Destroying the Constitution

What would that accomplish? It may not be needed now but that is no excuse for abolishing it. It could possibly become needed in some dystopian future which I hope never happens.

I think loyal Americans should be forced to house our troops

Repeal the Third Amendment
 
The evens of January 6, 2021, would never have happened if several states had not enacted policies that were illegal. Things like mailing mail-in ballots to people who had not ordered them. Using illegal drop boxes where anyone could stuff them with illegal ballots. When Congress met to finish the process of electing the next president, there were serious doubts about the vote count in several states. Whether or not any skulduggery happened in 2020, it sure made people aware that things like that can happen. We need to increase the security of the vote. Voters' ID would be a big help. I would have been there to demonstrate my concern about the election if I could have been. No one there was there to destroy our democracy, only to protect it.

Mail in Ballots!
Drop Boxes!

:ack-1:

Lets attack the Capitol and Hang Mike Pence!

<Trump will only vote by mail>
 
As soon as you throw the "Women have penises" freaks out of yours, lol.

A simple question on the 2nd amendment: Is a 3-6 month waiting period, 20-30 pages of paperwork, and $500 in fees just to keep a revolver in your own house or apartment infringement or not?
Sorry, I must have missed the word "penis" in the Constitution.

I don't know of any state that has a 3-6 month waiting period. No one is talking about banning guns (which is the point you are driving at). And we aren't talking about handguns.
To answer your question, no, it's not infringement. The state makes those rules. Are you for state's rights or not? :)
 
Sorry, I must have missed the word "penis" in the Constitution.

I don't know of any state that has a 3-6 month waiting period. No one is talking about banning guns (which is the point you are driving at). And we aren't talking about handguns.
To answer your question, no, it's not infringement. The state makes those rules. Are you for state's rights or not? :)

By not calling it infringement while denying it, you just show you aren't worth debating, you Kamala pegged soi boi cuck.

FOAD.
 
By not calling it infringement while denying it, you just show you aren't worth debating, you Kamala pegged soi boi cuck.

FOAD.
Oh close it, Gandalf. You can't even be bothered to stay on topic...hell, you can't even be bothered to address the response.
It is not infringement. Please list for me the states that require a 3-6 month waiting period to purchase a handgun.
 
Oh close it, Gandalf. You can't even be bothered to stay on topic...hell, you can't even be bothered to address the response.
It is not infringement. Please list for me the states that require a 3-6 month waiting period to purchase a handgun.

I just did, New York City, not a State but a place.

and that's just for a home use permit.

And that's what your side wants for everyone.
 
I just did, New York City, not a State but a place.

and that's just for a home use permit.

And that's what your side wants for everyone.
The City. Not the state.

And no one is proposing anything of the sort.
But keep up your constant "slippery slope" braying about implementing common sense regulations.
Soon, NYC's type of regulation will find it's way to every corner of the country.
And we'll have people like you to thank for it.
 
Ok lefties, here is your chance. Which constitutional right would you like to see destroyed first? I've seen lefties aggressively going after the right to bear arms and freedom of speech, but maybe there is another right that you would like to see destroyed first? Please post the constitutional right that you want to see crushed the most.

Well they already eliminated the 4th Amendment
 
The City. Not the state.

And no one is proposing anything of the sort.
But keep up your constant "slippery slope" braying about implementing common sense regulations.
Soon, NYC's type of regulation will find it's way to every corner of the country.
And we'll have people like you to thank for it.

NYC is in NY State, and the current governor seems to be gun control trigger happy right now.

No, we have SJW's like you to thank for it, who have decided to gut our police forces to get your socialist utopia.
 
Start a thread about that.

Which part of the constitution do you want to destroy the most? You are a commie who supports censorship of free speech and infringing on our right to bear arms. So don't even try to say you are ok with the constitution. Lefties cannot survive in a free state, your very survival as a filthy commie depends on dismantling the constitution. Just post the part of it that you want to dismantle first.
So you hate left handed people?
 
Ok lefties, here is your chance. Which constitutional right would you like to see destroyed first? I've seen lefties aggressively going after the right to bear arms and freedom of speech, but maybe there is another right that you would like to see destroyed first? Please post the constitutional right that you want to see crushed the most.
Even Amendments can be amended, there's a clue in it's name.

Societies change, technology change, customs change. A codified and non codified constitution should be constantly amended to be suitable for the current generation.
 
None of them. The thing you fail to keep in mind is there are limits to these "rights". Which is what people argue over. There are some who believe the Constitution was meant to be living, breathing document that changed with the times. But its basic tenants would hold. For example, you bray about liberty and freedom. But what you really mean is liberty and freedom..for some. Only those "some" you deem worthy. Not those "different" people.

The only thing I want to see crushed here is the right wing in this country.
Oh, and I'd like to see real conservatives rise up and kick the riff-raff out of their movement.
These "limits" are fictions invented by Stalinist douchebags like you. The only limitations on our rights is where they conflict with some other right. "Substantial governmental interest" isn't mentioned in the Constitution.
 
Its weird how lefties evade the question that the thread is about. It's like they want to hide their hatred for the constitution, as well as their desire to change, censor, dismantle, suppress, deplatform or destroy it.
 
NYC is in NY State, and the current governor seems to be gun control trigger happy right now.

No, we have SJW's like you to thank for it, who have decided to gut our police forces to get your socialist utopia.
Again, you have your panties in a twist over nothing. But that's today's right wing. Devoid of any substance
so outrage is all you have left. Outrage only lasts so long.
 
Wow, that must of took a lot of thought from you, that is your most coherent thought you have made on this board, it’s stupid, unintelligent, and shows what an idiot you are but you are making progress.
 
Crazy that the left can’t honestly answer this question. Don’t ask them to define a women either!
 
Last edited:
Crazy that the left can’t honestly answer this question. Don’t ask them to define a women either!
It was answered. But her question is worthless. It's designed to elicit a response for right wing ammunition and outrage. So, like her worthless Omicron death posts, she just pounds the same narrative post after post.
 

Forum List

Back
Top