excalibur Challenging UN, Study Finds Sun—not CO2—May Be Behind Global Warming

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,179
34,509
2,290
It is the sun, stupid.



The sun and not human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) may be the main cause of warmer temperatures in recent decades, according to a new study with findings that sharply contradict the conclusions of the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The peer-reviewed paper, produced by a team of almost two dozen scientists from around the world, concluded that previous studies did not adequately consider the role of solar energy in explaining increased temperatures.

The new study was released just as the UN released its sixth “Assessment Report,” known as AR6, that once again argued in favor of the view that man-kind’s emissions of CO2 were to blame for global warming. The report said human responsibility was “unequivocal.”

But the new study casts serious doubt on the hypothesis.

Calling the blaming of CO2 by the IPCC “premature,” the climate scientists and solar physicists argued in the new paper that the UN IPCC’s conclusions blaming human emissions were based on “narrow and incomplete data about the Sun’s total irradiance.”

Indeed, the global climate body appears to display deliberate and systemic bias in what views, studies, and data are included in its influential reports, multiple authors told The Epoch Times in a series of phone and video interviews.

“Depending on which published data and studies you use, you can show that all of the warming is caused by the sun, but the IPCC uses a different data set to come up with the opposite conclusion,” lead study author Ronan Connolly, Ph.D. told The Epoch Times in a video interview.

“In their insistence on forcing a so-called scientific consensus, the IPCC seems to have decided to consider only those data sets and studies that support their chosen narrative,” he added.

...


 
It is the sun, stupid.


The sun and not human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) may be the main cause of warmer temperatures in recent decades, according to a new study with findings that sharply contradict the conclusions of the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The peer-reviewed paper, produced by a team of almost two dozen scientists from around the world, concluded that previous studies did not adequately consider the role of solar energy in explaining increased temperatures.
The new study was released just as the UN released its sixth “Assessment Report,” known as AR6, that once again argued in favor of the view that man-kind’s emissions of CO2 were to blame for global warming. The report said human responsibility was “unequivocal.”
But the new study casts serious doubt on the hypothesis.
Calling the blaming of CO2 by the IPCC “premature,” the climate scientists and solar physicists argued in the new paper that the UN IPCC’s conclusions blaming human emissions were based on “narrow and incomplete data about the Sun’s total irradiance.”
Indeed, the global climate body appears to display deliberate and systemic bias in what views, studies, and data are included in its influential reports, multiple authors told The Epoch Times in a series of phone and video interviews.
“Depending on which published data and studies you use, you can show that all of the warming is caused by the sun, but the IPCC uses a different data set to come up with the opposite conclusion,” lead study author Ronan Connolly, Ph.D. told The Epoch Times in a video interview.
“In their insistence on forcing a so-called scientific consensus, the IPCC seems to have decided to consider only those data sets and studies that support their chosen narrative,” he added.
...


Oh yeah, those frauds.


Jan 2021
 
The climate will never remain the same on earth no matter what we do and don't do...so we had better get better at living with it instead of trying to gain power and riches with it...

I've been listening to the CA forestry fire spokesman all week on my radio whine about how hot and dry it is...as the fire he is charged with putting out rages on....

He should be replaced by someone today that can get the damn thing put out....we must manage forest land bury power lines and carve fire breaks into hills....in other words do something other than fight about it....
 
Check it out. The dirty little secret is that universities and groups that receive federal grants to come up with CO2 evidence for global warming will find whatever it takes to keep the grants coming. It's basic human nature and somebody needs to deal with it.
 
How are people not aware what we're going through right has been recorded thousands of times before man ever existed?

The earth is not static, it is chaotic in that it's always in motion, changing cycling, evolving.

In the 70s everyone knew for a facot nuclear energy was sending us into an ice age, now c02 is causing global warming.

The earth has had world wide floods, world wide fires, world wide droughts, world wide ice age, tectonic activity causing land masses to break apart, a total reversal of the poles, volcanic activity, complete loss and gain of the ozone, cosmic radiation, bombarded by meteors, and a whole lot more. And all of this was millions of years before man showed up.

So knowing all of that how do we not know whats going on right now is another cycle of the planet we know has happened many times before?
 
How are people not aware what we're going through right has been recorded thousands of times before man ever existed?
Wow! Have you told the scientists who discovered all of that? Do you think they are laboring under the ignorance of their own life's work? Duh
 
They've been caught numerous times
No "they" haven't. You don't know what you are talking about. As usual. The data for climate science stretches across every field of science and the entire scientific community. 100 scientists could try to fudge data, and it would have no effect on the body of science and evidence. But i know that is far too nuanced for ignorant, angry deniers.
 
No "they" haven't. You don't know what you are talking about. As usual. The data for climate science stretches across every field of science and the entire scientific community. 100 scientists could try to fudge data, and it would have no effect on the body of science and evidence. But i know that is far too nuanced for ignorant, angry deniers.

Yes they have, now run along before I embarass you
 
Yes they have, now run along before I embarass you
Wrong. You dont know what you are talking about. As usual. No, you have not outsmarted the entire global scientific community by doing a google search. No, you could not pass a basic quiz on anything regarding this topic. Just another American Idiot who lies to himself out loud as a coping mechanism.
 
Oh what the hell...


Now make the argument any of that has affected the body of science. It hasnt, so you might as well go diddle yourself.
 
Go away, you've been shellacked
Right, you, an uneducated slob, just outsmarted the global scientific community by posting two articles you never read, the second of which actually explained why your talking point is hot garbage. Sure dummy.
 
Last edited:
It is the sun, stupid.


The sun and not human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) may be the main cause of warmer temperatures in recent decades, according to a new study with findings that sharply contradict the conclusions of the United Nations (UN) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The peer-reviewed paper, produced by a team of almost two dozen scientists from around the world, concluded that previous studies did not adequately consider the role of solar energy in explaining increased temperatures.
The new study was released just as the UN released its sixth “Assessment Report,” known as AR6, that once again argued in favor of the view that man-kind’s emissions of CO2 were to blame for global warming. The report said human responsibility was “unequivocal.”
But the new study casts serious doubt on the hypothesis.
Calling the blaming of CO2 by the IPCC “premature,” the climate scientists and solar physicists argued in the new paper that the UN IPCC’s conclusions blaming human emissions were based on “narrow and incomplete data about the Sun’s total irradiance.”
Indeed, the global climate body appears to display deliberate and systemic bias in what views, studies, and data are included in its influential reports, multiple authors told The Epoch Times in a series of phone and video interviews.
“Depending on which published data and studies you use, you can show that all of the warming is caused by the sun, but the IPCC uses a different data set to come up with the opposite conclusion,” lead study author Ronan Connolly, Ph.D. told The Epoch Times in a video interview.
“In their insistence on forcing a so-called scientific consensus, the IPCC seems to have decided to consider only those data sets and studies that support their chosen narrative,” he added.
...


Yup.... Not a hard one to figure out.

Jo
 

Forum List

Back
Top