Earth just had its Second-Warmest March on Record

[BackAgain]

I post in my own words and with Links as wll.

You post other people’s opinions without comprehending the “science” in the slightest. It is reflected in your numerous bloviating posts.

The best quality ones possible/extant to back my opinions, and yes that formed them.

They say what you’ve been told to believe so you accept them without comprehending them.

Now go check the Propane tank before it blows up your $12 worth of belongings.

Your use of the fallacy of ad hominem is neither witty nor persuasive, but it does underscore your reliance on stereotypes.

PS: since your Outdated 2009 Article in which he mentions some short pauses, but just about every year since then has been Hotter or Hottest. I wonder what he says/flubs Now?

It isn’t outdated merely because it is not recent, you dope. And your claim about every year since isn’t true in its own right nor does it undercut the point he made.

`

PS2:

Favourite climate myths by William Happer​

Below are many of the climate myths used by William Happer plus how often each myth has been used.

Climate misinformation by source: William Happer

Examines the science and arguments of global warming skepticism. Common objections like 'global warming is caused by the sun', 'temperature has changed naturally in the past' or 'other planets are warming too' are examined to see what the science really says.

skepticalscience.com

`
`

Your ignorant reliance on one article is yet another example of how generally ignorant and how easily misled you are.

;


;

 

[abu afak]

Wtf are you babbling about this time? You post links to the words of others because you don’t know the difference between their words and the words of other scientists who dispute those claims. You’re mouthing what others have said is hardly support.

You laughingly dismissed my reference to the Congressional testimony of a Princeton physicist. The use of the emoticon isn’t an argument. And I get that. You can’t argue.

My points are plainly put. Scientists do disagree. “Consensus” has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific method.

DUH! You don't get 'Consensus' until a few decades of Thousands of Scientists using the scientific method have presented their Evidence you Stupid Monkey/little Thug.

Atmospheric water vapor and CO2 have some acknowledged ability to influence the Earth’s average temperature. But the contribution of the fairly small trace gas, CO2, has not been scientifically and validly shown to contribute to planetary atmospheric or ocean higher temperatures to the extent you alarmists claim.

Also, something else you won’t get or maybe won’t even read:

Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Prof. Declares

Another Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – Top Prof. Declares: ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Emeritus Professor Chemi…

www.climatedepot.com

Well I buried your last denier Clown and shoved him right back up your Butt Hole with FACTS.
Next up!
This one's theory I already destroyed several times last month.

​

Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming​

​

MYTH: Water vapor is the most important, abundant greenhouse gas. So if we’re going to control a greenhouse gas, why don’t we control it instead of carbon dioxide (CO2)?​

​

This is a common Misconception in the debate over greenhouse gases and the causes of global warming. Both water vapor and carbon dioxide are important greenhouse gases that play a crucial role in atmospheric warming. A greenhouse gas is a gas that absorbs and re-emits infrared radiation in Earth’s atmosphere, thereby increasing temperatures. Which gas then is to blame for global warming and should be controlled?​

​

Water vapor accounts for 60-70% of the greenhouse effect while CO2 accounts for 25% —a notable difference when numbers alone are compared. It would seem then that water vapor should be climatologists’ primary focus. However, water vapor cannot be controlled by human intervention; it is simply a Product of its environment.​

​

The amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold is dependent on temperature. Under normal conditions, most of the heat emitted from Earth’s surface in the form of long wave radiation goes into the atmosphere and out into space. However, the presence of increased greenhouse gases traps more long-wave radiation, which means there is more energy in the atmosphere to warm the Earth’s surface.​

​

As the atmospheric temperature rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage, such as that found in our rivers, oceans, soils, and reservoirs. The released water vapor becomes a greenhouse gas where it then absorbs more energy radiated from the Earth and thus warms the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere results in further water evaporation and the cycle continues. This mechanism is known as a Positive Feedback Loop.​

​

Scientists then need to focus on what is Causing air temperatures to rise in the first place. Heat from Other Greenhouse Gases is Causing atmospheric Warming, Leading to an increase in water evaporation and compounding the greenhouse effect. Anthropogenic, or human-derived, CO2 serves as the Primary source of Warming with water vapor playing a Secondary role.​

While CO2 occurs naturally in the atmosphere, human interference has interrupted the carbon cycle through activities, such as burning forests, mining, and burning coal. These activities artificially release more carbon from their solid storage to its gaseous state in the lower atmosphere. The rapid increase in CO2 volume has exceeded the amount oceans and vegetation are able to re-absorb. Furthermore, as deforestation continues around the world, there is less vegetation every year available to sequester the carbon. Thus, excess CO2 remains in the atmosphere where it traps heat and stimulates water evaporation."...."​

​

Water Vapor, CO2, and Global Warming | IEDRO​

You are amateur cvm-drinking Trailer Park Trash scraping Google for Old denier Blog articles because YOU personally, UNLIKE ME, are NOT Conversant on the topic.

