First the cold, then the snow. Oh My!!! God is fucking with Global Warming.....Again...

[mamooth]

Notice that this loudmouth along with his two buddies who gives him the winner votes, NEVER once tries to debate post one at all?

We refuted it directly, by pointing out only the most gutless and retarded denier cult snowflakes try the "Look! A snowflake! Global warming is a hoax!" argument.

Obviously, you're a big fan of that argument. After all, what else do you have?

Notice you and your same two buddies also ignore my post about the 2001 IPCC projection.....

Winters are milder, so what's your point? The fact that winter still exists does not refute the fact that winter temperatures are, on the average, now higher. It's not a difficult concept to grasp, so perhaps you should ask a grownup for help with it.

 

[mamooth]

The notion that you have accurate to a tenth of a degree data set dating back 150 is a fiction.

But we clearly do. That fact that you deny it just means you're a moron on the topic of statistics. We've explained it to you before, so there's no point trying again. You're simply too damn stupid to grasp the basics.

Yes, we understand that you're also unable to understand that you're an idiot. That's classic Dunning-Kruger Syndrome. Stupid people are usually too 'effin stupid to understand how stupid they are. You actually think you're intelligent, so we get this endless belligerent stupidity from you.

That NOAA reset the baseline a few years ago to make the numbers work is beyond fiction- its fraud

See? More stupid on your part. Your cult told you a deranged story, and you believed it, because you fall for everything they tell you.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The notion that you have accurate to a tenth of a degree data set dating back 150 is a fiction.

But we clearly do. That fact that you deny it just means you're a moron on the topic of statistics. We've explained it to you before, so there's no point trying again. You're simply too damn stupid to grasp the basics.

Yes, we understand that you're also unable to understand that you're an idiot. That's classic Dunning-Kruger Syndrome. Stupid people are usually too 'effin stupid to understand how stupid they are. You actually think you're intelligent, so we get this endless belligerent stupidity from you.

That NOAA reset the baseline a few years ago to make the numbers work is beyond fiction- its fraud

See? More stupid on your part. Your cult told you a deranged story, and you believed it, because you fall for everything they tell you.

"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The notion that you have accurate to a tenth of a degree data set dating back 150 is a fiction.

But we clearly do. That fact that you deny it just means you're a moron on the topic of statistics. We've explained it to you before, so there's no point trying again. You're simply too damn stupid to grasp the basics.

Yes, we understand that you're also unable to understand that you're an idiot. That's classic Dunning-Kruger Syndrome. Stupid people are usually too 'effin stupid to understand how stupid they are. You actually think you're intelligent, so we get this endless belligerent stupidity from you.

That NOAA reset the baseline a few years ago to make the numbers work is beyond fiction- its fraud

See? More stupid on your part. Your cult told you a deranged story, and you believed it, because you fall for everything they tell you.

...and that's how we get an accurate to a tenth of a degree temperature back in 1880.

 

[mamooth]

...and that's how we get an accurate to a tenth of a degree temperature back in 1880.

Like I said, you're too 'effing stupid to understand basic statistics. You just keep reinforcing that point.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

...and that's how we get an accurate to a tenth of a degree temperature back in 1880.

Like I said, you're too 'effing stupid to understand basic statistics. You just keep reinforcing that point.

Uh huh. All they had to do was check the temperature reading under an electron microscope

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If you squint, you won't even notice how NOAA altered the data set to fit their flawed, failed theory

 

[Crick]

Baby, it's getting warmer outside...

 

[Asclepias]

No. Both of those are just weather. It doesnt become climate until those records become the new norm.

Since the temperature record has been so corrupted, exactly how would you identify a new norm? And are you aware, that on earth, ice at one or both poles is not normal..in fact, if you have a polar ice cap on earth, you are officially in an ice age. Ice is the anomaly on earth, not the norm. And why would you object to getting out of an ice age?

Norm is from the perspective of humans. As long as humans have existed there has been ice at one or both poles so to us that would be normal. The transition from an artificially induced warming trend from an ice age would cause rising seas and the destruction of certain populations

So you trying to tell us humans knew about the ice at the poles?

How did they know..


.

Science

They were eating mud..

Scientifically thats good for you. Not getting your point though?

7 Surprising Health Benefits of Eating Dirt | Babble

 

[Wyatt earp]

Baby, it's getting warmer outside...

How cute still trying to compare local temperature records of 1880 with global temperature records of 2018.



.

 

[Crick]

Baby, it's getting warmer outside...

How cute still trying to compare local temperature records of 1880 with global temperature records of 2018.

So you're suggesting that in 1880 there was only one thermometer on the planet? What do you believe makes it impossible to calculate a global temperature for 1880?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Baby, it's getting warmer outside...

How cute still trying to compare local temperature records of 1880 with global temperature records of 2018.

So you're suggesting that in 1880 there was only one thermometer on the planet? What do you believe makes it impossible to calculate a global temperature for 1880?

It's obvious your a narcissist..


Where are the temperature records in 1880 of the southern hemisphere?

They don't exist.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Baby, it's getting warmer outside...

How cute still trying to compare local temperature records of 1880 with global temperature records of 2018.

So you're suggesting that in 1880 there was only one thermometer on the planet? What do you believe makes it impossible to calculate a global temperature for 1880?

