GLobal warming debunked: NASA report verifies CO2 actually cools atmosphere

[Pop23]

the human race is only 10,000's years old (and I just threw that number out there) the last ice age happened like 12,000 years ago.....We are not special folks. The dinosaurs were around for millions of years. Earth changes and she dont give a rats ass about us. maybe we were just an experment? who knows....

With that attitude, Al Gore will be broke in a year. I don't want Al sniveling round my door looking for spare change.

Go back to your cave and think that one over again.

What's best for Al, is best for all (or Al)

 

[Old Rocks]

the human race is only 10,000's years old (and I just threw that number out there) the last ice age happened like 12,000 years ago.....We are not special folks. The dinosaurs were around for millions of years. Earth changes and she dont give a rats ass about us. maybe we were just an experment? who knows....

With that attitude, Al Gore will be broke in a year. I don't want Al sniveling round my door looking for spare change.

Go back to your cave and think that one over again.

What's best for Al, is best for all (or Al)

Al Gore made his rather large fortune from investing in Google and other high tech stocks. He gets little and needs no income from his movie and lectures. Your idiocy is once again showing.

Charged particles are not what is heating the Earth. The blocking of the longwave radiation by CO2, CH4 and other GHGs that the Earth would normally re-radiate into space is what is creating the warming.

At the peak of the ice ages, the CO2 is at 180 ppm. At the peak of the interglacials, it is 280 ppm. At present, during the peak of an interglacial it has risen to 400 ppm. That is a rise of 120 ppm in 150 years. You cannot change the composition of the atmosphere that much and not have an effect.

Again, the largest Scientific Society of Physicists in the world, the American Institute of Physics, has this site with information on the history of the research on GHGs and the greenhouse effect.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[Smilodonfatalis]

the human race is only 10,000's years old (and I just threw that number out there) the last ice age happened like 12,000 years ago.....We are not special folks. The dinosaurs were around for millions of years. Earth changes and she dont give a rats ass about us. maybe we were just an experment? who knows....

You're off by a few hundred thousand years. As a species, Homo sapiens is at least 200,000 years old, and the immediate evolutionary ancestor probably wasn't much different.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I was talking about written and not cave drawings, back then we were just running aound naked, oops. my mistake the written is only like around 5,400 year old not 10,000. I wonder if their is any cave drawings of the last ice age?

 

[RollingThunder]

Interesting. I wonder how the "Science says that man's carbon emissions are causing Global Warming, and you MUST believe science" crowd will react?

Anyone with more than half a brain will react with gales of laughter at your gullible idiocy.

Principia Scientific International
Solar Storm Dumps Gigawatts into Earth's Upper Atmosphere - NASA Science
Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere

Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere

Wednesday, May 22, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence.

As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming. As illustrated by data collected using Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER), both carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), which are abundant in the earth's upper atmosphere, greenhouse gases reflect heating energy rather than absorb it.

"Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats," says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. "When the upper atmosphere (or 'thermosphere') heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space."

Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2

According to the data, up to 95 percent of solar radiation is literally bounced back into space by both CO2 and NO in the upper atmosphere. Without these necessary elements, in other words, the earth would be capable of absorbing potentially devastating amounts of solar energy that would truly melt the polar ice caps and destroy the planet.

"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet," write H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI. "[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS."

Dr. Hansen, of course, is an outspoken global warming activist who helped spark man-made climate change hysteria in the U.S. back in 1988. Just after the release of the new SABER study, however, Dr. Hansen conveniently retired from his career as a climatologist at NASA, and reportedly now plans to spend his time "on science," and on "drawing attention to [its] implications for young people."

LOLOLOLOL....do you take 'stupid pills', Little-Retard, or were you born this way?

