Eric Holder: Palin Wasn't a Good VP Candidate, Even Worse Judge of Who Should Be Impe

LMAO A program the Bush adminisration never put into play. They decided it was to dangerous.

Holder, however, decided to run with it. Last I checked Holder works for that fuck in the WH. Oh yeah. His names Obama.

That is, of course, a lie:

ATF gunwalking scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Wide Receiver was up and running in 2006.

And your point is nonsense.

Operation Wide Receiver may have been up and running in 2006 or it may not, but Obama took office 3 years later and decides to start his own version of it, and Fast & Furious was Obama doubling down on a program that was cancelled because it didn't work.

This of course gives Obama an excuse when he should have none. Some people use lessons learned to shape their future decisions and attempt not to make the same mistake again. Instead Obama makes even worse mistakes. But because he patterned it after a Republicans' program, everything's cool.

What rational person actually believes this sort of rubbish?

I tend to believe that Obama is working in concert with Mexican and Central American drug cartels. This flood of illegals wouldn't even be possible without some sort of cooperation between the cartels, the Mexican government, and the White House.


Muddy, you have gone off the fucking deep end on that one. Obama working with the drug cartels eh?

To almost quote YOU Muddy; Q. what rational person actually believes this sort of fucking stupid bull shit? A. The Muddy does.

You crazy dude.
 
That is, of course, a lie:

ATF gunwalking scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Wide Receiver was up and running in 2006.

And your point is nonsense.

Operation Wide Receiver may have been up and running in 2006 or it may not, but Obama took office 3 years later and decides to start his own version of it, and Fast & Furious was Obama doubling down on a program that was cancelled because it didn't work.

This of course gives Obama an excuse when he should have none. Some people use lessons learned to shape their future decisions and attempt not to make the same mistake again. Instead Obama makes even worse mistakes. But because he patterned it after a Republicans' program, everything's cool.

What rational person actually believes this sort of rubbish?

I tend to believe that Obama is working in concert with Mexican and Central American drug cartels. This flood of illegals wouldn't even be possible without some sort of cooperation between the cartels, the Mexican government, and the White House.


Muddy, you have gone off the fucking deep end on that one. Obama working with the drug cartels eh?

To almost quote YOU Muddy; Q. what rational person actually believes this sort of fucking stupid bull shit? A. The Muddy does.

You crazy dude.

Why does the left feel so certain that a human they elected would not do inhumane things? History does and will repeat itself, but the left is so certain that the signs, although disturbing, are irrelevant.

Obama is just not that kind of guy

I'm afraid he is and has completely gone off the reservation

-Geaux
 
That is, of course, a lie:

ATF gunwalking scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Wide Receiver was up and running in 2006.

And your point is nonsense.

Operation Wide Receiver may have been up and running in 2006 or it may not, but Obama took office 3 years later and decides to start his own version of it, and Fast & Furious was Obama doubling down on a program that was cancelled because it didn't work.

This of course gives Obama an excuse when he should have none. Some people use lessons learned to shape their future decisions and attempt not to make the same mistake again. Instead Obama makes even worse mistakes. But because he patterned it after a Republicans' program, everything's cool.

What rational person actually believes this sort of rubbish?

I tend to believe that Obama is working in concert with Mexican and Central American drug cartels. This flood of illegals wouldn't even be possible without some sort of cooperation between the cartels, the Mexican government, and the White House.


Muddy, you have gone off the fucking deep end on that one. Obama working with the drug cartels eh?

To almost quote YOU Muddy; Q. what rational person actually believes this sort of fucking stupid bull shit? A. The Muddy does.

You crazy dude.

The only alternative to this is he's a absolute retard and can't stop fucking up. Do you want to admit he's a dangerously incompetent asshole or will you admit that this was all planned?

I tend to believe his careless attitude about this crisis is indicative of prior knowledge, especially since there is evidence to support that they prepared for this in January, even advertized for transportation for the "refugees" with private companies.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportu...12fbc917a46d6709d38bd&tab=core&tabmode=list&=

ScreenSnapz0082-620x591.jpg
 
Last edited:
And your point is nonsense.

