Easy way to eliminate same-sex marriage "equality" and affirm superiority of strait marriage

[Unification]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

 

[Faun]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

You’re stuck with Obergefell. Deal with it.

 

[Syriusly]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Why not just pass a law requiring married couples to have children under penalty of law?

Right after you pass the law that calls for the stoning to death of gays.

 

[deanrd]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Funny Republicans also want to assert the superiority of the white race.
The problem is Republicans are the least superior people on the planet.

 

[deanrd]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Why not just pass a law requiring married couples to have children under penalty of law?

Right after you pass the law that calls for the stoning to death of gays.

Things Republicans want desperately

 

[bodecea]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Go for it.......

 

[Slade3200]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Your idocracy is screaming in that OP. So it’s the sodmite marriages that you object to huh? That means heterosexual marriages and lesbian marriages are cool. Right? What about the wives that like to take it up the butt? Shall we do rectal exams before each ceremony?

Thanks for the laugh.

 

[g5000]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

So you want government intervention in our private lives. What's more, you want government gifts for not being gay! You realize this means you are not a conservative, right? You are a leech.

And you can't even spell straight correctly.

 

[Faun]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

So you want government intervention in our private lives. What's more, you want government gifts for not being gay! You realize this means you are not a conservative, right? You are a leech.

And you can't even spell straight correctly.

I’m sure he can spell sock.

 

[g5000]

The whole reason "gay marriage" is even an issue is because of government gifts. If the government was not involved in our marriages, then it wouldn't matter which adult you married. It would be between you and your church or whatever.

But pseudocons want to have all these government cash and prizes for their marriages, and don't want anyone else to have the equal protection of those laws which bestow those government cash and prizes on them.

 

[Ringel05]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

 

[jwoodie]

Why not just pass a law requiring married couples to have children under penalty of law?

Actually, you might be on to something. The negative effects of divorce on children has been swept under the rug for decades. Why not have easily dissolved civil unions available to everyone, but much more binding marriage contracts available only to couples with children?

 

[TNHarley]

This dude is a troll guys, come on

 

[Unification]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Your idocracy is screaming in that OP. So it’s the sodmite marriages that you object to huh? That means heterosexual marriages and lesbian marriages are cool. Right? What about the wives that like to take it up the butt? Shall we do rectal exams before each ceremony?

Thanks for the laugh.

Nay, lesbian marriage is not legitimate, may be less harmful than sodomy since it not involve acts related to human dung and spread associated diseases, but lesbian is usually result of woman being in relationship with abusive cad, and developing phobia of men so she need woman for companionship.

Likely if there was way of getting modern males to "man" up and stop being such cads and dogs, we could eliminate the problem of lesbians, since they would get to experience real man.

 

[Slade3200]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Your idocracy is screaming in that OP. So it’s the sodmite marriages that you object to huh? That means heterosexual marriages and lesbian marriages are cool. Right? What about the wives that like to take it up the butt? Shall we do rectal exams before each ceremony?

Thanks for the laugh.

Nay, lesbian marriage is not legitimate, may be less harmful than sodomy since it not involve acts related to human dung and spread associated diseases, but lesbian is usually result of woman being in relationship with abusive cad, and developing phobia of men so she need woman for companionship.

Likely if there was way of getting modern males to "man" up and stop being such cads and dogs, we could eliminate the problem of lesbians, since they would get to experience real man.

Youre the last person who should be explaining how lesbians think... what in the world makes you think you’re qualified to do that?! Regardless, there are still lesbian marriages and your idiotic OP seems to qualify those marriges as legit. Oops, didn’t really think that one through did ya?

 

[Unification]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

So you want government intervention in our private lives. What's more, you want government gifts for not being gay! You realize this means you are not a conservative, right? You are a leech.

And you can't even spell straight correctly.

Nay, job of governments is to legislate national and statewide morality of Judeo-Christian variety on people, this is proper role of all governments. Only people who are moral and answer to higher power have autonomy and authority to self-govern without oversight of moral rulers, not immoral and materialistic individuals who embrace degeneracy and evils.

