Cuomo interviews Lavar Ball - Insanity

[Slade3200]

Am I tripping or is this not the craziest interview that’s you’ve seen lately? I bet Trump is loving this guy, they are both cut from the same cloth!

I dare you to watch the whole thing

 

[MACAULAY]

Agree, very very fucked up man.

 

[Snouter]

Wow, that Afro American is a sick, retarded fuck. "4.0 student." The scary thing is, there are tons of Afro Americans who are similarly fucked up in terms of dealing with reality. Did Cuomo ask him what he did to support himself financially?

What is kind of interesting is the Sfaccime's* son actually doing something that does not attack our President.

The Sfaccime was Governor Cuomo before the current Governor Cuomo. NY suffers for democrat douchebaggery and yamicas so family members often get voted in like Crooked Hillary assumed would happen, but the yamicas failed...and are still working to undo what they failed to do.

 

[Esmeralda]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV? I bet Trump is loving this guy, they are both cut from the same cloth!

I dare you to watch the whole thing

Yep, "they are both cut from the same cloth" Both on the same intellectual level.

I think that Ball is saying that Trump didn't go to China with the purpose of getting the ball players. That he only helped them because he happened to be there. Had Trump not already been there, he would not have bothered with those young men.

 

[Snouter]

Esmeralda, who are you referring to as being as retarded as Lever Ball?

 

[usmbguest5318]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV?

You're not "tripping." I too thought that was a bizarre interview.

Eventually Ball got round to stating his point, but it was like pulling teeth to get him to do so.

I have to say I don't know that Trump had much or anything to do with the three students' release from the hotel in which they were confined. For all I know, China merely had the boys sequestered in advance of deporting them. Based on my experience with a staff member who overstayed his visa, the Chinese people and law enforcement officers are unlikely to be of a mind to put in their jails foreigners who commit rather innocuous misdeeds. (Shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and then returning them is something the Chinese would consider innocuous enough that they'd rather "fry bigger fish.") They seem to me quite content to send people packing back to their home country and let bygones be bygones.

China hasn't remarked upon the nature and extent to which Trump was instrumental in securing the boys' release. Neither has China remarked upon what, if any, concessions they received in return for having acquiesced to Trump's alleged request that the boys be released. Even as I suspect China was simply going to deport the boys, I suspect too they are not above using and would have been thrilled to use the boys as a bargaining chip of some sort. What's surprising to me is that "Art of the Deal" Trump would have played into allowing that to happen. Maybe Trump did; maybe he didn't.

Be all that as it may, what I know is that Trump (and Trump cronies) is the only one asserting that he effected the boys' release, and I know quite well that there are all manners of details that Trump misrepresents. It's not even remotely beneath him to palter about his role in the boys' release. As a result, I, like Mr. Ball have no idea whether Trump personally secured the boys' release. All I know is Trump says he did.

 

[Slade3200]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV?

You're not "tripping." I too thought that was a bizarre interview.

Eventually Ball got round to stating his point, but it was like pulling teeth to get him to do so.

I have to say I don't know that Trump had much or anything to do with the three students' release from the hotel in which they were confined. For all I know, China merely had the boys sequestered in advance of deporting them. Based on my experience with a staff member who overstayed his visa, the Chinese people and law enforcement officers are unlikely to be of a mind to put in their jails foreigners who commit rather innocuous misdeeds. (Shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and then returning them is something the Chinese would consider innocuous enough that they'd rather "fry bigger fish.") They seem to me quite content to send people packing back to their home country and let bygones be bygones.

China hasn't remarked upon the nature and extent to which Trump was instrumental in securing the boys' release. Neither has China remarked upon what, if any, concessions they received in return for having acquiesced to Trump's alleged request that the boys be released. Even as I suspect China was simply going to deport the boys, I suspect too they are not above using and would have been thrilled to use the boys as a bargaining chip of some sort. What's surprising to me is that "Art of the Deal" Trump would have played into allowing that to happen. Maybe Trump did; maybe he didn't.

Be all that as it may, what I know is that Trump (and Trump cronies) is the only one asserting that he effected the boys' release, and I know quite well that there are all manners of details that Trump misrepresents. It's not even remotely beneath him to palter about his role in the boys' release. As a result, I, like Mr. Ball have no idea whether Trump personally secured the boys' release. All I know is Trump says he did.

I read your post and hear others with similar suspicions and it highlights the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country. It’s quite sad. But if you look at the situation from outside the clouded goggles of suspicion I think flat out lying about something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch. Even for a a guy like Trump. I think he did something good then tooted his own horn about it as he loves to do

 

[usmbguest5318]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV?

You're not "tripping." I too thought that was a bizarre interview.

