Former NOAA Scientist Confirms Colleagues Manipulated Climate Records

[SSDD]

It is all models all the time with warmists...models all the way down.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

 

[SSDD]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

if it is from NOAA, chances are that it is fake...probably less instrumental coverage than they claim on the graph...

 

[skookerasbil]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

Lol......but FaiL Sunset....i can't find an emoticon wearing glasses

Really though it's not an issue of eyesight for ED.... like all of the climate crusaders in this forum, they are fine with conveniently ignoring anything that doesn't fit the established narrative.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It is all models all the time with warmists...models all the way down.

It has been for some time, sadly. They do not address empirical evidence as it disproves every attempt, so far, to prove mans influence. If it is not manipulable for the cause it is not used.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

Ooops, I called the GHCNM chart a Model, it is actually the temperature based data.

THIS is a model, the other chart:

As you can see they infilled made up numbers in large areas on it. Satellite data shows it was much cooler

 

[skookerasbil]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

Ooops, I called the GHCNM chart a Model, it is actually the temperature based data.

THIS is a model, the other chart:

View attachment 187886

As you can see they infilled made up numbers in large areas on

Ghey

And note where they highlight RECORD HEAT?

In central Africa.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yuk...yuk.....that the climate change industry is engaged in fakery is not in dispute outside the club of the religion.....they promote the narrative by publicly displaying fake maps all the time. You know... those consistently real colorful ones....

realclimatescience.com/2017/02/nasa-noaa-climate-data

Really though this back and forth exercise on the credibility of the data really is akin to an exercise in group navel contemplation......or internet chatter if you prefer. Hobby stuff.....

In the end the only thing that matters is what the public thinks.... and that is the big problem for people who embrace the thinking of the religion.....like Ed. Waaasaay too many people see this as natural variability...... the evidence on that is staggering.

So really when it comes right down to it the whole debate about rigged data or straight data is immaterial in the real world.

Sorry s0ns.... just sayin'​

As I have pointed out so many times before, when the Right get caught lying, they simply deflect and lie some more.

Just as the lie in the OP had a fake chart when it was originally told, the above link has a fake station map.

The actual NOAA temperature station map:

Fake data map from your above link showing almost no temperature stations in Africa;

That chart you call fake is straight from the NOAA. It says so right at the bottom left corner of the chart, which by the way is a MODEL!

Just because there is a station there doesn't mean it is active. You need to show that they actually work and collect every day.

You are having serious ocular difficulties today

Ooops, I called the GHCNM chart a Model, it is actually the temperature based data.

THIS is a model, the other chart:

View attachment 187886

As you can see they infilled made up numbers in large areas on it. Satellite data shows it was much cooler

HOMOGENIZATION AND INFILLING are always positive influences on the average sum. Especially when they are covering large areas with no verification ability.