GOP Intel Chief Busts Trump Lie: My Committee Never Said ‘No Collusion’

TheMoreYouKnow

Silver Member
Dec 14, 2017
1,246
182
110
Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.

Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.

Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.


“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”


And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”

Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.

He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.

Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”

Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.

Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.


So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men. :113:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?

Mike Conaway seems to be troubled by this "evidence" too due to lack of a in depth investigation.....:113:

i.e.

News broke Saturday showing Cambridge Analytica harvested the private information of about 50 million Facebook users against the social media’s site’s terms of service. Information totally avoided of investigation.

Conaway on Sunday acknowledged the committee did not interview former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos and other key figures, because he didn’t want to overlap with special counsel Robert Mueller's criminal investigation.

“We’re trying to stay away from the Mueller investigation and not confuse that or hurt it one way or the other,” he said.
 
Last edited:
The Republican House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation was a sham from day one. Nunes and Ryan should be prosecuted.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
if Filthy Don had no problem with any Russian collusion investigation he wouldn't lawyer up.

At this point, Filthy Don's lawyers are also 'lawyering' up! :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Last edited:
I am just taking a wild guess here but...uhhhh.... anyone who thinks Russia "colluded" with The Donald, assuming "colluding" is actually illegal, is in-fucking-sane! :p

Getting tired of filthy, scum, idiots parroting fake news MSNBC.
 
Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.

Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.

Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.


“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”


And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.

“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”

Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.

He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.

Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”

Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.

Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.


So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men. :113:



There is as much evidence of the charges against the President as there is against you.


Got a lawyer?
 
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
How can you have evidence of it if you didn't even have the people involved interviewed....

the whole Russia investigation and collusion began with Papadopolous....

Did the Republican lead congressional Intelligence committee even call him to testify before them?

NO

Did they force the Trump minions testifying about the Trump tower meeting to ACTUALLY answer their questions

NO they did not.....

so it is no surprise that they

FOUND NO EVIDENCE....blah blah blah

it's all another sham....that Trumpsters fell for, overwhelmingly.....based on all the threads claiming "No Collusion"....
 
At what point does....
"Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me"

Come in to play?
 
if Filthy Don had no problem with any Russian collusion investigation he wouldn't lawyer up.

At this point, Filthy Don's lawyers are also 'lawyering' up


.....and you "silly liberals" doubt that our beloved Trump is NOT creating jobs????
Just look at ALL the lawyers that are being hired by almost anyone who even remotely deals with the orange buffoon???.......................lol
 
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?

They also found no evidence that the sky is blue. Just because they didn't find proof that trump conspired with the Russians doesn't mean that proof doesn't exist.
 
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
How can you have evidence of it if you didn't even have the people involved interviewed....

the whole Russia investigation and collusion began with Papadopolous....

Did the Republican lead congressional Intelligence committee even call him to testify before them?

NO

Did they force the Trump minions testifying about the Trump tower meeting to ACTUALLY answer their questions

NO they did not.....

so it is no surprise that they

FOUND NO EVIDENCE....blah blah blah

it's all another sham....that Trumpsters fell for, overwhelmingly.....based on all the threads claiming "No Collusion"....
All right MORON, Post up the evidence...
 
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
How can you have evidence of it if you didn't even have the people involved interviewed....

the whole Russia investigation and collusion began with Papadopolous....

Did the Republican lead congressional Intelligence committee even call him to testify before them?

NO

Did they force the Trump minions testifying about the Trump tower meeting to ACTUALLY answer their questions

NO they did not.....

so it is no surprise that they

FOUND NO EVIDENCE....blah blah blah

it's all another sham....that Trumpsters fell for, overwhelmingly.....based on all the threads claiming "No Collusion"....


Looks like the #2 Democrat on the Intel committee 'fell for it' too....




JIM HIMES FULL ONE-ON-ONE INTERVIEW ON FOX NEWS SUNDAY WITH CHRIS WALLACE(2/25/2018)


@ 07:50


Wallace asks Himes “Is there hard evidence that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians….do you have any evidence or not?”

Himes: “…two of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy advisers have now either pled guilty or been indicted and the national security adviser…has pled guilty….

Wallace: “But there is no evidence in any of that that there was collusion.

Himes: Well, it depends on how you define collusion…..[hommina hommina….]

You tell me, Chris, if that crosses your threshold for collusion.

Wallace: As long as you ask…no it doesn’t.”




The only ......ONLY.....individuals for whom there is actual documtneted evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are DEMOCRATS.




Ask me to name them.




And don't forget to use 'duhhhhh' in your next post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top