CO2 at the highest level in 2.1 million years

[daveman]

The vacuum prevents energy escaping by convection or conduction, but not radiation. If you don't have anything absorbing infrared between the surface and space all the infrared radiation emitted from the surface is going to escape straight into space unhindered.

And if you were standing on the surface of Venus, you couldn't help but notice the big glowy thing in the sky that continually replaces all that lost IR.

If you were standing on the surface of Venus, I doubt that you could see the sun through the clouds and that atmosphere.

But surely even someone as dim as you could tell the difference between night and day on Venus.

 

[Old Rocks]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

Show us how this works in a lab.

I mean 40%!

WOW

Warmers have to change the whole atmosphere to 40% CO2 to get the deminimus increase in temperature they allege. When you see the experiments posted here by Chris, the kid added 400,000PPM of CO2.

But OR alleges that a 60PPM increase will show a rise in temperature, destroy coral reefs, melt ice caps, spawn killer tornadoes and Cat 5 hurricanes.

Show us, OR.

Show us how your EnviroMarxist Doomsday Cult theories hold up in a laboratory setting

 

[signelect]

They have no idea what the levels were 2 million years ago and not even 200 years ago, they had no way to measure it. they are pushing an agenda.

Figures never lie buy liars often figure

 

[Old Rocks]

They have no idea what the levels were 2 million years ago and not even 200 years ago, they had no way to measure it. they are pushing an agenda.

Figures never lie buy liars often figure

Are you really this stupid? Have you ever heard of ice cores, or proxies?

 

[signelect]

I have no doubt that the climate is slightly warming and the CO2 levels are higher but I have also heard the absurd arguments from the global warming experts, Al Gore and Michael Moore both of whom are making tons of money off this agenda so no I don't believe this BS but it is OK with me that you do.

 

[daveman]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

It's up to you to prove it will.

So far, you haven't.

 

[skookerasbil]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

Oh......and WTF w/ MWP s0n???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me guess..........The Santa Maria kicked off lots and lots of CO2??!!!!!


Ooooooops!!!!!!!!!!!


The fcuking k00ks can never answer that one...........





Hey Big.......I figured you'd love this one...................



.

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[waltky]

Granny says purt soon Florida gonna be underwater...

Study Details Significant Sea Level Rise
Monday, June 20, 2011 WASHINGTON (AP) — Sea level has been rising significantly over the past century of global warming, according to a study that offers the most detailed look yet at the changes in ocean levels during the last 2,100 years.

The researchers found that since the late 19th century — as the world became industrialized — sea level has risen more than 2 millimeters per year, on average. That's a bit less than one-tenth of an inch, but it adds up over time. It will lead to land loss, more flooding and saltwater invading bodies of fresh water, said lead researcher Benjamin Horton whose team examined sediment from North Carolina's Outer Banks. He directs the Sea Level Research Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania. The predicted effects he cites aren't new and are predicted by many climate scientists. But outside experts say the research verifies increasing sea level rise compared to previous centuries.

Kenneth Miller, chairman of the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Rutgers University, called the new report significant. "This is a very important contribution because it firmly establishes that the rise in sea level in the 20th century is unprecedented for the recent geologic past," said Miller, who was not part of the research team. Miller said he recently advised New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie that the state needs to plan for a sea level rise of about 3 feet by the end of the century. Horton said rising temperatures are the reason behind the higher sea level.

Looking back in history, the researchers found that sea level was relatively stable from 100 B.C. to A.D. 950. Then, during a warm climate period beginning in the 11th century, sea level rose by about half a millimeter per year for 400 years. That was followed by a second period of stable sea level associated with a cooler period, known as the Little Ice Age, which persisted until the late 19th century. Rising sea levels are among the hazards that concern environmentalists and governments with increasing global temperatures caused by "greenhouse" gases like carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels like coal and oil over the last century or so.

Although melting icebergs floating on the sea won't change sea level, there are millions of tons of ice piled up on land in Greenland, Antarctica and elsewhere. Melting that ice would have a major impact by raising ocean levels. The result could include flooding in highly populated coastal cities and greater storm damage in oceanfront communities. While the new study does not predict the future, Horton pointed out that it does show "there is a very close link between sea level and temperature. So for the 21st century when temperatures will rise, so will sea level."

MORE

 

[Chris]

I have no doubt that the climate is slightly warming and the CO2 levels are higher but I have also heard the absurd arguments from the global warming experts, Al Gore and Michael Moore both of whom are making tons of money off this agenda so no I don't believe this BS but it is OK with me that you do.

