If you have evidence . Provide it.
The claim is made during every weather event that the evidence is mounting. But they never actually cite any scientific study and all observation of storms and weather patterns is still within the natural variability.
I don't give a rats butt about claims that the evidence is rising, I want you to provide two pieces of evidence that are not computer derived fiction, or opinion.
I want you to provide ONE example supported by empirical data.
What is it that you don't understand about "there is very little evidence to prove....or, they never actually cite any scientific study"? Especially when all the observations so far are within the natural variations or margins so to speak.
I do give a flying rodents butt. They point to something that might exist, but the evidence is, as of yet, inconclusive as to the effects this small amount of warming has had on extreme weather events.
That's the whole point. If they had evidence they would provide it. instead they do everything in their power to try and prevent discussion of what they do have. Which, over and over and over is shown to be false studies done by vested people who need the government to enact laws that will make them rich.
To date there has been NO empirical evidence presented at all.
I don't know about the false study aspect of the scientists work, but I'd point to a false, or misleading representations of what the studies actually say by those with a vested interest.
Take a look at the computer models that are in use. A couple of years ago they were tested and it was found that no matter what numbers you punched in to them, they would ALWAYS result in warming.
That is a fatal flaw that they have never addressed.