State should not be theocratic necessarily, as in ruled by the Priestly class directly, but should be quasi-theocratic and have sole purpose of legislating morality and punishing degeneracy that we see in modern Rome.

Regulation of moral degeneracy is allowed under common law, such as how state obscenity laws could be used to ban pornography if they were enforced, or how states have authority to govern behavior of adults regardless of "consent" if it for the greater good of the moral and virtuous - but sadly many laws not enforced as they should be more strictly.

 

[bodecea]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

So you want government intervention in our private lives. What's more, you want government gifts for not being gay! You realize this means you are not a conservative, right? You are a leech.

And you can't even spell straight correctly.

Nay, job of governments is to legislate national and statewide morality of Judeo-Christian variety on people, this is proper role of all governments. Only people who are moral and answer to higher power have autonomy and authority to self-govern without oversight of moral rulers, not immoral and materialistic individuals who embrace degeneracy and evils.

State should not be theocratic necessarily, as in ruled by the Priestly class directly, but should be quasi-theocratic and have sole purpose of legislating morality and punishing degeneracy that we see in modern Rome.

Regulation of moral degeneracy is allowed under common law, such as how state obscenity laws could be used to ban pornography if they were enforced, or how states have authority to govern behavior of adults regardless of "consent" if it for the greater good of the moral and virtuous - but sadly many laws not enforced as they should be more strictly.

"job of government is to legislate national and statewide morality of Judeo-Christian variety on people"....I have my copy of the U.S. Constitution handy.....point out where it says that in either the Articles or Amendments.

 

[Unification]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Your idocracy is screaming in that OP. So it’s the sodmite marriages that you object to huh? That means heterosexual marriages and lesbian marriages are cool. Right? What about the wives that like to take it up the butt? Shall we do rectal exams before each ceremony?

Thanks for the laugh.

Nay, lesbian marriage is not legitimate, may be less harmful than sodomy since it not involve acts related to human dung and spread associated diseases, but lesbian is usually result of woman being in relationship with abusive cad, and developing phobia of men so she need woman for companionship.

Likely if there was way of getting modern males to "man" up and stop being such cads and dogs, we could eliminate the problem of lesbians, since they would get to experience real man.

Youre the last person who should be explaining how lesbians think... what in the world makes you think you’re qualified to do that?! Regardless, there are still lesbian marriages and your idiotic OP seems to qualify those marriges as legit. Oops, didn’t really think that one through did ya?

This why state should create superior version of marriage only for natural and straight couples, and promote it as superior to degenerate variety of "marriage" open to those of lesser persuasion such as sodomy, lesbianism, and other disorders of the mind and nature.

 

[Slade3200]

Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.

Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.

If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.

Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.

So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he

Your idocracy is screaming in that OP. So it’s the sodmite marriages that you object to huh? That means heterosexual marriages and lesbian marriages are cool. Right? What about the wives that like to take it up the butt? Shall we do rectal exams before each ceremony?

Thanks for the laugh.

Nay, lesbian marriage is not legitimate, may be less harmful than sodomy since it not involve acts related to human dung and spread associated diseases, but lesbian is usually result of woman being in relationship with abusive cad, and developing phobia of men so she need woman for companionship.

Likely if there was way of getting modern males to "man" up and stop being such cads and dogs, we could eliminate the problem of lesbians, since they would get to experience real man.

Youre the last person who should be explaining how lesbians think... what in the world makes you think you’re qualified to do that?! Regardless, there are still lesbian marriages and your idiotic OP seems to qualify those marriges as legit. Oops, didn’t really think that one through did ya?

This why state should create superior version of marriage only for natural and straight couples, and promote it as superior to degenerate variety of "marriage" open to those of lesser persuasion such as sodomy, lesbianism, and other disorders of the mind and nature.

You go ahead and keep promoting that. haha

I can tell you right now people are just gonna laugh at you. Good luck on your mission

 

[Siete]

This dude is a troll guys, come on

https://data.whicdn.com/images/144383474/original.gif


look, not a dead monkey !