GOP Intel Chief Busts Trump Lie: My Committee Never Said ‘No Collusion’

[jillian]

What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?

that's only what nunes' report said. dum dum.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No he F-ing did NOT - We don't know what Mueller has at this point

Please stop

The Carlos Slim Times reported today that Mueller hit a dead end on Trumps conspiracy to collude and is now looking at the Comey and Flynn firings

Speculation in it's purest form. They are exploring about a couple DOZEN elements .. and none of us know what those are.

Please stop

Mueller's got nothing or Andrew Weissmann would have leaked it.

NOTHING

No THING

Not a fucking single thing linking Trump to Russia in any criminal manner

NOTHING

NADA

ZIP

ZIPPO

גאָרנישט

ничего

아무것도!

no matter what language you put it in, you're both liars and you embarrass yourselves constantly.

*shrug*

Please post the "Evidence" linking Trump to any criminal act at all never mind involving imaginary Russia Conspiracy to collude to schlong Hillary and the Dems on the night of November 8th 2016

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's check:

2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"

52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™

The only thing more hilarious than a Rasmussen poll is an online Drudge Poll.

Sorry Chic - But ya lost me there .. I'll get to the rest when hell freezes over

All of your posts evince an attempt to be clever.

None of them succeed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

No he F-ing did NOT - We don't know what Mueller has at this point

Please stop

The Carlos Slim Times reported today that Mueller hit a dead end on Trumps conspiracy to collude and is now looking at the Comey and Flynn firings

Speculation in it's purest form. They are exploring about a couple DOZEN elements .. and none of us know what those are.

Please stop

Mueller's got nothing or Andrew Weissmann would have leaked it.

NOTHING

No THING

Not a fucking single thing linking Trump to Russia in any criminal manner

NOTHING

NADA

ZIP

ZIPPO

גאָרנישט

ничего

아무것도!

no matter what language you put it in, you're both liars and you embarrass yourselves constantly.

*shrug*

You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.

 

[DrLove]

You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.

Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.

 

[whitehall]

What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?

 

[debbiedowner]

What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?

What part of we didn't interview a long list of potential witnesses are you having trouble with? Of course they are not going to find anything if they sit rotating on their thumbs.

 

[debbiedowner]

What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?

No evidence and no collusion are different.

 

[MaryAnne11]

Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.

Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.

Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.


“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”

And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”

Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.

He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.

Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”

Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.

Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.


So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men.

Conway also said Democrats would be publishing their conclusion and if anything came up they would reopen.

Then mentioned being forgiven for missing Church! How he could say yay with a straight face is beyond me.

 

[jc456]

What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?

Mike Conaway seems to be troubled by this "evidence" too due to lack of a in depth investigation.....

i.e.

News broke Saturday showing Cambridge Analytica harvested the private information of about 50 million Facebook users against the social media’s site’s terms of service. Information totally avoided of investigation.

Conaway on Sunday acknowledged the committee did not interview former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos and other key figures, because he didn’t want to overlap with special counsel Robert Mueller's criminal investigation.

“We’re trying to stay away from the Mueller investigation and not confuse that or hurt it one way or the other,” he said.

soo why would they investigate everyone mueller did? if they did that, then why have mueller? They ran their investigation and found 'no' evidence of collusion. correct? Trump didn't lie.

 

[eddiew37]

if trump colluded with the Russians, mueller would have had him out of office by now..

all in due time Need a few more republicans to grow some brains

 

[PoliticalChic]

You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.

Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.

I have no interest in your infirmities.

If you're angling for a prescription for your ADD, please make that application to your medical adviser.

If, as I believe, you're attempting to hide from the facts that I post......facts......in that case, appeal to your clergyman of choice who will, hopefully, fill in your moral lacunae.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?

No evidence and no collusion are different.

You should recognize that there is exactly the same evidence for your collusion with the Russians.

Don't try to deny that you wanted to be President.

 

[PoliticalChic]

if trump colluded with the Russians, mueller would have had him out of office by now..

all in due time Need a few more republicans to grow some brains

And, on the subject of brains....

a. "Trump's opioid plan to take three-pronged approach, including death penalty for high-volume drug dealers
(CNN)President Donald Trump will roll outb. new plans to tackle the country's opioid epidemic on Monday in New Hampshire, the White House said Sunday. The plan will include stiffer penalties for high-intensity drug traffickers, including the death penalty for some dealers,..."
Trump's new opioid plan to take three-pronged approach - CNNPolitics




Compare that with this:


b. "The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook
An ambitious U.S. task force targeting Hezbollah's billion-dollar criminal enterprise ran headlong into the White House's desire for a nuclear deal with Iran.

[Obama] derailed an ambitious law enforcement campaign targeting drug trafficking by the Iranian-backed terrorist group Hezbollah, even as it was funneling cocaine into the United States, according to a POLITICO investigation.
...$1 billion a year from [cocaine] drug and weapons trafficking,...
... Barack Obama’s hidden Iran deal concessions..."
The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook



Now, ol' pal.....which is the one you support?????



(pssst.....careful, eddie.....it's a one question IQ test)

 

[DrLove]

You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.

Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.

I have no interest in your infirmities.

If you're angling for a prescription for your ADD, please make that application to your medical adviser.

If, as I believe, you're attempting to hide from the facts that I post......facts......in that case, appeal to your clergyman of choice who will, hopefully, fill in your moral lacunae.

Do you consider yourself to be some sort of pseudo-intellectual Don Rickles?

It isn't working, and you wouldn't know a "fact" if it smacked ya upside.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.

Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.

Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.


“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”

And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”

Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.

He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.

Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”

Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.

Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.


So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men.

nope. the committee never did say no collusion. and anyone who takes anything Devon (head up trump's butt) Nunes says at face value is delusional.

Can you shows us where this collusion is a crime?

 

[DrLove]

What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?

No evidence and no collusion are different.

I gave up Deb - they're never going to understand even the most basic concepts.

 

[DrLove]

Can you shows us where this collusion is a crime?

What is this - the eleventyeth berzillion time we've acknowledged that fact?

Better question: Since "collusion" ISN'T a crime, then why do Donnie Dumpster and his adoring flock keep saying "NO COLLUSION!!

He sure has dumbed you people down!

 

[PoliticalChic]

You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.

Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.

I have no interest in your infirmities.

If you're angling for a prescription for your ADD, please make that application to your medical adviser.

If, as I believe, you're attempting to hide from the facts that I post......facts......in that case, appeal to your clergyman of choice who will, hopefully, fill in your moral lacunae.

Do you consider yourself to be some sort of pseudo-intellectual Don Rickles?

It isn't working, and you wouldn't know a "fact" if it smacked ya upside.

You prove that all of my posts are facts by being unable to dispute any of same.

And....nothing 'pseudo' about moi.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can you shows us where this collusion is a crime?

What is this - the eleventyeth berzillion time we've acknowledged that fact?

Better question: Since "collusion" ISN'T a crime, then why do Donnie Dumpster and his adoring flock keep saying "NO COLLUSION!!

He sure has dumbed you people down!

Because he never even "Colluded" with the Russians