Josf
Active Member
- Apr 20, 2015
- 379
- 21
- 26
- Thread starter
- #21
Before returning to Elliot's Debates where defenders are battling with offenders while defenders are figuring out how to justify the paying of costs (past, present, and future) associated with defense, and offenders are figuring out how to con their victims into paying all the costs while they (the criminals) take all the benefits, before returning to 1786, I thought other people might appreciate the following links concerning the concept of "Pro se"
1.
Bonding Code
"To act in pro se fashion in a court of law or equity is to profess in law, thus, casting yourself to drift away from logic and into the arms of a fool."
2.
https://ucadia.s3.amazonaws.com/audio_reference/law_01_the_fundamentals.pdf
"For several hundred years, Roman Courts have been falsely converting Natural Persons into Things, this denying logic, reason and justice. Some people even volunteer to declare themselves things, when they accept being “Pro Se”, short for “Pro Se in Rem” or declaration “I am a Thing”."
1.
Bonding Code
"To act in pro se fashion in a court of law or equity is to profess in law, thus, casting yourself to drift away from logic and into the arms of a fool."
2.
https://ucadia.s3.amazonaws.com/audio_reference/law_01_the_fundamentals.pdf
"For several hundred years, Roman Courts have been falsely converting Natural Persons into Things, this denying logic, reason and justice. Some people even volunteer to declare themselves things, when they accept being “Pro Se”, short for “Pro Se in Rem” or declaration “I am a Thing”."