CNN airs Oct. 7 clip showing 'evidence of beheadings' by Hamas - Islamofascist "pAleStinIan" animalism

FDR_Reagan

Platinum Member
Nov 20, 2023
1,953
951
903
Too bad, they had to do it.

And we all know why.

Because of Gaza health ministry butchery Hamas "denying" it.


It reminds other such lowlife like that racist-troll Hitler fan here "questioning "... and hypocrically calls others as supposed "racist" - typical sick.

FYI

It is CNN which is rather often CNN biased against Israel..

===

CNN airs Oct. 7 clip from Nir Oz showing 'evidence of beheadings' by Hamas.
January 18, 2024, 12:00 am
CNN airs footage from Hamas’s October 7 onslaught, saying it shows a terrorist “sawing at the necks of dead Israelis, evidence of beheadings.”

The US network says an unnamed Israeli source provided the CCTV footage from Kibbutz Nir Oz, which is censored and edited to highlight the use of the knife.

WARNING: GRAPHIC FOOTAGE.

Elad Simchayoff @Elad_Si:
⚠️ Disturbing Content ⚠️
Footage obtained by @CNN shows a Hamas terrorist attempting to behead two Israeli victims in kibbutz Nir Oz.
A quarter of the 400 kibbutz residents were either murdered or abducted on October 7.
2:14 PM · Jan 17, 2024



 
Last edited:
It's again a question of which is the most egregious crime that will elicit sympathy for the victims?
Chopping them into little pieces or blowing them into little pieces with Zionist/US bombs from 30,000 feet?

I mean, dead is dead!

Somebody should ask one of the children who has no legs and no eyes.
 
It's again a question of which is the most ..
First of all, you're missing the point of baseness of a human being personal butchery. Vs any war, combat. Unless you're ISIS or pAlEsTiNiAn.

Why are you talking about sympathy instead of facts?

Here is more about facts.
Such as Pallywood numbers. Not to mention it is the pAlEsTiNiAns who are using civilians so that Israel looks bad.



The Lancet casualty methodology helps prove that Gaza deaths have been greatly exaggerated over the past month.

In early December, The Lancet published a peer-reviewed study that sought to prove that the Gaza Ministry of Health casualty counts were largely accurate.

Their methodology was to compare the number of deaths per thousand reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health with the number of deaths per thousand of UNRWA employees, which were counted independently by UNRWA and not the Hamas ministry.

They found that the two death rates were roughly the same (actually, UNRWA's was higher), indicating that the health ministry was not exaggerating the total number of deaths.

gr1.jpg


The methodology is flawed. It makes an assumption that everyone in Gaza has an equal chance of being killed, meaning that Israel is killing people randomly and indiscriminately. This is not only a false assumption, but an antisemitic one.

Indeed, one reason UNRWA workers could have been killed at a higher rate is because none of them are children - and more than half of them are males of fighting age. About two thirds of the first 101 killed were men, a higher percentage than the percentage of male employees at UNRWA (about 54% across UNRWA, not sure about Gaza itself.) Chances are that at least some of the UNRWA casualties were also legal combatants, either actively participating or acting as "spotters" or other support.

But there's another problem with this. If the Lancet methodology is correct, then it should be correct for every month of the war, not just the first month.

But over the past month, from December 15 to January 15, Hamas claims 5200 people were killed - 2.4 per thousand. But only 15 UNRWA employees were killed in that same timeframe - only 1.1 per thousand! (I'm assuming 13,500 UNRWA employees and 2.2 million total population of Gaza, which seems to be The Lancet's numbers.)

Using the Lancet's own methodology, even assuming the false assumption that UNRWA employees represent the entire population of Gaza rather than only adults and primarily males, the number of deaths claimed by Hamas is over double what their methodology would predict!

That's thousands of false Gaza deaths - using the methodology of this peer-reviewed paper.

Even if we accept that the Gaza health ministry had accurate information for the first month of the war, logic indicates that as Gaza infrastructure has deteriorated, the reliability of their figures has gone down as well. As we showed earlier, even the UN no longer parrots the Hamas claims that 70% of the deaths are women and children. There is no reason to believe the ministry of health figures over the past two months given that we know their "70% women and children" number is pure propaganda.

Which strongly indicates that Hamas is mandating how many deaths to claim, and the relationship with reality is increasingly tenuous as the war goes on and as Hamas sees its figures accepted as truth worldwide.

Beyond that, would the Lancet even consider publishing a paper using the exact same methodology for the time period of December 15-January 15 as I've shown here? I highly doubt it. Which shows how even "peer reviewed" papers can be biased, even when their numbers are accurate - the researchers and editors are looking only to publish papers that confirm their biases, and they won't even bother to look at anything that shows that disproves their biases.

