Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Seriously, with the Russian collusion "investigation" ongoing, so to speak, and with what we have seen in general of the swamp in Washington, if any collusion existed, wouldn't some democrat have already leaked the path to its proof?
Fair point!Seriously, with the Russian collusion "investigation" ongoing, so to speak, and with what we have seen in general of the swamp in Washington, if any collusion existed, wouldn't some democrat have already leaked the path to its proof?
Seriously, with the Russian collusion "investigation" ongoing, so to speak, and with what we have seen in general of the swamp in Washington, if any collusion existed, wouldn't some democrat have already leaked the path to its proof?
First, the word you are looking for is "conspiracy".Seriously, with the Russian collusion "investigation" ongoing, so to speak, and with what we have seen in general of the swamp in Washington, if any collusion existed, wouldn't some democrat have already leaked the path to its proof?
Exactly. Ita a lot of stuff focusing on a man who is good at riding the edge of the law and decency.It's a meddling investigation. No it's interference. No it's collusion. No it's a Michael Cohen investigation. No it's a porn star investigation. No wait it's......
So no input on the OP?Exactly. Ita a lot of stuff focusing on a man who is good at riding the edge of the law and decency.It's a meddling investigation. No it's interference. No it's collusion. No it's a Michael Cohen investigation. No it's a porn star investigation. No wait it's......
They probably aren't gonna send him to jail.
This probably somehow isn't gonna end his marriage.
Who am I talking about? Bill Clinton?
Nope, Donald Trump.
Guess those of you all who bashed Clinton for 20 years but are defending Trump now are gonna just sign the "I'm a hypocrite" document with your past posts. Or maybe come clean and admit you support whatever your team does? Or accept the check and keep on posting?
So no input on the OP?Exactly. Ita a lot of stuff focusing on a man who is good at riding the edge of the law and decency.It's a meddling investigation. No it's interference. No it's collusion. No it's a Michael Cohen investigation. No it's a porn star investigation. No wait it's......
They probably aren't gonna send him to jail.
This probably somehow isn't gonna end his marriage.
Who am I talking about? Bill Clinton?
Nope, Donald Trump.
Guess those of you all who bashed Clinton for 20 years but are defending Trump now are gonna just sign the "I'm a hypocrite" document with your past posts. Or maybe come clean and admit you support whatever your team does? Or accept the check and keep on posting?
This is wandering into team worship/conspiracy theory land.
My guess is we're gonna find some Trump boys got all excited and met with russian mobster types but they never wrote a check to any KGB employees. Trump says plenty of ridiculous things so we won't be able to prove he was signaling Russians or anything like that.
We'll also "find out" Donald paid off some porn stars he grabbed or slept with but is that really more surprising than if he did not? Look at his trophy wife collection. Bill Clinton would be proud (gotta be bi partisan because the only reason this matters is because of all the flack Bill took).
And here I thought liberals were all the rage about what people did behind there bedroom doors was no ones business? I still say, besides all the drift, that if there was anything to this bogus witch hunt some dem would have leaked it all out.So no input on the OP?Exactly. Ita a lot of stuff focusing on a man who is good at riding the edge of the law and decency.It's a meddling investigation. No it's interference. No it's collusion. No it's a Michael Cohen investigation. No it's a porn star investigation. No wait it's......
They probably aren't gonna send him to jail.
This probably somehow isn't gonna end his marriage.
Who am I talking about? Bill Clinton?
Nope, Donald Trump.
Guess those of you all who bashed Clinton for 20 years but are defending Trump now are gonna just sign the "I'm a hypocrite" document with your past posts. Or maybe come clean and admit you support whatever your team does? Or accept the check and keep on posting?
Oh, I already gave that back at #6:
"This is wandering into team worship/conspiracy theory land.
My guess is we're gonna find some Trump boys got all excited and met with russian mobster types but they never wrote a check to any KGB employees. Trump says plenty of ridiculous things so we won't be able to prove he was signaling Russians or anything like that.
We'll also "find out" Donald paid off some porn stars he grabbed or slept with but is that really more surprising than if he did not? Look at his trophy wife collection. Bill Clinton would be proud (gotta be bi partisan because the only reason this matters is because of all the flack Bill took)."
Its pretty similar to what I responded with.
These investigators are gonna dig around a bit. Heck, they might even catch one of the boys actually breaking a law few ppl care about. Then just like last time the ACLU will come in and get the crook off on some technicality Oliver North - Wikipedia.
My prediction is AT WORST for Donald some tapes about him paying off porn stars will surface and we'll find out he paid off half the ones he's slept with but half the ones he's paid off he didn't sleep with making him look vulnerable and foolish. We'll probably also see some shady dealings but nothing illegal. The folks who dislike him will bring them up for decades every time someone brings up Hillary's shady dealings and the rest of us will be able to tell who the party cheerleaders are.
First, the word you are looking for is "conspiracy".
Second, why do you assume Mueller leaks just because your team can't keep a secret for 5 minutes in an empty room?
Third this doesn't belong in the clean debate room, there is no debate. Only and accusation.
1. tRump and co. are accused of conspiring with the Russian government to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Where have you been?First, the word you are looking for is "conspiracy".
Second, why do you assume Mueller leaks just because your team can't keep a secret for 5 minutes in an empty room?
Third this doesn't belong in the clean debate room, there is no debate. Only and accusation.
1. What conspiracy? Who is accused of doing what?
2. Irrelevant deflection.
3. Excellent analysis of the Mueller investigation.
Depends. If it proves other people are involved....Like EVERY person in congress..... Not saying it's true, or even plausible. If any "proof" would indicate people of great power (real or imagined) are involved, you can rest assured that no one who values their position (life?) would leak anything. If the stakes are high enough, it would take the morality of a saint (or a true patriot, in the vein of the signers of the Declaration of Independence) to risk being found out.Seriously, with the Russian collusion "investigation" ongoing, so to speak, and with what we have seen in general of the swamp in Washington, if any collusion existed, wouldn't some democrat have already leaked the path to its proof?
Could it be that it's here to be discussed civilly? Something that is difficult even here, and nearly impossible elsewhere on this board. Just a thought.I ask again, why is this accusation in the clean debate zone?
Then he probably should have started with something other than an unsubstantiated accusation.Could it be that it's here to be discussed civilly? Something that is difficult even here, and nearly impossible elsewhere on this board. Just a thought.I ask again, why is this accusation in the clean debate zone?
Just because you have nothing to debate/discuss about it, does not mean that there is nothing to be debated/discussed. I think the OP layed out a line of discussion quite clearly. If you missed it see post #1.
Your continued infatuation with why it's here instead of the elsewhere, suggests, to me, that you see no way of discussing it in a civil manner. If that is the case, why are YOU here? Seems to me it would be a colossal waste of your time.