- Sep 22, 2013
- 4,956
- 250
- 85
This is a TrumpUSA op-ed inspired by The Insider.
====
An American Internet-blogger (John) started thinking about creating a room where he could simply post on the Internet all day. He surrounded himself with joysticks, video-games, monitors, signal interception boxes and dials, and anti-virus software and manuals. He also kept logs of Internet posts of bloggers with historical/cultural relevance to his own posts. He was the opposite of the Unabomber.
John believed that this new world under 'TrumpUSA' was gauged by daydreams about mobility and transportation. People fantasized about travelling to the moon to build casinos and seeing incredible leprechauns in the forest reminding them of the metaphysical intelligence of capitalism and maybe even commerce (Wall Street). It was a 'fairy-tale' world for consumers, and John wanted to compare old world folklore regarding temperance with new TrumpUSA world values about consumerism vigor. John even compared sacred angels to modern stockbrokers.
Should John be considered a fanatic, or is his brand of consumerism monitoring a sign of new age pedestrianism-gauged politics? Does commerce traffic generate political podiums (e.g., European Union)? John believed it could, and he collected dolls of American horror-film avatars (e.g., Freddy Krueger) to remind him of the modern sociocultural investment in calculation-based fears (e.g., A Nightmare on Elm Street) and why real-estate was 'linked' to settlement and immigration paranoia. John never bad-mouthed TrumpUSA, though his Internet posts were very offbeat and often referenced ideas about consumerism aesthetics.
Was John part of a new world order catering to consumerism circus mentality, or was he truly a 'modernism detective' assessing the peaks and valleys of modern world tolerability? Since John was not a terrorist, he was construed to be a politics-critic, but would free-speech space in America and the Internet provide John with the liberty to be a intellectual-freedom messenger? Why was human literature filled with stories about people struggling to have their minority voices heard?
TRUMP: The age of media means censorship concerns.
CARTER: The age of consumerism and cheeseburgers beckons the FDA.
TRUMP: Kids like video-games.
CARTER: There are many fanatical Internet-bloggers.
TRUMP: True, and there are many fanatical ISIS terrorists!
CARTER: Should we cater to radical pro-democracy views?
TRUMP: Radical democracy seems less dangerous than radical terrorism...
CARTER: True (hehe), but we have to be objective!
TRUMP: I suppose commerce creates pornography-screening worries.
CARTER: Anti-American terrorists view consumerism as pornography.
TRUMP: That's why the World Trade Center was destroyed.
CARTER: We need more idealistic rhetoric regarding the World Bank.
====
====
An American Internet-blogger (John) started thinking about creating a room where he could simply post on the Internet all day. He surrounded himself with joysticks, video-games, monitors, signal interception boxes and dials, and anti-virus software and manuals. He also kept logs of Internet posts of bloggers with historical/cultural relevance to his own posts. He was the opposite of the Unabomber.
John believed that this new world under 'TrumpUSA' was gauged by daydreams about mobility and transportation. People fantasized about travelling to the moon to build casinos and seeing incredible leprechauns in the forest reminding them of the metaphysical intelligence of capitalism and maybe even commerce (Wall Street). It was a 'fairy-tale' world for consumers, and John wanted to compare old world folklore regarding temperance with new TrumpUSA world values about consumerism vigor. John even compared sacred angels to modern stockbrokers.
Should John be considered a fanatic, or is his brand of consumerism monitoring a sign of new age pedestrianism-gauged politics? Does commerce traffic generate political podiums (e.g., European Union)? John believed it could, and he collected dolls of American horror-film avatars (e.g., Freddy Krueger) to remind him of the modern sociocultural investment in calculation-based fears (e.g., A Nightmare on Elm Street) and why real-estate was 'linked' to settlement and immigration paranoia. John never bad-mouthed TrumpUSA, though his Internet posts were very offbeat and often referenced ideas about consumerism aesthetics.
Was John part of a new world order catering to consumerism circus mentality, or was he truly a 'modernism detective' assessing the peaks and valleys of modern world tolerability? Since John was not a terrorist, he was construed to be a politics-critic, but would free-speech space in America and the Internet provide John with the liberty to be a intellectual-freedom messenger? Why was human literature filled with stories about people struggling to have their minority voices heard?
TRUMP: The age of media means censorship concerns.
CARTER: The age of consumerism and cheeseburgers beckons the FDA.
TRUMP: Kids like video-games.
CARTER: There are many fanatical Internet-bloggers.
TRUMP: True, and there are many fanatical ISIS terrorists!
CARTER: Should we cater to radical pro-democracy views?
TRUMP: Radical democracy seems less dangerous than radical terrorism...
CARTER: True (hehe), but we have to be objective!
TRUMP: I suppose commerce creates pornography-screening worries.
CARTER: Anti-American terrorists view consumerism as pornography.
TRUMP: That's why the World Trade Center was destroyed.
CARTER: We need more idealistic rhetoric regarding the World Bank.
====