I should be charging you for the edu you Foul little Trash bucket.
Emptily/gratuitously Last-word away!
(like jc456 and TrollsterParrot)
`

 

[jc456]

Really?
And you feel quite comfortable just claiming that with Zero Documentation.
Is that more stupid or Dishonest?
Typical here on UCMonkeyBoard... Low IQ A$$%hole central

World reports fourth-warmest April since records began in 1950​

Copernicus Climate Change Service says Spain and Portugal recorded new high temperatures for that month​

World reports fourth-warmest April since records began in 1950

Copernicus Climate Change Service says Spain and Portugal recorded new high temperatures for that month

www.thenationalnews.com

`

From your link

Monday, covers April and despite some areas experiencing record highs, it also noted colder-than-average temperatures in a band stretching from the UK to south-east Europe.

It said temperatures for the month were much warmer than average in parts of Africa, part of Central Asia surrounding the Caspian Sea, in South-east Asia, Japan and Canada.

In contrast, it was colder than average in Alaska, Mongolia, the Arabian Gulf, India and Australia.

Hahaha hahaha

 

[BackAgain]

You don't get 'Consensus' until a few decades of Thiousands of Scientists using the scientific method have present their Evidenee you Stupid Monkey/little Thug;

Aside from your lack of a grasp on spelling and editing and grammar, you also conveniently miss the point.

“Consensus” has exactly and precisely not one fucking thing to do with the scientific method.

Well I burried yoy last denier Clown and shoved him right back yup your Butt Hole with FACTS

You’ve never done anything even remotely akin to your dishonest claim.

Next up!
This one's theory I already destroyed several times lst month.

You don’t even grasp and the basics much less the overall argument. So you aren’t able to “destroy” any of this in anything you post. Ever.

;


(

 

[Calypso Jones]

That's quite a claim seeing as the Global warming exspirts claim the earth is what now?? 4 billion years old?? second warmest march? wow? science. LOLOLOL

 

[Crick]

That's quite a claim seeing as the Global warming exspirts claim the earth is what now?? 4 billion years old?? second warmest march? wow? science. LOLOLOL

Did you fail to note the term "on record" or do you simply not understand what that means?

 

[Calypso Jones]

Did you fail to note the term "on record" or do you simply not understand what that means?

How far back does that 'on record' go? The globalists are full of shit and you guys buy it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Aside from your lack of a grasp on spelling and editing and grammar, you also conveniently miss the point.

“Consensus” has exactly and precisely not one fucking thing to do with the scientific method.

You’ve never done anything even remotely akin to your dishonest claim.

You don’t even grasp and the basics much less the overall argument. So you aren’t able to “destroy” any of this in anything you post. Ever.

;


(

When she's frothing, her accuarcy suffers.

 

[fncceo]

Earth just had its Second-Warmest March on Record​

 

[Calypso Jones]

These are cyclical, children. or should i say chicken littles?

 

[Calypso Jones]

174 year record. Why wouldn't you say that...it was right there in the article. 174 years...as opposed to the global warming and envirowhackjobs estimation of millions/billions of years of earth existence?? Why ...that is nothing but a blip on the screen of infinity isn't it?

I"M SURE there have been warmer marches and then many colder ones. Don't worry your silly little head.

Now this guy has been around since the beginning and he has this to say....

As long as the earth remains, there will be planting and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night.” Genesis 8:22

actually this warm winter meant that many people slated for starvation and freezing by the biden administration's poor plan on fossil (eternal) fuels made it through the winter alive and well....maybe a little thinner and poorer, but ALIVE.

 

[themirrorthief]

View attachment 783598

a new firm has done research that proves most global warming is due to the hot air coming out of democrats backside

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It continues even as the deniers tell us "their backyard had snow that day."
A an overall warm winter.
I'll keep you updated.
NOAA

Earth just had its second-warmest March on record​

Polar sea ice coverage for March 2023 ranked second smallest recorded​

April 13, 2023

​

The planet continued its exceptionally warm start to the year with its second-warmest March on record.
Global sea ice coverage also felt the heat, with sea ice running at its second-smallest extent since records began in 1979, according to scientists from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information.

