Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What you think about the power of the President and the Constitution does not matter. The DOJ will operate independently of the President as it always does. Sessions and Barr and etc. all abandoned the President in the end.Yeah I did....not sure your point? The US COnstitution says the power of the Executive vest in A PResident...not the President and some unelected people at the DOJ, the DOJ was literally created to help the President execute his job.
Also, you might of missed it, but Nixon fired those people, because he had the power to, they worked for him
Then how come Bill Barr refused to go along with Trump's filthy lies about the election?Haha that’s the duty of all of govt. but the DOJ is specifically an executive branch agency, who answers directly to the president, the president is the executive branch
What the f are you talking about?Then how come Bill Barr refused to go along with Trump's filthy lies about the election?
Haha not much thinking is required, the constitution is clear, the power of the executive vest in a President. The DOJ is not independent, it’s part of the executive branch,What you think about the power of the President and the Constitution does not matter. The DOJ will operate independently of the President as it always does. Sessions and Barr and etc. all abandoned the President in the end.
What the fuck are YOU talking about?What the f are you talking about?
How about you read the Constitution? Explain to us all what Art 2 means when it says the power of the executive vest in A President? Wait do you even know what executive power means?
That's only going to happen in your mind.Haha not much thinking is required, the constitution is clear, the power of the executive vest in a President. The DOJ is not independent, it’s part of the executive branch, It doesn’t matter if Sessions or Barr disagree with the president, their jobs depended on the president, and any power they had they got from the president, like any AG. Where in the Constitution do you think the AG has their own executive power?
The US Constitution. Clearly it’s foreign to youWhat the fuck are YOU talking about?
Hahab yes Art 1 Section 1 of the US Constitution is only happening in my mind. Clearly the constitution isn’t anywhere near a dembots mindThat's only going to happen in your mind.
Your interpretation of what is going to happen will only occur in your mind, yes, because you are so clearly not in touch with reality.Hahab yes Art 1 Section 1 of the US Constitution is only happening in my mind. Clearly the constitution isn’t anywhere near a dembots mind
I’m not interpreting what is going to happen.Your interpretation of what is going to happen will only occur in your mind, yes, because you are so clearly not in touch with reality.
You don't know you're ass from a hole in the ground. President's since Nixon have had a hands off approach to DOJ. Then we have subhuman scumbag Trump who tried to use the department as his personal lawyers to get revenge on his enemies.The US Constitution. Clearly it’s foreign to you
Well now you are changing your narrative…but it’s still false. Trump never went after his political enemies wirh the DOJ…not like say Obama went after Bob McDonnell.You don't know you're ass from a hole in the ground. President's since Nixon have had a hands off approach to DOJ. Then we have subhuman scumbag Trump who tried to use the department as his personal lawyers to get revenge on his enemies.
That's what you support because you're a MAGA idiot.
Trump was behind Michael Cohen being returned to prison because he was writing a book exposing Trump for the criminal conman that he is.Well now you are changing your narrative…but it’s still false. Trump never went after his political enemies wirh the DOJ…not like say Obama went after Bob McDonnell.
You’re the idiot that thought the DOJ was independent and merely reported to the AG…wow…this is what we are dealing with, idiots that don’t even grasp 8th grade civics
The resignation of George Santos is an easy call, but Kevin McCarthy is protecting him because of the narrow Republican majority in the House.
More and more Republicans are calling for Santos to resign as more of his crimes, yes crimes, come to light. Santos did more than lie, he broke the law and it is just a matter of time before he is indicted.
The House vacancies clause says that when a House member resigns, the governor of the state must hold a special election.
Santos defeated his Democratic opponent 54.1 percent to 45.9 percent.
Even if and when Santos is indicted, there is no law which requires a House member under indictment to resign. Not even if they are ultimately convicted! So one wonders just how far into the gutter the GOP will follow Santos.
So let's get into his crimes.
First, the Santos campaign defrauded donors:
'We were duped': How George Santos raised money from wealthy GOP donors while lying about his resume
Congressman George Santos "duped" wealthy donors to contribute to his campaign. The lies helped his 2022 political groups raise nearly $3 million.www.cnbc.com
Wealthy donors received calls and emails from a man who said he was Dan Meyer, McCarthy’s chief of staff, during the 2020 and 2022 election cycles, according to people familiar with the matter. His name was actually Sam Miele, and he worked for Santos raising money for his campaign, according to one GOP donor who contributed to Santos’ campaign.
[snip]
The Republican would also tout his business record that’s now in question, including claims that he worked on Wall Street, as a way to encourage donors to contribute to his campaign, according to financiers and party operatives familiar with the matter.
[snip]
Brendan Fischer, a deputy executive director of the watchdog Documented, and Robert Maguire, a research director at campaign ethics watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, each told CNBC that the impersonation of McCarthy’s chief of staff could have broken the law.
“A person who misrepresented themselves as speaking on behalf of a candidate in order to raise money may have committed a criminal violation, and any other person who knowingly and willfully participated in the plan could also face criminal charges,” Fischer said in an email.
One wonders just how much of a cuck Kevin McCarthy is if he tolerates the Santos campaign impersonating his chief of staff.
Next, Santos donated $705,000 to his own campaign. The only problem is, he has no visible means of income for that kind of money. The most likely scenario is that he received money from straw donors illegally and funneled it to his campaign.
Who Is Rep.-Elect George Santos? His Résumé May Be Largely Fiction. (Published 2022)
Mr. Santos, a Republican from New York, says he’s the “embodiment of the American dream.” But he seems to have misrepresented a number of his career highlights.www.nytimes.com
Federal investigators are on the case. Santos's indictment is probably just a matter of time.
McCarthy needs to get out in front of this, or the GOP will continue to be the We Can Shoot Someone On Fifth Avenue party. No more red waves.
Hahah Michael Cohen was serving a sentence because he’s a criminal conman (that the demafasict have decided to partner with) he was only out because of Covid.Trump was behind Michael Cohen being returned to prison because he was writing a book exposing Trump for the criminal conman that he is.
He was still "out" wasen't he, dope?Hahah Michael Cohen was serving a sentence because he’s a criminal conman (that the demafasict have decided to partner with) he was only out because of Covid.
