or deny. I never denied that it was for political reasons

Secondly, I don't believe that any living being is so stupid as to believe that acknowledging that something happened is the same as condoning it, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt there

I will just chalk it up to one more of your dishonest , juvenile games. As far as "my lies" go, you're either just making that shit up or imagining it based on your twisted and tenuous relationship with truth and reality.

So, to clarify, you condemn those that rioted and shut down milo events, the administrators.that shut them down, and the media vultures that dug up old sexual dirt and ginned up a scandal to drive him "underground"?

Because you OPPOSE silencing conservatives?

I said that I do not condone it, or think that it is a useful strategy. I will leave the outrage to you.

So, to clarify, you don't condone it, but you also, refuse to condemn it, and you will parrot the bullshit excuses and rationalizations that the lefty fascist thugs use to justify and rationalize their violence and oppression.



Kind of having it both ways there, aren't ya.

The problem here is your unsophisticated, ridged, concreate, all or nothing thought process that does not allow you to deal with nuances. Let me try this analogy-on the outside possibility that you can understand analogies: I am against the death penalty, but I am not about to organize a protest on behalf of someone about to be executed who is clearly guilty of a heinous crime.

The problem is that an increasingly large and powerful segment of our population believes in using violence and any power or control they have, to "silence" their political opposition.


YOu claim to not support them, but you parrot the bullshit lies they use to justify their violence and abuse of power.


That you would rather focus on me, is you deflecting, which is generally a form of defense. Of people you claim to not support.


THat, btw, is a fairly sophisticated and nuanced view of the situation. Which demolishes your latest justification for your actions.