Then I assume you reject any relationship between CO2 and temperature.
Of course, that would be ignoring the points that CO2 absorbs IR and that increasing temperatures decrease carbonate solubility. And that would assume that you have some OTHER cause for the increasing temperatures of the last 150 years and for the rise in CO2 levels coincident with Milankovitch warming. Of course the Milankovitch cycles are only coincidental, right? We don't KNOW that orbital variations would cause warming or cooling. Particularly as SLOWLY as they change things. They've just been plotted at convenient scales to make it LOOK as if they're related.
Right?
Disappointing, Ian.
Of course, that would be ignoring the points that CO2 absorbs IR and that increasing temperatures decrease carbonate solubility. And that would assume that you have some OTHER cause for the increasing temperatures of the last 150 years and for the rise in CO2 levels coincident with Milankovitch warming. Of course the Milankovitch cycles are only coincidental, right? We don't KNOW that orbital variations would cause warming or cooling. Particularly as SLOWLY as they change things. They've just been plotted at convenient scales to make it LOOK as if they're related.
Right?
Disappointing, Ian.