But if any doctors and statisticians want to take this data and submit it to this formerly prestigious journal - data that thoroughly rebuts the first paper - it would be instructive to see whether they are honest enough to publish it.

(If you are wondering, the data for November 10-December 15 shows a 2.5/1000 death rate for UNRWA employees and 3.5/1000 for Hamas figures of Gaza' general population - also a significant difference, but not as striking as the most recent month.)


 
First of all, you're missibg the point of baseness of a human being personal butchery. Vs any war, combat.


Why are you talking about sympathy instead of facts?

Here is more about facts.
Such as Pallywood numbers. Not to mention it is the pAlEsTiNiAns who are using civilians so that Israel looks bad.



The Lancet casualty methodology helps prove that Gaza deaths have been greatly exaggerated over the past month.

In early December, The Lancet published a peer-reviewed study that sought to prove that the Gaza Ministry of Health casualty counts were largely accurate.

Their methodology was to compare the number of deaths per thousand reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health with the number of deaths per thousand of UNRWA employees, which were counted independently by UNRWA and not the Hamas ministry.

They found that the two death rates were roughly the same (actually, UNRWA's was higher), indicating that the health ministry was not exaggerating the total number of deaths.

gr1.jpg


The methodology is flawed. It makes an assumption that everyone in Gaza has an equal chance of being killed, meaning that Israel is killing people randomly and indiscriminately. This is not only a false assumption, but an antisemitic one.

Indeed, one reason UNRWA workers could have been killed at a higher rate is because none of them are children - and more than half of them are males of fighting age. About two thirds of the first 101 killed were men, a higher percentage than the percentage of male employees at UNRWA (about 54% across UNRWA, not sure about Gaza itself.) Chances are that at least some of the UNRWA casualties were also legal combatants, either actively participating or acting as "spotters" or other support.

But there's another problem with this. If the Lancet methodology is correct, then it should be correct for every month of the war, not just the first month.

But over the past month, from December 15 to January 15, Hamas claims 5200 people were killed - 2.4 per thousand. But only 15 UNRWA employees were killed in that same timeframe - only 1.1 per thousand! (I'm assuming 13,500 UNRWA employees and 2.2 million total population of Gaza, which seems to be The Lancet's numbers.)

Using the Lancet's own methodology, even assuming the false assumption that UNRWA employees represent the entire population of Gaza rather than only adults and primarily males, the number of deaths claimed by Hamas is over double what their methodology would predict!

That's thousands of false Gaza deaths - using the methodology of this peer-reviewed paper.

Even if we accept that the Gaza health ministry had accurate information for the first month of the war, logic indicates that as Gaza infrastructure has deteriorated, the reliability of their figures has gone down as well. As we showed earlier, even the UN no longer parrots the Hamas claims that 70% of the deaths are women and children. There is no reason to believe the ministry of health figures over the past two months given that we know their "70% women and children" number is pure propaganda.

Which strongly indicates that Hamas is mandating how many deaths to claim, and the relationship with reality is increasingly tenuous as the war goes on and as Hamas sees its figures accepted as truth worldwide.

Beyond that, would the Lancet even consider publishing a paper using the exact same methodology for the time period of December 15-January 15 as I've shown here? I highly doubt it. Which shows how even "peer reviewed" papers can be biased, even when their numbers are accurate - the researchers and editors are looking only to publish papers that confirm their biases, and they won't even bother to look at anything that shows that disproves their biases.

But if any doctors and statisticians want to take this data and submit it to this formerly prestigious journal - data that thoroughly rebuts the first paper - it would be instructive to see whether they are honest enough to publish it.

(If you are wondering, the data for November 10-December 15 shows a 2.5/1000 death rate for UNRWA employees and 3.5/1000 for Hamas figures of Gaza' general population - also a significant difference, but not as striking as the most recent month.)


I consider that to be Zionist/US propaganda. There's just no way of escaping it in the West on account of no allternative news is permitted.

I'll trust the opinions of the people of the whole world.
 
Because it is "not " jihadi regime that PROPAGATES..Or its mouthpiece al jihadzeera... Hamas on Al Jazeera denies the Holocaust

Since when is CNN not biased against Israel?



FYI

The Z word you mentioned is about returning to a historic homeland.
And some Americans are totally convinced that 911 wasn't a revenge attack too.

Indicating that everybody needs to be careful on what they say they believe.
 
Hysterically funny , our little Trilly Troll OP

The combination of Trilly and CNN is like being offered tea from Dear Uncle Adolf and Joseph Goebbels .

Neither being welcome guests or in the least bit trustworthy

Come on Trilly , you must ask for better material and not Fake News for kids .
 
