The first article echoed her sentiments and accurately portrayed Crazy Donald's softening on immigration reform -- which he now says there will be none.Of course it does. You're delusional to think otherwise. Your criticism of the link I posted was that it didn't quote Coulter, as though that invalidated the content of the link. So I gave you her own words in a second link, corroborating the first.That you reject reality reveals much about you...You present the article as proof that some conservatives are not taking Trump's (your childish spin dropped, you moron) "flip flopping lightly.
Yet, that article is obviously written not by Ann, but by some one who has NOTHING but contempt for Trump, his supporters and Ann Coulter.
The majority of the piece is nothing but mindless partisan blather and the Race Card.
And at the end, it has ZERO quotes from Ann's response to this issue.
It ends up claiming that she is "minimizing" this "reversal" which is a direct contradiction of the article's main point.
The article is a load of shit written by an asshole.
That you found it impressive reflects poorly on you.
Ann Coulter Criticizes Trump's Immigration Plan, Blames Ailes
Nothing in that article addresses any of my points above.
"Coulter remains a loyal Trump supporter. “I can criticize my guy and still support him,” Coulter said. “Since the convention, since his speech at the convention, he has not made any mistakes until now.
“The media just makes stuff up, reinterprets his words, doesn’t show people what he says, lies about him,” she added. “He’s been magnificent in every speech since the convention. And I think he should just keep doing that.”
And I never said his flip-flop on immigration caused Coulter to give up on Crazy Donald. That's your strawman. I posted that to show he got soft on immigration, saying he will no longer deport all the illegal aliens -- which is what you've been supporting in so many of your posts.
The first article was complete crap. It is alarming that that was not obvious to you.
I side with Ann on this one.
Trump's "softening" is being grossly exaggerated by the lefties,
AND, any "softening" is a terrible mistake.
The first article started off with 3 and a half paragraphs of unsupported partisan slander of it's enemies.
Then is started finally "quoting" Ann, in out of context sentence fragments, sometimes literally single fucking words, buried in more unsupported partisan slander.
It finishes with a number of conflicting "points" buried in more slander, with a generous heaping of Race Cards.
Even if you agree with writer ideologically, you should still expect better writing and less filler.