Your idiotic OP is quoting an article written by Ethan Huff, a "staff writer" for Natural News, a health newsletter, where the article is posted. You are so extremely gullible, it is hilarious. You believe unquestioningly an article about climate science posted on a health newsletter website and you take the word, as if it was gospel, of some unknown non-scientist writer who is not in any way qualified, by education or experience, to pontificate on climate science, and ignore all of the actual climate scientists. Of course, I supposed you do probably consider it 'gospel' in your moronic cult of reality denial. The article you quote is completely bogus and very ignorant. If you go to the Natural News website and look at the original article, you see one sentence that the author emphasized in larger bold type. Let's take a look at how ridiculously wrong it is. Huff makes this ridiculous claim:
"Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2"

O course, that would mean the surface of the Earth would be frozen solid, you poor ignorant deluded retard. Here's the actual facts:

Sunlight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sunlight is a portion of the electromagnetic radiation given off by the Sun, particularly infrared, visible, and ultraviolet light. The total amount of energy received at ground level from the sun at the zenith is 1004 watts per square meter, which is composed of 527 watts of infrared radiation, 445 watts of visible light, and 32 watts of ultraviolet radiation. At the top of the atmosphere sunlight is about 30% more intense, with more than three times the fraction of ultraviolet (UV), with most of the extra UV consisting of biologically-damaging shortwave ultraviolet.

 

[Vandalshandle]

If you guys really want a hoot, spend some time browsing through the OP's third's source:

Global warming debunked: NASA report verifies carbon dioxide actually cools atmosphere

These guys are sort of like PETA on steroids! However, it is kind of hard to figure out exactly what their agenda is. I think that it is sort of , "All science, medicine, and government is trying to kill you". They will , however, teach you how to cure cancer by growing your own medicines and vegetables in your own garden. I am sure that they also have natural cures for heart disease, water on the knee and migranes. Be advised, however, that it is probably too late for you already if you have been drinking milk that is not raw.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere.

OK

The result was an overall cooling effect that completely contradicts claims made by NASA's own climatology division that greenhouse gases are a cause of global warming.

No it doesn't.

Almost all 'heating' radiation generated by sun is blocked from entering lower atmosphere by CO2

And the heating generated by the production of infrared radiation at the Earth's surface is also blocked by Co2, it just happens to be on the other side of the atmosphere from space. My fuck you read some shit written by some brain dead people.

"The shock revelation starkly contradicts the core proposition of the so-called greenhouse gas theory which claims that more CO2 means more warming for our planet," write H. Schreuder and J. O'Sullivan for PSI. "[T]his compelling new NASA data disproves that notion and is a huge embarrassment for NASA's chief climatologist, Dr. James Hansen and his team over at NASA's GISS."

If that's what the actual NASA report concluded, the quotation would be from the report, not from the report on the report. Whatever you do - don't link to the actual published paper - people would then find out it doesn't say what your buddies at PSI tell them it says.

 

[skookerasbil]

"Gigawatts" are insignificant on a global scale.

Total solar energy hitting the earth is a couple hundred _million_ gigawatts.

When CO2 in the outer atmosphere reflects "gigawatts" of charged particles from a solar storm for a couple days, that's insignificant compared to the effects of CO2 in the inner atmosphere holding back the outgoing radiation of millions of gigawatts of infrared.

GigafAiL sweetie........its going to snow in New York tonight!!!


Know what that means? It means people think that this whole global warming stuff is total BS.......because, except in the world of the environmentalist k00ks, perception is indeed 95% reality!!! Only the k00ks think, "Shit......this global warming is out of control!!!" when it is snowing a few days before June 1st. The vast majority say to themselves, "HOLY FUCK its cold tonight!!!"



Its like I always say......a significant amount of people will buy into this BS only when we see 3 weeks of 70 degree's in January in Alaska!!! And not a moment sooner.........assholes!!





Leaders of the EU met yesterday to discuss energy. And guess what? They are punting on green energy because it is fucking over their economies.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/05/is-europe-giving-up-on-green-energy.php


Which also means.......the science doesnt matter. Only those with connect the dots issues dont get it.

 

[RollingThunder]

"Gigawatts" are insignificant on a global scale.

Total solar energy hitting the earth is a couple hundred _million_ gigawatts.

