Do Republicans Not Understand How Moronic It Is To Blame Obama For Today's Economy Yet Won't Give..

Food stamp costs are going down, but more PEOPLE get them because their jobs suq- they get a little , no laws have changed, jobs just keep getting worse thanks to inflation. Great job, Pubbies. So, as usual, your arguments are pure propaganda, for dupes only.

And the republicans argue on why people also should not be paid more so it ensures that more people are on the dole.

Its a perfect loop of outrage
 
More stimulus, govt spending, borrowing, and centally planned "investment" is what is needed for growth... Lol
 
I can't believe you people say shit like that. It just blows my mind you could delude yourself to such fallacy manufactured straight from the Fox News propaganda machine. For Christ's sakes. Think for yourself for once. Learn actual facts. They exist.
We have far more government dependence today than 6 years ago, despite an improving economy. That is unprecedented.
So remind me how SJ's statement is wrong.
That's what happens when you have a Great Recession. Millions of people lost their jobs against their will. Should we just let them starve?
But dependence is increasing during the recovery. Did you miss that tidbit?
On what programs exactly? By how much?
Chart of the Week Food stamp enrollment by state over time Pew Research Center
For example.
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
 
We have far more government dependence today than 6 years ago, despite an improving economy. That is unprecedented.
So remind me how SJ's statement is wrong.
That's what happens when you have a Great Recession. Millions of people lost their jobs against their will. Should we just let them starve?
But dependence is increasing during the recovery. Did you miss that tidbit?
On what programs exactly? By how much?
Chart of the Week Food stamp enrollment by state over time Pew Research Center
For example.
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
 
Kaz, your list is total Fox Noise BS, for dupes only...
Billy, CC and now Franco. What a lineup! :biggrin:

The axis of stupid.

W was responsible for a recession that started six months before he became President. Obama never will be responsible for the economy over two terms in office.
You're right he does bare responsibility. His stimulus alone created close to 3 million private jobs
 
That's what happens when you have a Great Recession. Millions of people lost their jobs against their will. Should we just let them starve?
But dependence is increasing during the recovery. Did you miss that tidbit?
On what programs exactly? By how much?
Chart of the Week Food stamp enrollment by state over time Pew Research Center
For example.
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
 
But dependence is increasing during the recovery. Did you miss that tidbit?
On what programs exactly? By how much?
Chart of the Week Food stamp enrollment by state over time Pew Research Center
For example.
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
Low information strikes again. ANother idiot who cant read a chart.
 
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
Low information strikes again. ANother idiot who cant read a chart.
Lol you're too much.
 
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
Low information strikes again. ANother idiot who cant read a chart.
Lol you're too much.
Translation: You're right and I've got nothing.
 
This article makes no mention of a increase still happening. The sharp increase the article refers to right after the hit of the Great Recession. Since then there is no evidence it is still rising.

Do you even read the articles you post?
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
Low information strikes again. ANother idiot who cant read a chart.
Lol you're too much.
Translation: You're right and I've got nothing.
Yes you are correct. I am right and you have nothing. You are making progress!
 
Kaz, your list is total Fox Noise BS, for dupes only...
Billy, CC and now Franco. What a lineup! :biggrin:

The axis of stupid.

W was responsible for a recession that started six months before he became President. Obama never will be responsible for the economy over two terms in office.
You're right he does bare responsibility. His stimulus alone created close to 3 million private jobs

LOL, you think the economy is good? You need to get out more. What cave do you live in? Or is it Obamatown? How's the kool-aid?
 
Kaz, your list is total Fox Noise BS, for dupes only...
Billy, CC and now Franco. What a lineup! :biggrin:

The axis of stupid.

W was responsible for a recession that started six months before he became President. Obama never will be responsible for the economy over two terms in office.
You're right he does bare responsibility. His stimulus alone created close to 3 million private jobs

LOL, you think the economy is good? You need to get out more. What cave do you live in? Or is it Obamatown? How's the kool-aid?
I never said the economy was good. My point is that his stimulus created twice as many private jobs in both of Bush's terms. More proof that trickle down economics is a sham.
 
Kaz, your list is total Fox Noise BS, for dupes only...
Billy, CC and now Franco. What a lineup! :biggrin:

The axis of stupid.

W was responsible for a recession that started six months before he became President. Obama never will be responsible for the economy over two terms in office.
You're right he does bare responsibility. His stimulus alone created close to 3 million private jobs

LOL, you think the economy is good? You need to get out more. What cave do you live in? Or is it Obamatown? How's the kool-aid?
I never said the economy was good. My point is that his stimulus created twice as many private jobs in both of Bush's terms. More proof that trickle down economics is a sham.

I didn't say anything about the stimulus, I talked about the economy. Look man, if you want to respond to the voices in your head that's fine, but just so you know, the rest of us don't hear them and don't know what you are talking about.
 
...any blame to Bush for it? You have this mantra that liberals love to blame Bush for everything yet when it is so obvious something is Bush's fault you still say that bullshit.

Now it's debatable how much Bush had to do with the Great Recession but I think it is safe to say he at least contributed a small part to it (TIME has a great article on that). Despite that, you put most of the blame on Obama for the economy that he inherited and it's just fucking stupid.

According to the CBO, Obama's stimulus alone created close to 3 million private jobs. Not only that, but we have seen twice as many private sector jobs created in his first term than in both of Bush's. These are facts. The stock market has never been better. You can whine about them being false but they are very much true.