Eventually Ball got round to stating his point, but it was like pulling teeth to get him to do so.

I have to say I don't know that Trump had much or anything to do with the three students' release from the hotel in which they were confined. For all I know, China merely had the boys sequestered in advance of deporting them. Based on my experience with a staff member who overstayed his visa, the Chinese people and law enforcement officers are unlikely to be of a mind to put in their jails foreigners who commit rather innocuous misdeeds. (Shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and then returning them is something the Chinese would consider innocuous enough that they'd rather "fry bigger fish.") They seem to me quite content to send people packing back to their home country and let bygones be bygones.

China hasn't remarked upon the nature and extent to which Trump was instrumental in securing the boys' release. Neither has China remarked upon what, if any, concessions they received in return for having acquiesced to Trump's alleged request that the boys be released. Even as I suspect China was simply going to deport the boys, I suspect too they are not above using and would have been thrilled to use the boys as a bargaining chip of some sort. What's surprising to me is that "Art of the Deal" Trump would have played into allowing that to happen. Maybe Trump did; maybe he didn't.

Be all that as it may, what I know is that Trump (and Trump cronies) is the only one asserting that he effected the boys' release, and I know quite well that there are all manners of details that Trump misrepresents. It's not even remotely beneath him to palter about his role in the boys' release. As a result, I, like Mr. Ball have no idea whether Trump personally secured the boys' release. All I know is Trump says he did.

I read your post and hear others with similar suspicions and it highlight the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country. It’s quite sad. But if you look at the situation from outside the clouded goggles of suspicion I think flat out lying about something so trivial and something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch. Even for a a guy like Trump. I think he did something good then tooted his own horn about it as he loves to do

the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country.

Let me be clear because apparently I wasn't clear enough. It is not the country I don't trust. It's Donald Trump's word for things that I do not trust.

something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch.

Trivial? Easily refuted? Donald Trump asserted that he owns(-ed) the tallest building in NYC. One need not even solicit a foreign power to find that is not the truth, and that is surely less trivial than the release of three Americans from Chinese custody.

Why would China say anything about it? From their point, regardless of what the facts are, it either is too trivial for them to comment on, or they go what they wanted from the exchange and no value accrues to them by disputing Trump.

 

[Slade3200]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV?

You're not "tripping." I too thought that was a bizarre interview.

Eventually Ball got round to stating his point, but it was like pulling teeth to get him to do so.

I have to say I don't know that Trump had much or anything to do with the three students' release from the hotel in which they were confined. For all I know, China merely had the boys sequestered in advance of deporting them. Based on my experience with a staff member who overstayed his visa, the Chinese people and law enforcement officers are unlikely to be of a mind to put in their jails foreigners who commit rather innocuous misdeeds. (Shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and then returning them is something the Chinese would consider innocuous enough that they'd rather "fry bigger fish.") They seem to me quite content to send people packing back to their home country and let bygones be bygones.

China hasn't remarked upon the nature and extent to which Trump was instrumental in securing the boys' release. Neither has China remarked upon what, if any, concessions they received in return for having acquiesced to Trump's alleged request that the boys be released. Even as I suspect China was simply going to deport the boys, I suspect too they are not above using and would have been thrilled to use the boys as a bargaining chip of some sort. What's surprising to me is that "Art of the Deal" Trump would have played into allowing that to happen. Maybe Trump did; maybe he didn't.

Be all that as it may, what I know is that Trump (and Trump cronies) is the only one asserting that he effected the boys' release, and I know quite well that there are all manners of details that Trump misrepresents. It's not even remotely beneath him to palter about his role in the boys' release. As a result, I, like Mr. Ball have no idea whether Trump personally secured the boys' release. All I know is Trump says he did.

I read your post and hear others with similar suspicions and it highlight the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country. It’s quite sad. But if you look at the situation from outside the clouded goggles of suspicion I think flat out lying about something so trivial and something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch. Even for a a guy like Trump. I think he did something good then tooted his own horn about it as he loves to do

the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country.

Let me be clear because apparently I wasn't clear enough. It is not the country I don't trust. It's Donald Trump's word for things that I do not trust.

Oh yeah I got that. I wasn’t saying people mistrust the country, I was saying that many in this country have mistrust in our leader

 

[usmbguest5318]

I think he did something good then tooted his own horn about it as he loves to do

Well, okay, you can think that. For my part, I don't know whether he did something at all, but I do know he claimed to have done and tooted his horn in accordance with his claim.

 

[usmbguest5318]

something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch.

Trivial? Easily refuted? Donald Trump asserted that after 9/11, he owned the tallest building in NYC. [1] One need not even solicit a foreign power that isn't particularly given to full disclosure to find that is not the truth, and that is surely less trivial than the release of three Americans from Chinese forced sequester.