Operation Wide Receiver may have been up and running in 2006 or it may not, but Obama took office 3 years later and decides to start his own version of it, and Fast & Furious was Obama doubling down on a program that was cancelled because it didn't work.

This of course gives Obama an excuse when he should have none. Some people use lessons learned to shape their future decisions and attempt not to make the same mistake again. Instead Obama makes even worse mistakes. But because he patterned it after a Republicans' program, everything's cool.

What rational person actually believes this sort of rubbish?

I tend to believe that Obama is working in concert with Mexican and Central American drug cartels. This flood of illegals wouldn't even be possible without some sort of cooperation between the cartels, the Mexican government, and the White House.


Muddy, you have gone off the fucking deep end on that one. Obama working with the drug cartels eh?

To almost quote YOU Muddy; Q. what rational person actually believes this sort of fucking stupid bull shit? A. The Muddy does.

You crazy dude.

Why does the left feel so certain that a human they elected would not do inhumane things? History does and will repeat itself, but the left is so certain that the signs, although disturbing, are irrelevant.

Obama is just not that kind of guy

I'm afraid he is and has completely gone off the reservation

-Geaux


Dude, you are as crazy (if not crazier) than the Muddy is. Quite the company that you keep.

You can believe what ever you want. This is America you know. You can believe that the moon is made of green cheese. You can believe that the ultra rich would never in their lives want to control more and more wealth and the running of the world. (you know, like history shows others wanting to rule the world.) Read up on those that thought they could rule the world. Very interesting.

But to believe that Obama has ties to the drug cartels in Central America and is working with them to bring in more.........whatever the drug cartels bring in.......that's pretty fucking insane. Even for you.

But if you've got PROOF of your beliefs, I sure would like to read it. If no proof, you have fun with the Muccy. You all deserve each other.
 
And your point is nonsense.

Operation Wide Receiver may have been up and running in 2006 or it may not, but Obama took office 3 years later and decides to start his own version of it, and Fast & Furious was Obama doubling down on a program that was cancelled because it didn't work.

This of course gives Obama an excuse when he should have none. Some people use lessons learned to shape their future decisions and attempt not to make the same mistake again. Instead Obama makes even worse mistakes. But because he patterned it after a Republicans' program, everything's cool.

What rational person actually believes this sort of rubbish?

I tend to believe that Obama is working in concert with Mexican and Central American drug cartels. This flood of illegals wouldn't even be possible without some sort of cooperation between the cartels, the Mexican government, and the White House.


Muddy, you have gone off the fucking deep end on that one. Obama working with the drug cartels eh?

To almost quote YOU Muddy; Q. what rational person actually believes this sort of fucking stupid bull shit? A. The Muddy does.

You crazy dude.

The only alternative to this is he's a absolute retard and can't stop fucking up. Do you want to admit he's a dangerously incompetent asshole or will you admit that this was all planned?

I tend to believe his careless attitude about this crisis is indicative of prior knowledge, especially since there is evidence to support that they prepared for this in January, even advertized for transportation for the "refugees" with private companies.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportu...12fbc917a46d6709d38bd&tab=core&tabmode=list&=


Here is what I will admit Muddy.

I will admit that you and people like you have "Obama Derangement Syndrome" Will you admit that?

I will admit that the Republican bounce from subject to subject trying to pin anything and everything on Obama. This is part of the ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome)

I will admit the the fucking politicians in our wonderful Congress, led by the incompetent Repubs will not put forward and pass a decent immigration bill.

On immigration Muddy. How come the Congress won't go after the employers that employ the illegal immigrants? How come Muddy. Is it because the Chamber of Commerce thinks that would be a bad idea for their members? You tell me Muddy.

And I will admit that Obama made a terrible awful mistake almost immediately after he was elected. That mistake was to try and engage the Republicans in efforts and legislation that would help ALL Americans. He should of told all you Republicans to fuck off, (in a nice Presidential way).

I admit and probably Obama would admit that trying to work with Repubs was and is a mistake.