When CO2 in the outer atmosphere reflects "gigawatts" of charged particles from a solar storm for a couple days, that's insignificant compared to the effects of CO2 in the inner atmosphere holding back the outgoing radiation of millions of gigawatts of infrared.

GigafAiL sweetie........its going to snow in New York tonight!!!

Y'know, slackjawed, you should really change your screen-name to GigafAil; it would be much more apt and fitting. It's hilarious that you still have weather and climate so confused.

The reasons for this unusual weather that certain parts of the US have been experiencing this spring have been shown to you several times before, like here, so, either you really are too retarded and brainwashed to be able to grasp the facts, or you're a paid troll, collecting a check from some front for the Koch brothers or Exxon to spread your master's moronic lies and misinformation.

Since I just know that your first retarded response will be to tell me my article is from April and must no longer apply, here is a view of the current movements of the jet stream.

The kookster is so retarded that he imagines that there aren't known scientific reasons for the very different spring we're having this year compared to the scorching spring we had last year.

March 2013 Falls Well Short of Last Year's Records
Accuweather
By Anthony Sagliani, Meteorologist
April 03, 2013
(excerpts)

In Washington, D.C. this year, cherry blossoms will reach their peak between April 3 and April 6. Last year they reached their peak by March 20, one of the earliest dates since record keeping began. As lingering winter cold keeps spring greenery away, many residents from Chicago to New York City remember it was only a year ago when record warmth had already snapped the landscape to life. Record temperatures began around the middle of March 2012 and continued for much of the month. According to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), by the time all was said and done, more than 7,500 record highs were broken across the U.S. March 2012 went down not only as the warmest March on record for many cities and towns throughout the eastern and central part of the country, but also as the warmest March for the entire United States. Over the last 30 days, a persistent chill over many of the same locations for March 2013 has led to more than 2,600 record cold temperatures. To put some of these numbers into better perspective, consider Chicago, Ill. For March 2012, the highest temperature the city had was an astounding 87 degrees. This March, the highest temperature was a meager 59 degrees. The March 2012 temperature average for Chicago was 53.5 degrees, or 15.6 degrees above normal. This year, the average temperature was only 32.6 degrees, or 5.3 degrees below normal. In New York City, March 2012 brought temperatures as high as 78 degrees, but this year the temperature failed to crack 60 degrees.

The driving mechanism for this March flip-flop was the jet stream, a thin river of air miles high that directs the path of not only weather systems, but temperatures as well. During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle.

On the flip side, March 2013 had the jet stream dip well to the south, running more along the Gulf of Mexico than anywhere else. This is more like a December or January weather pattern, so we ended up stuck with that kind of chill for much of the month.

Scientists link frozen spring to dramatic Arctic sea ice loss
Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot and cold
The Guardian
John Vidal, environment editor
Monday 25 March 2013
(excerpts)
Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. Both the extent and the volume of the sea ice that forms and melts each year in the Arctic Ocean fell to an historic low last autumn, and satellite records published on Monday by the National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado, show the ice extent is close to the minimum recorded for this time of year. "The sea ice is going rapidly. It's 80% less than it was just 30 years ago. There has been a dramatic loss. This is a symptom of global warming and it contributes to enhanced warming of the Arctic," said Jennifer Francis, research professor with the Rutgers Institute of Coastal and Marine Science. According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "This is what is affecting the jet stream and leading to the extreme weather we are seeing in mid-latitudes," she said. "It allows the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger. It's now at a near record position, so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around," she said.

Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year and warned in September that 2012's record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. She was backed by Vladimir Petoukhov, professor of Earth system analysis at Potsdam Institute in Germany, whose research suggests the loss of ice this year could be changing the direction of the jet stream. "The ice was at a record low last year and is now exceptionally low in some parts of the Arctic like the Labrador and Greenland seas. This could be one reason why anticyclones are developing," he said. The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs. The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists. A recent paper by the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also found that enhanced warming of the Arctic influenced weather across the northern hemisphere. "With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers. The Met Office's chief scientist has previously said the melting Arctic ice is in part responsible for the UK's recent colder winters. The possible links between Arctic sea ice loss and extreme weather were made as the UK's government's outgoing chief scientific adviser Sir John Beddington warned that the world could expect more extremes of weather. "The [current] variation we are seeing in temperature or rainfall is double the rate of the average. That suggests that we are going to have more droughts, we are going to have more floods, we are going to have more sea surges and we are going to have more storms." He said that said there was a "need for urgency" in tackling climate change. "These are the sort of changes that are going to affect us in quite a short timescale," he warned. Last year saw record heat, rainfall, drought and floods in the northern hemisphere.

 

[Wyatt earp]

How does it explain both? your article only explained 2013 not like in 2012 when the jet stream was far North.

Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot
and cold

 

[RollingThunder]

How does it explain both? your article only explained 2013 not like in 2012 when the jet stream was far North.

Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot
and cold

Perhaps the problem here is your lack of reading comprehension skills. The articles I cited do actually "explain both" so try reading them again all the way through and get someone to explain the big words to you.

here, I'll make it easy for you.

March 2013 Falls Well Short of Last Year's Records
Accuweather
By Anthony Sagliani, Meteorologist
April 03, 2013
(excerpts)

The driving mechanism for this March flip-flop was the jet stream, a thin river of air miles high that directs the path of not only weather systems, but temperatures as well. During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle.

On the flip side, March 2013 had the jet stream dip well to the south, running more along the Gulf of Mexico than anywhere else. This is more like a December or January weather pattern, so we ended up stuck with that kind of chill for much of the month.

Scientists link frozen spring to dramatic Arctic sea ice loss
Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot and cold
The Guardian
John Vidal, environment editor
Monday 25 March 2013
(excerpts)
Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "This is what is affecting the jet stream and leading to the extreme weather we are seeing in mid-latitudes," she said. "It allows the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger. It's now at a near record position, so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around," she said.

Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year and warned in September that 2012's record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs. The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists. A recent paper by the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also found that enhanced warming of the Arctic influenced weather across the northern hemisphere. "With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers. The Met Office's chief scientist has previously said the melting Arctic ice is in part responsible for the UK's recent colder winters. The possible links between Arctic sea ice loss and extreme weather were made as the UK's government's outgoing chief scientific adviser Sir John Beddington warned that the world could expect more extremes of weather. Last year saw record heat, rainfall, drought and floods in the northern hemisphere.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Bear,

If it turns out that climate change is, in fact, unrelated to man's activities on earth.....I will personally lobby the powers that be to disregard the difference in meaning between the words "to" and "too".

Deal?

 

[Wyatt earp]

How does it explain both? your article only explained 2013 not like in 2012 when the jet stream was far North.

Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot
and cold

Perhaps the problem here is your lack of reading comprehension skills. The articles I cited do actually "explain both" so try reading them again all the way through and get someone to explain the big words to you.

here, I'll make it easy for you.

March 2013 Falls Well Short of Last Year's Records
Accuweather
By Anthony Sagliani, Meteorologist
April 03, 2013
(excerpts)

The driving mechanism for this March flip-flop was the jet stream, a thin river of air miles high that directs the path of not only weather systems, but temperatures as well. During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle.

On the flip side, March 2013 had the jet stream dip well to the south, running more along the Gulf of Mexico than anywhere else. This is more like a December or January weather pattern, so we ended up stuck with that kind of chill for much of the month.

Scientists link frozen spring to dramatic Arctic sea ice loss
Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot and cold
The Guardian
John Vidal, environment editor
Monday 25 March 2013
(excerpts)
Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "This is what is affecting the jet stream and leading to the extreme weather we are seeing in mid-latitudes," she said. "It allows the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger. It's now at a near record position, so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around," she said.

Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year and warned in September that 2012's record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs. The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists. A recent paper by the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also found that enhanced warming of the Arctic influenced weather across the northern hemisphere. "With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers. The Met Office's chief scientist has previously said the melting Arctic ice is in part responsible for the UK's recent colder winters. The possible links between Arctic sea ice loss and extreme weather were made as the UK's government's outgoing chief scientific adviser Sir John Beddington warned that the world could expect more extremes of weather. Last year saw record heat, rainfall, drought and floods in the northern hemisphere.