It's obvious your a narcissist..


Where are the temperature records in 1880 of the southern hemisphere?

They don't exist.

This is going to get you mad




The first recorded thermometer was produced by the Italian, Santorio Santorio (1561-1636) who was one of a group of Venetian scientists working at the end of the Sixteenth Century. As with many inventions the thermometer came about through the work of many scientists and was improved upon by many others.



1596 Galileo Galilei and the first thermoscope
Galileo Galilei is often claimed to be the inventor of the thermometer. However the instrument he invented could not strictly be called a thermometer: to be a thermometer an instrument must measure temperature differences; Galileo's instrument did not do this, but merely indicated temperature differences. His instrument should rightly be called a thermoscope.

The Thermoscope
The predecessor to the thermometer, the thermoscope is a thermometer without a scale; it indicates differences in temperature only ie it can show if the temperature is higher, lower or the same, but unlike a thermometer it cannot measure the difference nor can the result be recorded for future reference. The thermoscope was widely used by a group of scientists in Venice that included Galileo. It was only a small step from the thermoscope to the thermometer.



1612 Santorio Santorio - the first thermometer
The Italian, Santorio Santorio (1561-1636) is generally credited with having applied a scale to an air thermoscope at least as early as 1612 and thus is thought to be the inventor of the thermometer as a temperature measuring device. Santorio's instrument was an air thermometer. Its accuracy was poor as the effects of varying air pressure on the thermometer were not understood at that time.



1654 The first sealed liquid-in-glass thermometer
The sealed liquid-in-glass thermometer, more familiar to us today, was first produced in 1654 by the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand II (1610-1670). His thermometer had an alcohol filling. Although this was a significant development his thermometer was inaccurate and there was no standardised scale in use.



1714 The first mercury thermometer
Gabriel Fahrenheit (1686-1736) was the first person to make a thermometer using mercury. The more predictable expansion of mercury combined with improved glassworking techniques led to a much more accurate thermometer.

Fahrenheit - the first Standard Thermometer Scale
Fahrenheit used the newly discovered fixed points to devise the first standard temperature scale for his thermometer. Fahrenheit divided the freezing and boiling points of water into 180 degrees. 32 was chosen as the the figure for the lower fixed point as this produced a scale that would not fall below zero even when measuring the lowest possible temperatures that he could produce in his laboratory - a mixture of ice, salt and water. It is sometimes suggested that Fahrenheit divided his scale into 100 degrees using blood temperature (incorrectly measured) and the freezing point of water as fixed points - this is not true. The Fahrenheit scale is still in use today.



1731 The Réamur Scale
In 1731 the Frenchman, René Antoine Ferchauld de Réamur (1683-1757) proposed a thermometer scale on which the freezing point of water was 0° and the boiling point was 80°. The Réamur scale is not in use today.



1742 The Celsius Scale
In 1742 a Swedish scientist named Anders Celsius (1701-1744) devised a thermometer scale dividing the freezing and boiling points of water into 100 degrees. Celsius chose 0 degrees for the boiling point of water, and 100 degrees for the freezing point. A year later, the Frenchman Jean Pierre Cristin (1683-1755) inverted the Celsius scale to produce the Centigrade scale used today (freezing point 0°, boiling point 100°). By international agreement in 1948 Cristin's adapted scale became known as Celsius and is still in use today.



1848 The Absolute Temperature Scale or Kelvin Scale
In 1848 Sir William Thomson, Baron Kelvin of Largs, Lord Kelvin of Scotland (1824 - 1907) proposed the absolute temperature scale with zero degrees being the theoretical lowest temperature possible where molecular motion ceases. Kelvin defined 1 Kelvin degree as being equal to one Celsius. The Degree Kelvin is the current Standard Unit of temperature measurement.

 

[Crick]

Why would this get me mad? I was attempting to determine why you thought a global temperatures could not be determined for 1880? -- why you thought those data to be local?

 

[mamooth]

Uh huh. All they had to do was check the temperature reading under an electron microscope

Variance of an average = individual variance / sqrt(Number of measurements)

If you don't understand what that means, you shouldn't be bothering the grownups.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Uh huh. All they had to do was check the temperature reading under an electron microscope

Variance of an average = individual variance / sqrt(Number of measurements)

If you don't understand what that means, you shouldn't be bothering the grownups.

LOL.

What a clown! You're quoting a methodology and implying those were the magic beans used for your flawed data set.

 

[Crick]

He's explaining that the average of many observations can have greater resolution than the original values. I'm pretty sure you've been told this before when you've brought up this same ignorant complaint.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He's explaining that the average of many observations can have greater resolution than the original values. I'm pretty sure you've been told this before when you've brought up this same ignorant complaint.

You're saying you have "many observations' of for example, Arctic or deep ocean or rain forest, or Sahara temperature from 1880, 1900 1920? etc or you're just making that up like you always do?

I'm pretty sure I've called your bluff every time and you squid inked yourself away

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How the fuck is the "Warming" credible when it's based on a fraud?

 

[Crick]

Frank, even the folks on your side of the argument would acknowledge that you've never called anyone's bluff. I suspect there are thousands of temperature readings available for the world of 1880 and that most of them were originally taken to a tenth of a degree.