First you posted a lie by saying that there is "no way" to tell what CO2 levels were like 200 years ago.

The Antarctic ice core record goes back 600,000 years.

Then you make some comment about Al Gore and Michael Moore which is not at all relevant to the discussion.

 

[Chris]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

It's up to you to prove it will.

So far, you haven't.

Actually this was proven in 1859.

 

[daveman]

Spoken by someone so retarded that they deny that adding 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere can have any affect on the climate.

It's up to you to prove it will.

So far, you haven't.

Actually this was proven in 1859.

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

 

[konradv]

It's up to you to prove it will.

So far, you haven't.

Actually this was proven in 1859.

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

Of course not, because no one has ever said that. That's just a skeptic/denier strawman. The truth is that climate scientists are WELL AWARE that there are other factors in climate. They just can't find any other reason for a continued rise in temps, even when they use to "tricks" of the statistical trade to "hide the decline" from other sources, CO2 and the other GHGs still appear to be the major culprit. This ISN'T a two-variable experiment, despite what gets repeated constantly. ALL inputs are considered, but the deniers can't take the fact that scientifically, all other sources have been rejected. So they must make this a political controversy with only ther barest trappings of science, having already lost that debate.

 

[daveman]

Actually this was proven in 1859.

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

Of course not, because no one has ever said that. That's just a skeptic/denier strawman.

Everyone who points to the 1859 experiment as "proof" is saying exactly that.

The truth is that climate scientists are WELL AWARE that there are other factors in climate. They just can't find any other reason for a continued rise in temps, even when they use to "tricks" of the statistical trade to "hide the decline" from other sources, CO2 and the other GHGs still appear to be the major culprit. This ISN'T a two-variable experiment, despite what gets repeated constantly. ALL inputs are considered, but the deniers can't take the fact that scientifically, all other sources have been rejected. So they must make this a political controversy with only ther barest trappings of science, having already lost that debate.

And yet, despite being repeatedly shown the climate "scientists" are not engaging in actual science, you continue to believe them.

Maybe you can answer this question. No one else has been able to:

If the promoters of man-made climate fears truly believed the "debate is over" and the science is "settled", why is there such a strong impulse to shut down debate and threaten those who disagree?

 

[Chris]

It's up to you to prove it will.

So far, you haven't.

Actually this was proven in 1859.

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

Absolutely.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 by 40% causes the earth to retain more heat.

And we are going to add another 1,000 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere in the next century.

The only people who are denying it are the oil companies, the coal companies, and the their puppets in the Republican Party. Every natonal science organization on the planet recognizes global warming.

In fact the Republican Party is the only political party on the planet that denies global warming.

 

[daveman]

Actually this was proven in 1859.

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

Absolutely.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 by 40% causes the earth to retain more heat.

No. According to the experiment, it causes a container to retain more heat.

And we are going to add another 1,000 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere in the next century.

The only people who are denying it are the oil companies, the coal companies, and the their puppets in the Republican Party. Every natonal science organization on the planet recognizes global warming.

In fact the Republican Party is the only political party on the planet that denies global warming.

Follow the money...well, except for Hansen's, right?

 

[Chris]

So, here's one more guy who claims that an experiment with two variables at most will accurately represent the whole of the Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and the Sun's radiance.


You sure you wanna go with that?

Absolutely.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 by 40% causes the earth to retain more heat.

No. According to the experiment, it causes a container to retain more heat.

And we are going to add another 1,000 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere in the next century.

The only people who are denying it are the oil companies, the coal companies, and the their puppets in the Republican Party. Every natonal science organization on the planet recognizes global warming.

In fact the Republican Party is the only political party on the planet that denies global warming.

Follow the money...well, except for Hansen's, right?

Yes, follow the campaign money from the oil companies and the coal companies to the Republican Senators.

 

[westwall]

All this shows is that there is no correlation between CO2 content and global temperatures.
The temps have been much greater in the past and they have been much lower and all along CO2 stays pretty constant. The rise since the industrial revolution is so minor as to be undetectable by all but the most sophisticated machines.

 

[daveman]

Absolutely.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 by 40% causes the earth to retain more heat.

No. According to the experiment, it causes a container to retain more heat.

And we are going to add another 1,000 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere in the next century.

The only people who are denying it are the oil companies, the coal companies, and the their puppets in the Republican Party. Every natonal science organization on the planet recognizes global warming.

In fact the Republican Party is the only political party on the planet that denies global warming.

Follow the money...well, except for Hansen's, right?

Yes, follow the campaign money from the oil companies and the coal companies to the Republican Senators.

...but don't you DARE follow AGW supporters' money!