Father arrested at school board meeting for exceeding his allotted two minutes

I soon as I saw the subject line, I just KNEW it was typical conservative misdirection BS. Sure enough, I read the story, and the man was arrested for disorderly conduct. The only thing I wonder at this point is whether or not the man WANTED to get arrested in order to bring more attention to this issue. Hell, it wouldn't surprise me if he had already lined up some RW organization to take up his cause and sue the school district.

So the best idea you can come up with to handle a guy who is not shouting or threatening in any way is to arrest him? Really?

Actually it was the man's idea.

What a stupid response. Had he asked the cop to shoot him would that have been ok since he asked? How bout a little police brutality? Perhaps a few extra trumped up bogus charges? How bout hog tied? All per request of course
 
and dare the officer to arrest him....dont skip that inconvenient fact

Lol dared the officer?

He stood (sat actually) his ground. The threat of arrest was completely retarded. Much like most of the liberal responses in this thread.

it didnt look like he was being arrested till he stated " you will have to be arrested. Looks like he was being asked to leave.

Ok stood his ground and dared the officer to arrest him. So the Officer did...Had you watched the video you can clearly hear him state what i quoted.

You have nothing..

He does have the desire to pick fights... that's about all that is left apparently.
 
So the best idea you can come up with to handle a guy who is not shouting or threatening in any way is to arrest him? Really?

Actually it was the man's idea.

What a stupid response. Had he asked the cop to shoot him would that have been ok since he asked? How bout a little police brutality? Perhaps a few extra trumped up bogus charges? How bout hog tied? All per request of course

I see you went with the retard defense.
 
I have common sense.

YOU have nothing but liberal bullshit excuses for abuse of power and COMPLETELY ignore the reason this all came about.

ok

You're an idiot. Like that needed demonstrating.
An officer arrests someone on suspicion of committing a crime. What crime did the man commit? Nothing. There was no crime. There should have been no arrest. Escorted outside, yes. Arrested, no.
See the difference?

I agree with you..and stated that arresting him was a bit much, but the man dared him to arrest him...so it is what it is.
 
The passage in the book is relevant to the story. Those who knew how Picoult writes would know this.
 
This has to do with the Fourth Reicht of smut. The new religion's zero-tolerance policy. Just like in Nazi Germany, anyone speaking out against the party's values were arrested.

Get used to it because if this cult isn't checked, it's going to keep getting more and more alarming. And don't think they won't come to witch-hunt you. You WILL allow their sexual agenda into your kids' minds in school or you WILL be punished.
 
The title of the article and thread is a lie. He was arrested for out of control, belligerent behavior, not for protesting about a book his daughter was reading in school. If the rest of the parents were okay with the book, then this guy hasn't any ground to stand on. If he dislikes the orientation and curriculum of the school, he should home school her or put her in another school, most likely private and religious, where he finds the curriculum compatible with his beliefs. He doesn't get to modify the curriculum based on his private beliefs when the rest of the parents are fine with it.
 
Last edited:
The passage in the book is relevant to the story. Those who knew how Picoult writes would know this.

That has absolutely nothing to do with this material being age appropriate.

Besides you're not even American so your opinion on the matter is moot.

Your condemnation is moot of a a correct evaluation of the book.

You just get dumber & dumber as time passes. Of course it's germane to THE BOOK.
That does not make it age appropriate for tweens unless you're a child molesting fucked in the head pervert. Are you?
 
The passage in the book is relevant to the story. Those who knew how Picoult writes would know this.

That has absolutely nothing to do with this material being age appropriate.

Besides you're not even American so your opinion on the matter is moot.

My opinion is relevant. Kids over here are not bound in cotton wool, treated like they are going to become whores if they learn about birth control.
 
That has absolutely nothing to do with this material being age appropriate.

Besides you're not even American so your opinion on the matter is moot.

Your condemnation is moot of a a correct evaluation of the book.

You just get dumber & dumber as time passes. Of course it's germane to THE BOOK.
That does not make it age appropriate for tweens unless you're a child molesting fucked in the head pervert. Are you?

Your comment and evaluation are not germane, Grampa. You don't have the education or smarts to make such evaluations. Please step along.
 
Your condemnation is moot of a a correct evaluation of the book.

You just get dumber & dumber as time passes. Of course it's germane to THE BOOK.
That does not make it age appropriate for tweens unless you're a child molesting fucked in the head pervert. Are you?

Your comment and evaluation are not germane, Grampa. You don't have the education or smarts to make such evaluations. Please step along.

I have enough education to see a fraud and a schmuck when I see one, and I see one EVERY TIME you or Bucs post.
 
The passage in the book is relevant to the story. Those who knew how Picoult writes would know this.

That has absolutely nothing to do with this material being age appropriate.

Besides you're not even American so your opinion on the matter is moot.

My opinion is relevant. Kids over here are not bound in cotton wool, treated like they are going to become whores if they learn about birth control.

Your opinion is shit aussie. Go wrangle an aligator or something. Make yourself useful
 
So the best idea you can come up with to handle a guy who is not shouting or threatening in any way is to arrest him? Really?

Actually it was the man's idea.

What a stupid response. Had he asked the cop to shoot him would that have been ok since he asked? How bout a little police brutality? Perhaps a few extra trumped up bogus charges? How bout hog tied? All per request of course

First, the title of the thread is misleading at best. It is yellow journalism and propaganda. It states an untruth as if it were truth; it is intentionally misleading. The man was out of control and disruptive to the meeting. He was not abiding by the rules of taking his turn and the delegated amount of time to speak.

Second, it is not the school board who arrested him. The police make the decision whether or not to arrest someone. The school board cannot and does not order the police to arrest someone. This man was disorderly and belligerent with the police. He was arrested, by the police at their discretion, for disorderly conduct, not because he was voicing opposition to the book taught in his child's school.
 
Lol, the man was out of control eh? You CLEARLY have no idea what you're talking about Esmeralda.

Really? I saw the video. He was out of control. Your idea of out of control is probably different because you are an aggressive, poorly behaved individual, something that is perfectly clear from your behavior on this board. Other people, civilized people, know what is appropriate, in control behavior that respects those around them and is suitable for the specific situation. You are the one who has no idea--no idea how to act like a civilized, respectful person.
 
That has absolutely nothing to do with this material being age appropriate.

Besides you're not even American so your opinion on the matter is moot.

My opinion is relevant. Kids over here are not bound in cotton wool, treated like they are going to become whores if they learn about birth control.

Your opinion is shit aussie. Go wrangle an aligator or something. Make yourself useful

Crocodiles, no alligators in Australia, you ignorant twit.
 
The title of the article and thread is a lie. He was arrested for out of control, belligerent behavior, not for protesting about a book his daughter was reading in school. If the rest of the parents were okay with the book, then this guy hasn't any ground to stand on. If he dislikes the orientation and curriculum of the school, he should home school her or put her in another school, most likely private and religious, where he finds the curriculum compatible with his beliefs. He doesn't get to modify the curriculum based on his private beliefs when the rest of the parents are fine with it.

Indeed.

Consistent with the fact that the OP is a liar.
 
OP- You ignorant ugly American dupes have to stick together. Others like international input...jeebus Pubs and their dupes are a disgrace...you'd think hate and stupidity were a virtue.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top