Flynn definately broke laws

[easyt65]

Oh, what is the most amusing is how the OP lied in the title, only to admit it in his 1st paragraph.

SSDD - false accusations supported by NO EVIDENCE. Snowflakes have no shame.

 

[radical right]

Oh, what is the most amusing is how the OP lied in the title, only to admit it in his 1st paragraph.

SSDD - false accusations supported by NO EVIDENCE. Snowflakes have no shame.

Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86

 

[nat4900]

Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86

.......and, supposedly, $500,000 from Turkey.....

 

[radical right]

Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86

.......and, supposedly, $500,000 from Turkey.....

That too. And meanwhile Flynn also failed to register as a foreign agent. Or get permission from State and DOD to travel to Russia.

 

[Divine Wind]

Oh, what is the most amusing is how the OP lied in the title, only to admit it in his 1st paragraph.

SSDD - false accusations supported by NO EVIDENCE. Snowflakes have no shame.

Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86

Correct, and Hillary was negligent with classified material and lied about it not being in those emails she deleted. So what? Unless charges are filed, it's all good, eh?

IMO, all should be indicted and convicted, but that's not how it works in Washington, DC today. Sad isn't it?

 

[Blackrook]

The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.

Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.

Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.

House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law

But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."

In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.

Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.

This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.

It's too bad you can't spell "definitely" dumbass.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Again, no evidence - just accusation.

Benghazi

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Shut up wasting our time and post evidence to support your false claims.

Vince Foster...

 

[Divine Wind]

Whitewater

Troopergate

Travelgate

Waco

Ruby Ridge

 

[Divine Wind]

Again, no evidence - just accusation.

Benghazi

Top 10 Hillary Clinton scandals exposed by WikiLeaks
The ongoing WikiLeaks dump of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails has exposed the corruption and cronyism of her campaign and time in office. Everyday there are more revelations of wrongdoing, so much so, it’s hard to keep up with. So here’s the top 10 double-dealing, dishonest discoveries uncovered thus far.

1. Mrs. Clinton had cozy and improper relationship with the mainstream media.

CNN contributor and then adviser of the Democratic National Committee Donna Brazile gave the Clinton campaign advanced notice of a CNN town hall question that she thought may give Mrs. Clinton pause. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign lauded a New York Times reporter for “teeing up” stories for them, and ABC’s George Stephanopoulos for hammering home their talking points. The Boston Globe helped Mrs. Clinton’s team maximize her presence in New England during the primaries and CNBC’s John Harwood bragged to them about dogging Donald Trump during a Republican primary debate he moderated.....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is the thread.

Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?

Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?

Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?

There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.

Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.

Nope.
It's specific to Flynn.
Flynn definately broke laws

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is the thread.

Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?

Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?

Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?

There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.

Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.

she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began

Well, duh.
The DNC is the Democratic establishment.
She was the establishment candidate running against an independent, anti-establishment candidate.

The fact that you find that dynamic scandalous only serves to highlight your lack of understanding of what the establishment is.

If you would have only given five minutes of critical thought to that, you would have saved yourself months of grief.

 

[Divine Wind]

That is the thread.

Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?

Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?

Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?

There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.

Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.

Nope.
It's specific to Flynn.
Flynn definately broke laws

The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Whitewater

Troopergate

Travelgate

Waco

Ruby Ridge

Did you say something?

I only heard passing whispers on the winds of long past grief.

 

[Divine Wind]

That is the thread.

Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?

Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?

Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?

There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.

Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.

she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began

Well, duh.
The DNC is the Democratic establishment.
She was the establishment candidate running against an independent, anti-establishment candidate.

The fact that you find that dynamic scandalous only serves to highlight your lack of understanding of what the establishment is.

If you would have only given five minutes of critical thought to that, you would have saved yourself months of grief.

Yep, the DNC is free to select their own candidate even if they lie to their members about how "democratic" their selection process is for nominations.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That is the thread.

Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?

Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?

Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?

There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.

Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.

The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.

Nope.
It's specific to Flynn.
Flynn definately broke laws

The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?

The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?

You are truly a dope.
In this very thread you simultaineously ascribed a standard of guilt for Clinton and then violated the very same standard in defense of Flynn.


Dope.

 

[OKTexas]

The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.

Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.

Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.

House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law

But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."

In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.

Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.

This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.

But the real question now is, was there intent or did he do it because he just didn't know better like the hildabitch?

 

[Divine Wind]

You are truly a dope.
In this very thread you simultaineously ascribed a standard of guilt for Clinton and then violated the very same standard in defense of Flynn.


Dope.

Then you should ignore my posts.

Not quite correct. I simply pointed out that there is a lot of corruption in Washington on both sides and, if you'd truly been reading my posts, I advocated rooting out all of it regardless of party. You want to play partisan politics with a moderate. Go for it. You'll just look more partisan.

 

[Divine Wind]

The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.

Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.

Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.

House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law

But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."

In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.

Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.

This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.

But the real question now is, was there intent or did he do it because he just didn't know better like the hildabitch?

I'll wait for the court decision...or more likely the plea deal, but he's a General, not a political dumbass. If he did as accused, then no doubt he did it with cognizance.

 

[Old Rocks]

Whitewater

Troopergate

Travelgate

Waco

Ruby Ridge

Ruby Ridge? That was under Bush 1.