GOP Kills Science Jobs Bill By Forcing Dems To Vote For Porn

[The T]

Horseshit and deflection dweeb.

So tell me Thomas, as a "originalist", what would you do if elected. Humor me.

You know where *MY* site is if you want to know *MY* stand dweeb.

 

[Modbert]

You know where *MY* site is if you want to know *MY* stand dweeb.

I want you to be able to tell me on the fly, not post some regurgitated bullshit. And do name some specifics, just don't give the usual "Oh, I'm for lower taxes! Hooray!"

 

[RetiredGySgt]

It figures all I get is deflection on this one though. Especially when it comes to the source. People need to learn the difference between a opinion piece and a piece that reports facts.

By the way, I find the irony delicious in those that are complaining about the source are never around when someone here posts something from freerepublic or WND. Interesting.

You are the one that sets the stage by routinely claiming someone else's source is no good even when it is the truth.

 

[The T]

It figures all I get is deflection on this one though. Especially when it comes to the source. People need to learn the difference between a opinion piece and a piece that reports facts.

By the way, I find the irony delicious in those that are complaining about the source are never around when someone here posts something from freerepublic or WND. Interesting.

You are the one that sets the stage by routinely claiming someone else's source is no good even when it is the truth.

And why this thread foisted by him is partisan horseshit.

 

[saveliberty]

You have rdean to thank for that.

Or people could just take responsibility and not be hypocrites. You won't find me posting DailyKos, or a left wing opinion piece on here. The one time I did? It was about how Liberals should be more Pro-Gun because of the 2nd Amendment, which I agreed with.

So I find people taking issue with the source while not decrying the others to be hilarious.

I thought I was very direct and factual in post #25.

 

[Modbert]

You are the one that sets the stage by routinely claiming someone else's source is no good even when it is the truth.

Sorry to burst your bubble, Obama was born here in the U.S.

Otherwise, not sure what threads you're talking about.

 

[Modbert]

I thought I was very direct and factual in post #25.

My problem (and as it should be your problem as well) with this move is making amendments to bills that have nothing to do with the bills themselves.

 

[Samson]

At this point, is there really any excuse for the obstructionism, other than to just say the Dems didn't get anything done?

The bill -- a re-authorization of the 2007 COMPETES Act -- has been supported by interests usually seen as aligned with Republicans, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Regardless of the source's bias (or not, and I'll assume not), I'm not certain this sort of parlimentary silliness is monopolised by Republicans.

However, as an "excuse for the obstructionism," how about: We have no money to spend, much less INCREASE spending.

GOP yesterday killed a House bill that would increase funding for scientific research and math and science education

I'm sorry, folks, but the whinging about not having money to pay for "increased funding" has just BEGUN.

 

[Modbert]

I'm sorry, folks, but the whinging about not having money to pay for "increased funding" has just BUGUN.

Not really. It will just be bills that are rejected that one side doesn't agree with. Congress will continue to buy stuff for the Military that the Pentagon neither wants or needs.

 

[boedicca]

What Samson said.

Given the unfolding horror of excessive spending in ObamaCare, it makes sense to block every single spending increase until we have a real plan to eliminate the deficit, reinvigorate economic growth, and create Private Sector Jobs that do not require federal subsidization.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I thought I was very direct and factual in post #25.

My problem (and as it should be your problem as well) with this move is making amendments to bills that have nothing to do with the bills themselves.

And yet we have NEVER seen you complain when the Democrats do JUST that. Only when a Republican manages it. I wonder why that is?

 

[Modbert]

And yet we have NEVER seen you complain when the Democrats do JUST that. Only when a Republican manages it. I wonder why that is?

Except I have. When Pelosi was making stupid comments and adding things into the HC Bill, I said she was a and I quote "fucking idiot". I stand by those comments.

And to turn the tables over, I never see you do it when a Republican does it. Here's an opportunity RGS.

 

[Si modo]

LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.

 

[Samson]

I'm sorry, folks, but the whinging about not having money to pay for "increased funding" has just BUGUN.

Not really. It will just be bills that are rejected that one side doesn't agree with. Congress will continue to buy stuff for the Military that the Pentagon neither wants or needs.

Conjecture, based on??

Niether you or I know what "Congress will continue" to do.

However, the need to cut government spending, NOW, is indisputable.

The "stimulous packages" are failing, or have not had the desired effect. Its not too late, yet, to change course.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

And yet we have NEVER seen you complain when the Democrats do JUST that. Only when a Republican manages it. I wonder why that is?

Except I have. When Pelosi was making stupid comments and adding things into the HC Bill, I said she was a and I quote "fucking idiot". I stand by those comments.

And to turn the tables over, I never see you do it when a Republican does it. Here's an opportunity RGS.

I happen to think this one was the right one to stop, BUT thanks for playing. We have no money, there should be no increases for anything until we have a balanced budget. Obama and the dems seem to think we can just print all the new money we want.

I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires that every proposed bill in either house must list the power granted to create said bill from the Constitution. And the same for any amendment to any bill.

I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires a balanced budget with only the Military needs of the Nation overriding that.

 

[Modbert]

LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.

Modo, your pitiful attempts to mark me as a troll fail when I'm trying to have a serious discussion. I see you want no part of that though.

 

[Modbert]

Conjecture, based on??

Niether you or I know what "Congress will continue" to do.

However, the need to cut government spending, NOW, is indisputable.

The "stimulous packages" are failing, or have not had the desired effect. Its not too late, yet, to change course.

We know what congress will continue to do because congress has always been the same. It has never changed. The players might, but the rampant corruption and stupidity never does.

As for the Stimulus, it did it's intended job.

 

[Modbert]

I happen to think this one was the right one to stop, BUT thanks for playing. We have no money, there should be no increases for anything until we have a balanced budget. Obama and the dems seem to think we can just print all the new money we want.

I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires that every proposed bill in either house must list the power granted to create said bill from the Constitution. And the same for any amendment to any bill.

I support an Amendment to the US Constitution that requires a balanced budget with only the Military needs of the Nation overriding that.

So wait, no increases in anything for a good X amount of years? Do you listen to yourself?

And of course, you support a Amendment that requires a balanced budget, while realizing with your little loophole that the defense budget will always make it not balanced. Nice try.

Also, your first amendment would just be ripe for abuse and corruption.

 

[Si modo]

LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.

Modo, your pitiful attempts to mark me as a troll fail when I'm trying to have a serious discussion. I see you want no part of that though.

My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.

Your OP set the tone. Trolling. Nothing more.

At this point, I doubt you even have the capacity to see that. Of course, you are NEVER wrong, ESPECIALLY when women call you out.

 

[Modbert]

My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.

Your OP set the tone. Trolling. Nothing more.

At this point, I doubt you even have the capacity to see that. Of course, you are NEVER wrong, ESPECIALLY when women call you out.

OP is trolling? Nope.

And you know, once again you accuse me of being a sexist with absolutely no proof. I wonder how is it I'm friends with so many women on here if I'm a sexist? Oh wait, I'm not.

PI sure is though, as is Rabbi. Won't you see going after them though, they're Republicans. They're on your side. So keep on trolling yourself there Modo.