I think it's absolutely ridiculous to say this recovery has been "slow". The economy lost 8 million jobs to that recession. What kind of job growth are you repubs expecting? What would be suitable for you? A million jobs a month? Do you not see how ridiculous that sounds? Do you really expect any economy from any part of the globe to get a million jobs a month? That seems to be what you clowns are demanding. I mean how many jobs should we be creating every month? Why is it Obama's fault we haven't your magic number? Nowadays, we have regained all the jobs we lost. Yes, you can whine about it not keeping up with population growth if you want but it is still true.

Oh, and some of you love to bring up the small number of parttime jobs created under Obama. Tell me, if job creators are wealthier than they have ever been, why is it that you don't put any blame on them for the economic mess this country suffered? Why don't you ask them where all the full time jobs are?

Obama 8217 s Numbers July 2014 Update
Hey the problem is not the economy because it is so big any idiot can see some growth.
But when this specific "idiot" puts in place an agenda that is "anti-business" and "anti-growth"... that is the problem.
This economy would be humming at 4 to 6% annual increase in GDP IF this IDIOT in CHIEF clearly stating his preferences just shut up and did NOTHING!
But this I-I-C being the total economic numbskull has SAID:
A) "I prefer to put out of business 1,300 businesses that pay $100 billion a year in taxes while employing 400,000 people". Obama has actually said this!
B) "I prefer higher gas prices"... and he has seen his preferences by his signing 40% less in Federal leases and Federal leases producing 20% lease oil!
C) "Utility rates will skyrocket as if a utility wants to burn coal they will go bankrupt"! Think about folks...this guy WANTS to see companies go bankrupt!
There are more exact verbiage from this I-I-C that shows if he had JUST shut his mouth the economy would be doing even BETTER!!!
 
That's because the data only go so far.
Idiot.
You're a total idiot, Billy, with your stupid fucking troll threads, your deflections, and your low information.
Lol dude it's in the fucking graph at the top of the article. It has leveled out.
Low information strikes again. ANother idiot who cant read a chart.
Lol you're too much.
Translation: You're right and I've got nothing.
Yes you are correct. I am right and you have nothing. You are making progress!
Good! So we agree you are a brainless monkey fart without a serious thought in your head. Wasn't hard, was it?
 
Another Billy Zippo troll thread.
Hey, Billy. Fixing to get your ass beaten again so you can run away like a coward?
Obama has been president for 6 years. For the first 2 years he could and did enact any legislation he wanted. If the present economy isn't Obama's fault, whose fault is it? Bush? He's been out of office for 6years. For the last two years of his term he had a solid Democrat majority in Congress.
We have the worst recovery on record. That is simply a fact. We have the fewest people working since the 1970s. That is a fact. The gains in household wealth have accrued at the top. That is a fact. Income inequality is worse now than it was 6 years ago. That is a fact.
And all of thsoe things are directly traceable to Obama's policies.
Oh, sure it was dumb of Obama to extend Bush's awful tax cuts for the wealthy, but that is literally the only thing by Obama that has contributed to the rising inequality. Of course he did help the lower classes by giving the middle class the biggest tax cut since Reagan. Bush was too much of a moron to understand the vitality of the middle class.

How moronic do you think you sound by putting all the blame on the democratic congress. God it's so pathetic and transparent.
What's "moronic", Billy is that you can't grasp that Obama's total lack of an economic strategy to create jobs and grow the economy FOR YEARS NOW has been the thing that's created the "inequality" you liberals are so obsessed by! Compared to the rest of the country, the rich got richer under Barry than under any President in history.

Tell me what Barack Obama's strategy has been to create jobs for the past two years, Billy? Tell me who his chief economic advisers are! I doubt you can...and the REASON for that is the US hasn't HAD any strategy to grow the economy and create jobs since Larry Summers little Keynesian "lab experiment" was such a disaster they had to create a new economic statistic "jobs created or saved" to hide how bad it was!
Maybe he would put forth more of a strategy if republicans didn't block anything he has ever come up with. Maybe by now we would have another stimulus. Yes, that would mean more debt but so does any stimulus including tax cuts.

For God's sake, Billy...you couldn't even get Democrats to vote for Barry's last request for another stimulus because they knew the last one didn't create jobs and they'd get roasted for supporting a "do-over".

Blaming the GOP for Obama's total lack of a plan to create jobs and grow the economy is amusing. If you're the President you do the work...you put together the plan...then you sell it to the American people and let THEM pressure Congress into adopting it!

You can't tell me what Barry's plan is because he hasn't done the work...he doesn't have a plan...and all he sells to the American people is a "blame the GOP" narrative.
 
Why are you talking about the poor? I made no mention of them you ass clown. Tax cuts for the wealthy are bad because they do very little to stimulate economic growth and the wealthy are responsible for most our country's revenue.
And yet, the Obama forced a Dem-controlled Congress to extend those tax cuts for 2 years.
How was that Bush's fault?
How did that help the economy?
Do you even read these posts? I already said it was idiotic for Obama to extend Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. It was his worse mistake.

He really didn't have a choice. I assume someone in his Administration who actually UNDERSTOOD economics explained to Barry that raising taxes in the middle of a recession was really bad economic policy! It probably took whoever it was a LONG time to get that collection of idiots to grasp simple economic theory. My guess is it was Larry Summers and Christina Romer doing the honors and when they were done they were so worn out from the effort that both needed to resign and go rest up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top