I just read it a secound time..... So where does it explain why the jet stream moved so far north last year? what is happening in the south pacific to move the jet stream that much? the Antartica is not melting as fast as the Artic is, and why is the gulf heating up and cooling so fast over just two years? and the problem is you not me btw.....

 

[Wyatt earp]

Bear,

If it turns out that climate change is, in fact, unrelated to man's activities on earth.....I will personally lobby the powers that be to disregard the difference in meaning between the words "to" and "too".

Deal?

and when you do that could you please lobby the word police in ruling the the words "jeep" or "a tow motor" are not accetable words to use for a fucking "Forklift" thanks in advance...

 

[Wyatt earp]

Bear,

If it turns out that climate change is, in fact, unrelated to man's activities on earth.....I will personally lobby the powers that be to disregard the difference in meaning between the words "to" and "too".

Deal?

and when you are doing that dude could you lobby the powers to be to eliminate the Australian english slang for "whiteware" and thats what wrong with you socialist liberal dudes that never had a job... you just think your superior to every one else...

 

[RollingThunder]

How does it explain both? your article only explained 2013 not like in 2012 when the jet stream was far North.

Perhaps the problem here is your lack of reading comprehension skills. The articles I cited do actually "explain both" so try reading them again all the way through and get someone to explain the big words to you.

here, I'll make it easy for you.

March 2013 Falls Well Short of Last Year's Records
Accuweather
By Anthony Sagliani, Meteorologist
April 03, 2013
(excerpts)

The driving mechanism for this March flip-flop was the jet stream, a thin river of air miles high that directs the path of not only weather systems, but temperatures as well. During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle.

On the flip side, March 2013 had the jet stream dip well to the south, running more along the Gulf of Mexico than anywhere else. This is more like a December or January weather pattern, so we ended up stuck with that kind of chill for much of the month.

Scientists link frozen spring to dramatic Arctic sea ice loss
Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot and cold
The Guardian
John Vidal, environment editor
Monday 25 March 2013
(excerpts)
Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "This is what is affecting the jet stream and leading to the extreme weather we are seeing in mid-latitudes," she said. "It allows the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger. It's now at a near record position, so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around," she said.

Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year and warned in September that 2012's record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs. The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists. A recent paper by the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also found that enhanced warming of the Arctic influenced weather across the northern hemisphere. "With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers. The Met Office's chief scientist has previously said the melting Arctic ice is in part responsible for the UK's recent colder winters. The possible links between Arctic sea ice loss and extreme weather were made as the UK's government's outgoing chief scientific adviser Sir John Beddington warned that the world could expect more extremes of weather. Last year saw record heat, rainfall, drought and floods in the northern hemisphere.

I just read it a secound time.....

So then, your reading comprehension problem is quite extreme, it seems. You must be one of those really ignorant denier cult retards.

So where does it explain why the jet stream moved so far north last year?

WOW! Your reading comprehension abilities aren't just bad, they seem non-existent. Try again.
"During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle."
"Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "
"Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year..."
"The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs."
"The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists."
""With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers."

what is happening in the south pacific to move the jet stream that much?

LOLOLOLOLOL....you are so completely lost, it's really hilarious....

Both the articles I cited talked about the massive loss of sea ice in the Arctic as the cause of the shifts in the path of the jet stream and yet somehow you wind up thinking those shifts are being caused by something "happening in the South Pacific". LOLOLOLOL. Soooooo retarded.

and the problem is you not me btw.....

LOLOL...yeah, that's what all the little denier cult retards say when they can't comprehend the science.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Perhaps the problem here is your lack of reading comprehension skills. The articles I cited do actually "explain both" so try reading them again all the way through and get someone to explain the big words to you.

here, I'll make it easy for you.

