What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
that's only what nunes' report said. dum dum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
No he F-ing did NOT - We don't know what Mueller has at this point
Please stop
The Carlos Slim Times reported today that Mueller hit a dead end on Trumps conspiracy to collude and is now looking at the Comey and Flynn firings
Speculation in it's purest form. They are exploring about a couple DOZEN elements .. and none of us know what those are.
Please stop
Mueller's got nothing or Andrew Weissmann would have leaked it.
NOTHING
No THING
Not a fucking single thing linking Trump to Russia in any criminal manner
NOTHING
NADA
ZIP
ZIPPO
גאָרנישט
ничего
아무것도!
no matter what language you put it in, you're both liars and you embarrass yourselves constantly.
*shrug*
Let's check:
2. "52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™
The only thing more hilarious than a Rasmussen poll is an online Drudge Poll.
Sorry Chic - But ya lost me there .. I'll get to the rest when hell freezes over
No he F-ing did NOT - We don't know what Mueller has at this point
Please stop
The Carlos Slim Times reported today that Mueller hit a dead end on Trumps conspiracy to collude and is now looking at the Comey and Flynn firings
Speculation in it's purest form. They are exploring about a couple DOZEN elements .. and none of us know what those are.
Please stop
Mueller's got nothing or Andrew Weissmann would have leaked it.
NOTHING
No THING
Not a fucking single thing linking Trump to Russia in any criminal manner
NOTHING
NADA
ZIP
ZIPPO
גאָרנישט
ничего
아무것도!
no matter what language you put it in, you're both liars and you embarrass yourselves constantly.
*shrug*
You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.
What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?
Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.
Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.
Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.
“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”
And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.
“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”
Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.
He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.
Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”
Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.
Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.
So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men.
soo why would they investigate everyone mueller did? if they did that, then why have mueller? They ran their investigation and found 'no' evidence of collusion. correct? Trump didn't lie.What part of "no evidence of" are you having trouble with?
Mike Conaway seems to be troubled by this "evidence" too due to lack of a in depth investigation.....
i.e.
News broke Saturday showing Cambridge Analytica harvested the private information of about 50 million Facebook users against the social media’s site’s terms of service. Information totally avoided of investigation.
Conaway on Sunday acknowledged the committee did not interview former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos and other key figures, because he didn’t want to overlap with special counsel Robert Mueller's criminal investigation.
“We’re trying to stay away from the Mueller investigation and not confuse that or hurt it one way or the other,” he said.
all in due time Need a few more republicans to grow some brainsif trump colluded with the Russians, mueller would have had him out of office by now..
You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.
Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.
What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?
No evidence and no collusion are different.
all in due time Need a few more republicans to grow some brainsif trump colluded with the Russians, mueller would have had him out of office by now..
You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.
Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.
I have no interest in your infirmities.
If you're angling for a prescription for your ADD, please make that application to your medical adviser.
If, as I believe, you're attempting to hide from the facts that I post......facts......in that case, appeal to your clergyman of choice who will, hopefully, fill in your moral lacunae.
Republican Rep. Mike Conaway quickly and clearly shot down Trump's favorite self-serving talking point.
Trump never tires of telling the “no collusion” lie. But even Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican head of the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation, won’t go along with him.
Trump made the bogus claim again Sunday morning. And Conaway quickly issued a clear correction during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“Do you now regret trying to draw a conclusion about collusion?” host Chuck Todd asked.
“Well, we haven’t drawn that,” Conaway replied. “What we said … is that we found no evidence of it.”
And he pointedly noted that it’s “a different statement” than what Trump repeatedly insists.
“We found no evidence of collusion,” he repeated, as opposed to a clear ruling of “no collusion.”
Conaway, who took charge of the probe following the ostensible recusal of chairman Devin Nunes, is far from a Trump foe.
He and the other Republicans on the committee released a sham report that contradicted the U.S. intelligence community. And they ended the probe without questioning a long list of important witnesses.
Yet even Conaway is refusing to go along with Trump’s self-serving lie that the committee has shown there was “no collusion.”
Furthermore, this rebuke comes on the same day that two other notable Republican voices have taken a stand against Trump’s behavior. Conaway’s fellow intel committee member Trey Gowdy said that Trump’s lawyer is making him look guilty. And Sen. Lindsey Graham threatened toremove Trump if he fired Mueller.
Republicans have been almost unanimous in their complicity with Trump to date. But as Trump plays with fire by attacking Robert Mueller, their wall of silence is finally beginning to crack.
So there's that lie to add to Filthy Don's attacks on the G-Men.
nope. the committee never did say no collusion. and anyone who takes anything Devon (head up trump's butt) Nunes says at face value is delusional.
What about the Chicago Trib, the Washington Times, the Washington Post and the Blaze blog and probably another dozen news sources that say the Congressional Intell committee found no collusion? Was Conway in a freaking coma?
No evidence and no collusion are different.
Can you shows us where this collusion is a crime?
You remain a pacifist, out of necessity, in a battle of wits.
Beats wasting time with an unarmed Trumptard who rarely posts anything less than 5,000 words.
I have no interest in your infirmities.
If you're angling for a prescription for your ADD, please make that application to your medical adviser.
If, as I believe, you're attempting to hide from the facts that I post......facts......in that case, appeal to your clergyman of choice who will, hopefully, fill in your moral lacunae.
Do you consider yourself to be some sort of pseudo-intellectual Don Rickles?
It isn't working, and you wouldn't know a "fact" if it smacked ya upside.
Can you shows us where this collusion is a crime?
What is this - the eleventyeth berzillion time we've acknowledged that fact?
Better question: Since "collusion" ISN'T a crime, then why do Donnie Dumpster and his adoring flock keep saying "NO COLLUSION!!
He sure has dumbed you people down!