Below are more highlights from NOAA’s latest monthly global climate report:

Climate by the numbers​

March 2023​

The average global land and ocean-surface temperature for March was 2.23 degrees F (1.24 degrees C) above the 20th-century average of 54.9 degrees (12.7 degrees C), ranking as the second-warmest March in the 174-year global climate record, behind March 2016.

March 2023 also was the 47th-consecutive March and the 529th-consecutive month with temperatures above the 20th-century average."..."

​

Earth just had its second-warmest March on record

Polar sea ice coverage for March 2023 ranked second smallest recorded

www.noaa.gov

`​

With the notable exception that we don't actually have accurate 20th Century land and ocean averages that far back AND the Cult adjusted he baseline to smooth out the warm spike in the 40's, the average global land and ocean-surface temperature for March was 2.23 degrees F (1.24 degrees C) above the 20th-century average of 54.9 degrees ...

There, fixed

 

[Crick]

How far back does that 'on record' go? The globalists are full of shit and you guys buy it.

Instrumented data goes back roughly till 1850. Proxy data goes back a few thousand years

How far back does that 'on record' go? The globalists are full of shit and you guys buy it.

What makes you think this information has anything to do with globalism? Whenever deniers are presented with a new study showing the world is warming and/or human GHG emissions are responsible, the creativity exposed is ASTOUNDING.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Instrumented data goes back roughly till 1850. Proxy data goes back a few thousand years

What makes you think this information has anything to do with globalism? Whenever deniers are presented with a new study showing the world is warming and/or human GHG emissions are responsible, the creativity exposed is ASTOUNDING.

Instrumented data goes back roughly till 1850. Proxy data goes back a few thousand years

What was the warmest March in the 1st Century?

 

[BackAgain]

a new firm has done research that proves most global warming is due to the hot air coming out of democrats backside

Worse than cow farts!

But do they ever propose banning Democraps? Noooooo.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Climate Change: A Fairy-Tale Wrapped In Falsehoods Inside Fictions - Liberty Sentinel

By Chris Wright, 5/8/23 The phony climate change narrative has had a rough time on Capitol Hill, lately. David Turk, deputy secretary of the Energy Department, made a complete fool of himself in congressional testimony when he would not say how much it would cost to achieve carbon neutrality by...

libertysentinel.org

 

[Crick]

Climate Change: A Fairy-Tale Wrapped In Falsehoods Inside Fictions - Liberty Sentinel

By Chris Wright, 5/8/23 The phony climate change narrative has had a rough time on Capitol Hill, lately. David Turk, deputy secretary of the Energy Department, made a complete fool of himself in congressional testimony when he would not say how much it would cost to achieve carbon neutrality by...

libertysentinel.org

The Liberty Sentinel. That's where I'd go to get the best science...

 

[EMH]

It's accurate relative to the time period.

So you know what data and what methods were used for that chart???

Hardly.

You see a chart. You parrot a chart. Not a good idea with taxpayer funded fudgebaking liars making the chart...

 

[Crick]

So you know what data and what methods were used for that chart???

Hardly.

You see a chart. You parrot a chart. Not a good idea with taxpayer funded fudgebaking liars making the chart...

Do YOU know what methods and data were used for that chart? Do YOU know what methods and data were used for the charts... ohh, never mind, you've never posted one.

Laurentide Ice Sheet | Definition, Timeline & Weakening | Study.com

Learn about the Laurentide Ice Sheet in North America and the definition of ice sheets. Learn about the size, condition, and weakening of the...

study.com

The retreat chronology of the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the last 10,000 years and implications for deglacial sea-level rise

Much of the world's population is located along the coasts. In a world of changing climate, the rate of sea level rise will determine the ability of these communities to adapt to sea level rise. Perhaps the ...

serc.carleton.edu

A glacial isostatic adjustment model for the central and northern Laurentide Ice Sheet based on relative sea level and GPS measurements

Abstract. The thickness and equivalent global sea level contribution of an improved model of the central and northern Laurentide Ice Sheet is constrained by 24

academic.oup.com

Laurentide Ice Sheet - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Laurentide Ice Sheet

'Laurentide Ice Sheet' published in 'Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers'

link.springer.com

Or is this also all "FUDGE"?