Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, what is the most amusing is how the OP lied in the title, only to admit it in his 1st paragraph.
SSDD - false accusations supported by NO EVIDENCE. Snowflakes have no shame.
Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86
.......and, supposedly, $500,000 from Turkey.....
Correct, and Hillary was negligent with classified material and lied about it not being in those emails she deleted. So what? Unless charges are filed, it's all good, eh?Oh, what is the most amusing is how the OP lied in the title, only to admit it in his 1st paragraph.
SSDD - false accusations supported by NO EVIDENCE. Snowflakes have no shame.
Even you pointed out yesterday that Flynn failed to disclose $33,000 in payments from the russians, on his SF-86
It's too bad you can't spell "definitely" dumbass.The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.
Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.
Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.
House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law
But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."
In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.
Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.
This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.
BenghaziAgain, no evidence - just accusation.
Vince Foster...Shut up wasting our time and post evidence to support your false claims.
Top 10 Hillary Clinton scandals exposed by WikiLeaksBenghaziAgain, no evidence - just accusation.
The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?That is the thread.
Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?
Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?
There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.
Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.
The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.
The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?That is the thread.
Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?
Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?
There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.
Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.
she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began
The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?That is the thread.
Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?
Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?
There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.
Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.
The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.
Nope.
It's specific to Flynn.
Flynn definately broke laws
Whitewater
Troopergate
Travelgate
Waco
Ruby Ridge
Yep, the DNC is free to select their own candidate even if they lie to their members about how "democratic" their selection process is for nominations.The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?That is the thread.
Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?
Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?
There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.
Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began
Well, duh.
The DNC is the Democratic establishment.
She was the establishment candidate running against an independent, anti-establishment candidate.
The fact that you find that dynamic scandalous only serves to highlight your lack of understanding of what the establishment is.
If you would have only given five minutes of critical thought to that, you would have saved yourself months of grief.
The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC. One reason Clinton lost was because even Democrats don't trust her. The entire debacle about how she was picked by the DNC before campaign even began ticked off a lot of Democrats and, especially, Bernie supporters.Correct. Are you saying you always have and always will stay 100% on topic and never use other examples for context? If I can prove you've been off-topic, will you admit to being a hypocrite?That is the thread.
Flynn broke the law by not disclosing foreign payments. That's not in question at all. The real question is, how was the Trump team not able to know this and how were they able to get Flynn a clearance without lying?
Flynn may have broken the law. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet. Yes, it looks bad for him, but is the Left Wing so far gone they no longer believe in innocent until proven guilty?
There is no context that involves Clinton when talking about Flynn.
Corruption and Cronyism, much less crimes, are wrong. I'm truly sorry you disagree.
The context is corruption, cronyism and crime in Washington, DC.
Nope.
It's specific to Flynn.
Flynn definately broke laws
The OP link isn't so definitive. Can you cite the court record of his conviction?
The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.
Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.
Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.
House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law
But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."
In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.
Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.
This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.
Then you should ignore my posts.You are truly a dope.
In this very thread you simultaineously ascribed a standard of guilt for Clinton and then violated the very same standard in defense of Flynn.
Dope.
I'll wait for the court decision...or more likely the plea deal, but he's a General, not a political dumbass. If he did as accused, then no doubt he did it with cognizance.The House Oversight Committee's top-ranking Republican and Democrat said in a joint press conference on Tuesday that former national security adviser Michael Flynn appears to have broken the law by not disclosing payments he received from Russia in his 2016 security clearance application.
Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the committee's chair, and ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings told reporters that they had obtained the SF86 security clearance application form that Flynn filed in January 2016, one month after he traveled to Moscow to speak at a gala celebrating the 10th anniversary of Russia's state-owned news agency, Russia Today.
Documents the committee obtained later from Flynn's speaking bureau revealed that Flynn was paid approximately $33,000 for the speaking engagement. But they said he appears not to have disclosed those funds on his security clearance application.
House Oversight chairman: I've seen 'no evidence' that Michael Flynn 'complied' with the law
But the Trump administration had so far "refused to provide the committee with a single piece of paper in response to our bipartisan request," Cummings said, "and that is unacceptable."
In a letter to the Oversight Committee dated April 19, 2017, White House Director of Legislative Affairs Marc Short referred the committee to the Defense Department for the documents related to Flynn's security clearance and "contacts with foreign nationals" that predated his time at the White House.
Short wrote that the White House would be "unable to accommodate" the committee's requests for information about Flynn's contacts with foreign nationals after he was appointed national security adviser. Short said much of that information is classified.
This admin is totally frightened by the fact that if Flynn has to face a judge over his lies, he may turn states evidence.
But the real question now is, was there intent or did he do it because he just didn't know better like the hildabitch?