Evolution: The most worthless theory ever developed.

[keepitreal]

Oye vay, all cakes begin with eggs, butter, flour, sugar, baking powder
without these main, basic ingredients, you can not make a cake

what is added to the basic cake recipe,
determines what kind of cake you will end up with.

To use the same analogy ... a pineapple cake and a chocolate cake have many of the same ingredients in common (analogous to gene sequences in this example).

But all cake recipes are variations on an original recipe (the proto-cake). Variations in the ingredients (changes to the gene sequences) create different types of cakes. These variations however aren't introduced by errors in replications, but by chefs.

If cakes were self-replicating then replications errors in the recipes would lead to variations from the original proto-cake. Most of those mistakes would make no difference or lead to a bad cake. But, occasionally, it leads to chocolate cakes and ultimately to the pinnacle of cake evolution.

To use the same analogy ... a pineapple cake and a chocolate cake have many of the same ingredients in common (analogous to gene sequences in this example).

But all cake recipes are variations on an original recipe (the proto-cake). Variations in the ingredients (changes to the gene sequences) create different types of cakes. These variations however aren't introduced by errors in replications, but by chefs.

If cakes were self-replicating then replications errors in the recipes would lead to variations from the original proto-cake. Most of those mistakes would make no difference or lead to a bad cake. But, occasionally, it leads to chocolate cakes and ultimately to the pinnacle of cake evolution.

Whaaat?!

Defective produces defects, not new species.

To suggest that necessary genes and chromosomes
that are unique to the DNA blueprints of every cell structure
can be created by chance due to replication errors, is absurd!

Defects and deformities in the DNA profile
cause defects, deformities or mutations to the structure.
When cells divide, they are identical replications of the parent cell.
Cells cannot replicate cells that aren't present in their DNA structure
or create cells unique to a genome structure not of their own.

Building a house from the blueprints creates a house
deviating from the blueprint by putting the door on the roof
doesn't mean you'll end up with a mansion instead...
you'll end up with a fucked up house cuz the door is on the roof!

The genetic DNA cell structure for human beings
had to exist, in order for and before, it could be replicated.
Everything had to exist before it could replicate or reproduce.

God didn't have to take short cuts
with a work smarter, not harder mentality.
Nothing is too hard or complicated for God...
though I do find your spin interesting and original

 

[fncceo]

Nothing is too hard or complicated for God...

But he can't master molecular biology?

 

[S.J.]

There is the Plant and Animal Kingdom and both evolved from some kind of thing.

What "thing" would that be?

Some kind of alien life form that infested Earth which most likely arrived via comet from a foreign star system during the second meteor bombardment some 3.7 billion years ago.

Pretty wild guess there, but let's say (for the sake of argument) you're right. How did that "alien life form" come into existence?

 

[Old Rocks]

The theory of evolution has no value to anyone, or anything. In fact, there is not one single field of scientific study that would be impacted negatively if Darwin had never came up with his silly theory. Evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to scientific understanding.

LOL OK, we accept the fact that you are one ignorant ass. LOL

 

[Old Rocks]

If you believe that DNA exists, you know that every living organism on this planet has DNA in common with every other. That, in itself, is an elegant proof that evolution occurs and is wholly responsible for the origin and development of species.

That's like claiming proof of evolution based on the fact that all creatures need air to survive.

Not at all, you silly ignorant ass. All creatures do not need air to survive. Some do not even need oxygen. In fact, those look to be the oldest life on earth.

 

[Old Rocks]

There is the Plant and Animal Kingdom and both evolved from some kind of thing.

What "thing" would that be?

Some kind of alien life form that infested Earth which most likely arrived via comet from a foreign star system during the second meteor bombardment some 3.7 billion years ago.

Pretty wild guess there, but let's say (for the sake of argument) you're right. How did that "alien life form" come into existence?

What alien life form are you speaking of? Give us a link to the examination of an alien life form, and we will get back to you.

 

[Old Rocks]

The theory of evolution has no value to anyone, or anything. In fact, there is not one single field of scientific study that would be impacted negatively if Darwin had never came up with his silly theory. Evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to scientific understanding.

Lamarck or Darwin? That's a real problem. Most don't even know what it is.

Greg

LOL I don't know of anybody with credentials that is pushing Lamarkism now. Pretty well died out with the failure of Lysenko.

 

[Old Rocks]

The Big Book of Myths and Fables.

Or you could say History and metaphor. But even myths and fables can contain wisdom and good advice (and some truth).