Other than that. I admit I gotta get ready for work.
 
Hey Muddy, how do you know that the advertisement isn't to escort kids back to their home country?
I didn't see anywhere which direction the escort was to be headed in.

Where is that info?
 
[MENTION=35352]zeke[/MENTION]

That is why I don't engage w/certain members on here.

It's just one RIDICULOUS claim after the other with many of these USMB far RWers.

Muddy is foremost of that group.
 
Holder should be arrested for his awful 'Fast & Furious' atrocity. He's a criminal traitor, just like his boss. So i'm not interested in what he thinks of others. He should already be wearing an orange jumpsuit.
 
LOL, from the guy who likes the Boob from Delaware who gave up being the biggest ass in the Senate to living in the Naval Observatory.

I'm not a big fan of Palin except the fortitude she shows in the endless misogynistic rantings of the left she constantly gets spewed at her and the grace she handles it.

You do not support women's rights until you support them regardless of whether they agree with you. What you support is contempt to women, succumb or be crushed.

I realize that you fake Libertarians prefer fantasy to reality, but I am neither Bill Kristol or Anna Navarro.

And you don't agree with Bill Beckel, and you have no idea how exactly...
Yes, I realize the only trick in your bag is to deflect.

You're dismissed until you can come up with a new trick.
 
Actually, I looked long and hard at John McCain in 2008 and came to the conclusion that he was a decent man, a bad candidate and would have been an absolutely horrific president.

You didn't look long and hard, then.

I have to agree. McCain would have been a pretty good president. He'd have had the ability to work with both sides, he wouldn't have been beholden to the various levels of crazy in his party, which never liked him.

Sadly, after years of Democrats saying, "We could almost stand Republicans if they were like John McCain", the time the GOP had a temporary bout of sanity and nominated him, the left passed.

My comment was on whether he's a 'decent man'. He is not. He is a petty, revenge-minded, small man who uses his power to exact that revenge. His pettiness is ongoing, due to his butthurt over losing to Obama.

And Democrats may have said that back when he was the self-described 'maverick', in 2000. But after getting fully on board with Bush and abandoning everything that made him a maverick, Democrats stopped saying that.

And he would have been a terrible president. We would still be ass-deep in Iraq, along with who knows where else.

He has neither the temperament or the diplomatic skills to be President.
 
You didn't look long and hard, then.

I have to agree. McCain would have been a pretty good president. He'd have had the ability to work with both sides, he wouldn't have been beholden to the various levels of crazy in his party, which never liked him.

Sadly, after years of Democrats saying, "We could almost stand Republicans if they were like John McCain", the time the GOP had a temporary bout of sanity and nominated him, the left passed.



Fuck the democrats. Who gives a shit about them. After November, the republicans can begin treating these pieces of trash they they deserve to be treated - roughly.

It will be nice to watch :D
Yet, you whine like a little bitch about perceived Democratic slights toward Republicans. :lol:
 
I realize that you fake Libertarians prefer fantasy to reality, but I am neither Bill Kristol or Anna Navarro.

And you don't agree with Bill Beckel, and you have no idea how exactly...
Yes, I realize the only trick in your bag is to deflect.

You're dismissed until you can come up with a new trick.

You said I am mixing liberal and Democrat as if they are the same. I said they are the same. You said they are not. I asked how they are not, be specific. You can't answer the question.

And "I" am deflecting?

LOL, come back when you grow hair on your balls, pee wee.
 
And you don't agree with Bill Beckel, and you have no idea how exactly...
Yes, I realize the only trick in your bag is to deflect.

You're dismissed until you can come up with a new trick.

You said I am mixing liberal and Democrat as if they are the same. I said they are the same. You said they are not. I asked how they are not, be specific. You can't answer the question.

And "I" am deflecting?

LOL, come back when you grow hair on your balls, pee wee.

Where did you ask that?
 
I didn't expect to see anything different from the left

they take lessons from these hateful people in this administration and the Democrat party

You talk about hate from the left a lot. The hate for Obama from the right started before the inauguration.

Hate?

No.

Distrust?

Yes.