March 2013 Falls Well Short of Last Year's Records
Accuweather
By Anthony Sagliani, Meteorologist
April 03, 2013
(excerpts)

The driving mechanism for this March flip-flop was the jet stream, a thin river of air miles high that directs the path of not only weather systems, but temperatures as well. During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle.

On the flip side, March 2013 had the jet stream dip well to the south, running more along the Gulf of Mexico than anywhere else. This is more like a December or January weather pattern, so we ended up stuck with that kind of chill for much of the month.

Scientists link frozen spring to dramatic Arctic sea ice loss
Melting sea ice, exposing huge parts of the ocean to the atmosphere, explains extreme weather both hot and cold
The Guardian
John Vidal, environment editor
Monday 25 March 2013
(excerpts)
Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "This is what is affecting the jet stream and leading to the extreme weather we are seeing in mid-latitudes," she said. "It allows the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger. It's now at a near record position, so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around," she said.

Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year and warned in September that 2012's record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs. The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists. A recent paper by the US government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also found that enhanced warming of the Arctic influenced weather across the northern hemisphere. "With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers. The Met Office's chief scientist has previously said the melting Arctic ice is in part responsible for the UK's recent colder winters. The possible links between Arctic sea ice loss and extreme weather were made as the UK's government's outgoing chief scientific adviser Sir John Beddington warned that the world could expect more extremes of weather. Last year saw record heat, rainfall, drought and floods in the northern hemisphere.

I just read it a secound time.....

So then, your reading comprehension problem is quite extreme, it seems. You must be one of those really ignorant denier cult retards.





WOW! Your reading comprehension abilities aren't just bad, they seem non-existent. Try again.
"During March 2012, the jet stream buckled so far north into Canada that it took on more of a summer pattern than winter. Constant southerly winds allowed tremendous warmth to build into areas that even touched the Arctic circle."
"Climate scientists have linked the massive snowstorms and bitter spring weather now being experienced across Britain and large parts of Europe and North America to the dramatic loss of Arctic sea ice. ...According to Francis and a growing body of other researchers, the Arctic ice loss adds heat to the ocean and atmosphere which shifts the position of the jet stream – the high-altitude river of air that steers storm systems and governs most weather in northern hemisphere. "
"Francis linked the Arctic temperature rises to extreme weather in mid latitudes last year..."
"The heavy snowfall and freezing temperatures which have marked March 2013 across the northern hemisphere are in stark contrast to March 2012 when many countries experienced their warmest ever springs."
"The hypothesis that wind patterns are being changed because melting Arctic sea ice has exposed huge swaths of normally frozen ocean to the atmosphere would explain both the extremes of heat and cold, say the scientists."
""With more solar energy going into the Arctic Ocean because of lost ice, there is reason to expect more extreme weather events, such as heavy snowfall, heat waves, and flooding in North America and Europe," said the researchers."

what is happening in the south pacific to move the jet stream that much?

LOLOLOLOLOL....you are so completely lost, it's really hilarious....

Both the articles I cited talked about the massive loss of sea ice in the Arctic as the cause of the shifts in the path of the jet stream and yet somehow you wind up thinking those shifts are being caused by something "happening in the South Pacific". LOLOLOLOL. Soooooo retarded.

and the problem is you not me btw.....

LOLOL...yeah, that's what all the little denier cult retards say when they can't comprehend the science.

you never proved shit. why do you add on to your posts? in simple terms why did the jet stream move so far north? in 2012? your the one is playing a game not I. stupid shit...

 

[Wyatt earp]

show me a link tard on how the south pacific moves the jet stream......

 

[Wyatt earp]

and you do know tard the jet stream relies on the earths rotation speed.......go back and learn... something..

 

[Wyatt earp]

dude you try to play the wrong guy.....

A New Spin on Earth's Rotation | LiveScience

After long-term observations of tidal oscillations of the Earth's rotation speed and atmospheric processes, N.S. Sidorenkov from the Hydrometeorological Center of Russia has devised a model that can supposedly forecast the weather from rotation data more accurately than current meteorological methods.