A myth is not a fairy tale. It is an instructive story within a certain cultural context. Often when taken out of that context, it then becomes a fairy tale. And, sieved through several languages, and cultures, it is little wonder that the Bible for people incapable of reading it in the original Hebrew cannot understand what the original myth or metaphor was all about.

 

[gtopa1]

The theory of evolution has no value to anyone, or anything. In fact, there is not one single field of scientific study that would be impacted negatively if Darwin had never came up with his silly theory. Evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to scientific understanding.

Lamarck or Darwin? That's a real problem. Most don't even know what it is.

Greg

LOL I don't know of anybody with credentials that is pushing Lamarkism now. Pretty well died out with the failure of Lysenko.

I cheekily throw it in when discussing evolution with ordinary folk. Not the name but the mechanism. Very few pick it up as wrong.

Greg

 

[OldLady]

Threads like this belong in either the Rubber Room or Religion and Ethics. It's embarrassing to put it in Science and Technology. No science about it, unfortunately.

 

[Syriusly]

I'm sure you wouldn't be aware of advances brought about by the study of evolution with your small store of knowledge. Here is a small primer for dummies of how study of evolution helps us.
Relevance of evolution: medicine

You do realize that we are discussing Darwinian evolution, right? What you are describing is what is commonly referred to as adaptation. For instance, bacteria do not become immune to antibiotics. They actually lose the ability to ingest the antibiotics that used to be effective on them. This is not evolution. It is the loss of genetic information.

LOL- what you are speaking about is Creationist revisionism

What he posted about was evolution.

 

[RWNJ]

The far left does not really believe in Evolution, they are just told to believe it as to push the far left religious agendas. However they will show that they do not or have ever believe in it.

Which is why no one will be able to give me one example of how evolution has benefited anyone, or anything.

Man-made evolution has benefited everyone. Take for instance GMO grain and advances in medicine. Fuck Mars! Bill Maher

GMO grain? You mean that grain that leeches calcium from your body? That GMO grain?

GMO grain kills bugs that eat it but has no effect on humans. No pesticide needed and that is a boon for the environment.

Correction. They told you it has no effect on humans. And you believe them. You poor fool.

 

[RWNJ]

The theory of evolution has no value to anyone, or anything. In fact, there is not one single field of scientific study that would be impacted negatively if Darwin had never came up with his silly theory. Evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to scientific understanding.

LOL OK, we accept the fact that you are one ignorant ass. LOL

Coming from you, I'll take that as a compliment.

 

[ScienceRocks]

RWNJ, You're the most worthless sub-human piece of trash ever developed.

IS there any scientific theory that you don't see as worthless? You sound like Hamas or the isis preaching how evil western knowledge is and you sound like an enemy to the united states.

 

[Divine Wind]

The theory of evolution has no value to anyone, or anything. In fact, there is not one single field of scientific study that would be impacted negatively if Darwin had never came up with his silly theory. Evolution has contributed absolutely nothing to scientific understanding.

It fascinates me how the Republican party has shifted from the party of logic and sense to the party of religious ideology. It's true that the RNC is more like the DNC than the GOP.

 

[Divine Wind]

RWNJ, You're the most worthless sub-human piece of trash ever developed.

IS there any scientific theory that you don't see as worthless? You sound like Hamas or the isis preaching how evil western knowledge is and you sound like an enemy to the united states.

Hate like yours is what propagates more hate.

Yes, RWNJ is equally hateful, so please explain to me why you are any different than him.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The fossil record shows an ever so slow of progression from single-celled organisms (for 2.8 billion years there were only single-celled organisms on Earth), to multi-celled organisms (we see evidence of multi-celled organisms beginning somewhere around 1.2 billion years ago), to the Cambrian explosion (about 550 million years ago the diversity of life branched in many directions, with most of the forms that evolved to present today). To the diversity of life we see today.

You don't need 'an opinion' on this, we SEE it. There were no dinosaurs 600 million years ago, there weren't any plants or animals living on land that far back! No human fossils older than 6 million years. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not, it is physical evidence that does not require belief. We see the slow progression from tiny swimming organisms with no eyes, tail, or fins, but with a hint of bi-lateral symmetry or the very beginnings of a distinct left and right side to the organism. Before that only globs of cells relatively speaking. Later we see 'eye-spots' gradually evolve, over millions of years. Ever so slowly these changes took place. We also see fins develop and tails for swimming. Mouths go from just an opening that let's water pass through to filter out food to jaws and later teeth. All of this is in the fossil record in a progression from simple to complex.

Put aside this nonsense that because you 'believe' in a 'god', any 'god', therefore all this evidence is useless. Sorry your opinion is one based on an abyss of ignorance and a disdain for those who have knowledge. True knowledge.