First he lied about public financing.
Then he lied about McCains position on amnesty
Then he lied about his relationship with a domestic terrorist.
Then he lied about his knowledge of Reverend Wrights sentiments on America.
Then he used the phrase "spread around the wealth" which would concern ANY conservative.

Whe people were against Bush policies.......they were against Bush's policies.

When people are against Obama policies it is because they are hateful racists.

Please...continue to carry on that narrative. Play a role in dividing the country.
 
Actually, I looked long and hard at John McCain in 2008 and came to the conclusion that he was a decent man, a bad candidate and would have been an absolutely horrific president.

You didn't look long and hard, then.

I have to agree. McCain would have been a pretty good president. He'd have had the ability to work with both sides, he wouldn't have been beholden to the various levels of crazy in his party, which never liked him.

Sadly, after years of Democrats saying, "We could almost stand Republicans if they were like John McCain", the time the GOP had a temporary bout of sanity and nominated him, the left passed.

If you were talking about McCain 2000, I would have agreed with you 100%

But McCain 2008 was a far cry from McCain 2000. The eight years of far-right butt-kissing that was required before the GOP would nominate him ruined him.

If John McCain 2000 ran into John McCain 2008 on the street, he'd kick his ass out of general principles.
 
I didn't expect to see anything different from the left

they take lessons from these hateful people in this administration and the Democrat party

You talk about hate from the left a lot. The hate for Obama from the right started before the inauguration.

Hate?

No.

Distrust?

Yes.

First he lied about public financing.
Then he lied about McCains position on amnesty
Then he lied about his relationship with a domestic terrorist.
Then he lied about his knowledge of Reverend Wrights sentiments on America.
Then he used the phrase "spread around the wealth" which would concern ANY conservative.

Whe people were against Bush policies.......they were against Bush's policies.

When people are against Obama policies it is because they are hateful racists.

Please...continue to carry on that narrative. Play a role in dividing the country.

speak for yourself
 
I didn't expect to see anything different from the left

they take lessons from these hateful people in this administration and the Democrat party

You talk about hate from the left a lot. The hate for Obama from the right started before the inauguration.

Hate?

No.

Distrust?

Yes.

First he lied about public financing.
Then he lied about McCains position on amnesty
Then he lied about his relationship with a domestic terrorist.
Then he lied about his knowledge of Reverend Wrights sentiments on America.
Then he used the phrase "spread around the wealth" which would concern ANY conservative.

Whe people were against Bush policies.......they were against Bush's policies.

When people are against Obama policies it is because they are hateful racists.

Please...continue to carry on that narrative. Play a role in dividing the country.
You should look up the definition of 'lie'.
 
You talk about hate from the left a lot. The hate for Obama from the right started before the inauguration.

Hate?

No.

Distrust?

Yes.

First he lied about public financing.
Then he lied about McCains position on amnesty
Then he lied about his relationship with a domestic terrorist.
Then he lied about his knowledge of Reverend Wrights sentiments on America.
Then he used the phrase "spread around the wealth" which would concern ANY conservative.

Whe people were against Bush policies.......they were against Bush's policies.

When people are against Obama policies it is because they are hateful racists.

Please...continue to carry on that narrative. Play a role in dividing the country.

speak for yourself

You tell me to speak for myself as I characterize the thinking of those that think similarly to me.....

While you speak for others who think differently than you.

Quite ironic.

Have a great day GT.
 
You talk about hate from the left a lot. The hate for Obama from the right started before the inauguration.

Hate?

No.

Distrust?

Yes.

First he lied about public financing.
Then he lied about McCains position on amnesty
Then he lied about his relationship with a domestic terrorist.
Then he lied about his knowledge of Reverend Wrights sentiments on America.
Then he used the phrase "spread around the wealth" which would concern ANY conservative.

Whe people were against Bush policies.......they were against Bush's policies.

When people are against Obama policies it is because they are hateful racists.

Please...continue to carry on that narrative. Play a role in dividing the country.
You should look up the definition of 'lie'.

Oh. OK.

Thanks.
 

Forum List

Back
Top