OK let's say the stimulous did its job. We don't need MORE "stimulous" now do we.
What does this absurdity, "we know what congress will continue to do, because congress has always been the same" mean?
You do realise congress has changed quite a bit over the past 200 years, right?
And, after all, Obama promised "change......."
Obama can promise all he like, doesn't mean it will come true.
Like I said, our politicians have been the same for a long time in terms of character. Hell, even some of our founders have had their moments.
Look up John Adams and the Alien & Sedition Act he passed.
Let's just try to remain on topic.
You (and/or the article) claims that Republicans are practicing some sort of obstructionist parlimentary game, for no reason other than being "obstructionist."
I say they're trying to control spending.
You say, no, they alone want to only control CERTAIN spending. There is OTHER spending that they alone don't mind, and that Democrats shun?
Where you have evidence of this since January 2009?