Why would China say anything about it? From their point, regardless of what the facts are, it either is too trivial for them to comment on, or they go what they wanted from the exchange and no value accrues to them by disputing Trump.


Note:

1. Tell me how it is that a NYC real estate mogul at Trump's level of the "game," does not know whether he owns or doesn't own the tallest building in NYC. Such a person most certainly would know just as the woman with the biggest boobs in porn knows she's the owner of said boobs, or as the maker of the biggest truck or boat in the world knows they are the maker of such vehicles. Do you really think Bugatti didn't know what superlatives their Veyron didn't hold? Do baseball players not know what their ranking is as goes hits, home runs, at bats, etc? Quite simply, every holder of an objectively measured superlative knows they hold that "title."
   
   What Trump likely also knew (knows) is that most people, even New Yorkers, probably have/had no idea what building, after the WTC buildings fell, was the tallest in NYC, and he played on their ignorance to make his claim. that he owned the tallest building in NYC after the WTC fell. I see no reason to think that as goes the matter of the boys whom China sequestered in their hotel room, Trump is again relying on people's ignorance and the unlikelihood that China will even remark upon the matter.

 

[DarkFury]

That dad is a POS!

 

[usmbguest5318]

Am I tripping or is this the craziest interview that’s been on TV?

You're not "tripping." I too thought that was a bizarre interview.

Eventually Ball got round to stating his point, but it was like pulling teeth to get him to do so.

I have to say I don't know that Trump had much or anything to do with the three students' release from the hotel in which they were confined. For all I know, China merely had the boys sequestered in advance of deporting them. Based on my experience with a staff member who overstayed his visa, the Chinese people and law enforcement officers are unlikely to be of a mind to put in their jails foreigners who commit rather innocuous misdeeds. (Shoplifting a pair of sunglasses and then returning them is something the Chinese would consider innocuous enough that they'd rather "fry bigger fish.") They seem to me quite content to send people packing back to their home country and let bygones be bygones.

China hasn't remarked upon the nature and extent to which Trump was instrumental in securing the boys' release. Neither has China remarked upon what, if any, concessions they received in return for having acquiesced to Trump's alleged request that the boys be released. Even as I suspect China was simply going to deport the boys, I suspect too they are not above using and would have been thrilled to use the boys as a bargaining chip of some sort. What's surprising to me is that "Art of the Deal" Trump would have played into allowing that to happen. Maybe Trump did; maybe he didn't.

Be all that as it may, what I know is that Trump (and Trump cronies) is the only one asserting that he effected the boys' release, and I know quite well that there are all manners of details that Trump misrepresents. It's not even remotely beneath him to palter about his role in the boys' release. As a result, I, like Mr. Ball have no idea whether Trump personally secured the boys' release. All I know is Trump says he did.

I read your post and hear others with similar suspicions and it highlight the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country. It’s quite sad. But if you look at the situation from outside the clouded goggles of suspicion I think flat out lying about something so trivial and something that could be so easily desputed by China would be a stretch. Even for a a guy like Trump. I think he did something good then tooted his own horn about it as he loves to do

the unfortunate and extreme level of mistrust we have in this country.

Let me be clear because apparently I wasn't clear enough. It is not the country I don't trust. It's Donald Trump's word for things that I do not trust.

Oh yeah I got that. I wasn’t saying people mistrust the country, I was saying that many in this country have mistrust in our leader

I was saying that many in this country have mistrust in our leader

For good reason....

 

[Meathead]

Good God, even with Cuomo trying to guide him to a coherent response to Trump, the guy could still not articulate anything.

"I ain't took a shot at him!"

What a pathetic idiot!

 

[Meathead]

Am I tripping or is this not the craziest interview that’s you’ve seen lately? I bet Trump is loving this guy, they are both cut from the same cloth!

I dare you to watch the whole thing

Let's guess Ball's IQ. 65, charitably 70. Class -zero.

 

[Snouter]

I am surprised the savage did not take issue with the adult male who stole shit and embarrassed the USA being called a "boy."

 

[Two Thumbs]

all that nut had to do was keep his fool mouth shut.

he didn't have to say thank you, just had to keep his mouth shut, but like the lime light lemming that he is...

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Lavar Ball...wow. What a genius.


Lavar is the great negotiator, not Trump.

 

[Montrovant]

For those who don't want to watch the interview: Lavar Ball's 39 most amazing lines on Donald Trump in Monday's CNN interview - CNNPolitics

 

[Crixus]

Am I tripping or is this not the craziest interview that’s you’ve seen lately? I bet Trump is loving this guy, they are both cut from the same cloth!

I dare you to watch the whole thing

Meh, stupid hoodrat should have raised his chirens better.