Forum outcast infamous RACIST motivated posting:
'Luiza' - Nazism:

(luiza.86585)

  • Pro Jihad child killing.
  • Admitting Jews today are the same ethnicity as Jesus . But often tries to lie about it.
  • Advocates for genocide.
  • Pro Jihad entities use of its children.
  • Promoting Hitler garbage.
  • Spamming the forums with despicable wording.


Gas chambers or Ovens - Nazi Luiza asks?



Exterminating J.


image upload


Against all Jews.



And more...




Today's Jews are as Jesus ethnicity she admits. But racist Luiza still hates via ancient lies canards stereotypes.

 
Forum outcast infamous RACIST motivated posting:
'Luiza' - Nazism:

(luiza.86585)

  • Pro Jihad child killing.
  • Admitting Jews today are the same ethnicity as Jesus . But often tries to lie about it.
  • Advocates for genocide.
  • Pro Jihad entities use of its children.
  • Promoting Hitler garbage.
  • Spamming the forums with despicable wording.


Gas chambers or Ovens - Nazi Luiza asks?



Exterminating J.


image upload


Against all Jews.



And more...




Today's Jews are as Jesus ethnicity she admits. But racist Luiza still hates via ancient lies canards stereotypes.

Also, keep in mind that the trash LUIZA has been posting the words: "go iran" as it bombed:

Syria.

Pakistan.

Iraq.
 
And some Americans are totally convinced that 911 wasn't a revenge attack too.

Indicating that everybody needs to be careful on what they say they believe.

In other news

 
What is it with the zionists that they consider themselves better than all others? Why do they think that 'they alone can get away with genocide in front of the eyes of the world?
 
Forum outcast infamous RACIST motivated posting:
'Luiza' - Nazism:

(luiza.86585)

  • Pro Jihad child killing.
  • Admitting Jews today are the same ethnicity as Jesus . But often tries to lie about it.
  • Advocates for genocide.
  • Pro Jihad entities use of its children.
  • Promoting Hitler garbage.
  • Spamming the forums with despicable wording.



Gas chambers or Ovens - Nazi Luiza asks?



Exterminating J.




Against all Jews.



And more...




Today's Jews are as Jesus ethnicity she admits. But racist Luiza still hates via ancient lies canards stereotypes.

 

Hysterically funny , our little Trilly Troll OP

The combination of Trilly and CNN is like being offered tea from Dear Uncle Adolf and Joseph Goebbels .

Neither being welcome guests or in the least bit trustworthy

Come on Trilly , you must ask for better material and not Fake News for kids .
 
What is it with the zionists
Every culture thinks its better than others. If course it's only the Arab side that is interested in dead kids.
It's called Dead Vaby Strategy






___________




Hamas terrorists had ‘a thing with sexual organs’ and targeted genitalia of Israeli victims: UN testimony


By Yaron Steinbuch
Published Dec. 5, 2023, 11:50 a.m. ET




Oct 7: sexual violence


Misc.:




img-20231117-wa0007-1-jpg.869451





__


 
First of all, you're missing the point of baseness of a human being personal butchery. Vs any war, combat. Unless you're ISIS or pAlEsTiNiAn.

Why are you talking about sympathy instead of facts?

Here is more about facts.
Such as Pallywood numbers. Not to mention it is the pAlEsTiNiAns who are using civilians so that Israel looks bad.



The Lancet casualty methodology helps prove that Gaza deaths have been greatly exaggerated over the past month.

In early December, The Lancet published a peer-reviewed study that sought to prove that the Gaza Ministry of Health casualty counts were largely accurate.

Their methodology was to compare the number of deaths per thousand reported by the Gaza Ministry of Health with the number of deaths per thousand of UNRWA employees, which were counted independently by UNRWA and not the Hamas ministry.

They found that the two death rates were roughly the same (actually, UNRWA's was higher), indicating that the health ministry was not exaggerating the total number of deaths.

gr1.jpg


The methodology is flawed. It makes an assumption that everyone in Gaza has an equal chance of being killed, meaning that Israel is killing people randomly and indiscriminately. This is not only a false assumption, but an antisemitic one.

Indeed, one reason UNRWA workers could have been killed at a higher rate is because none of them are children - and more than half of them are males of fighting age. About two thirds of the first 101 killed were men, a higher percentage than the percentage of male employees at UNRWA (about 54% across UNRWA, not sure about Gaza itself.) Chances are that at least some of the UNRWA casualties were also legal combatants, either actively participating or acting as "spotters" or other support.

But there's another problem with this. If the Lancet methodology is correct, then it should be correct for every month of the war, not just the first month.

But over the past month, from December 15 to January 15, Hamas claims 5200 people were killed - 2.4 per thousand. But only 15 UNRWA employees were killed in that same timeframe - only 1.1 per thousand! (I'm assuming 13,500 UNRWA employees and 2.2 million total population of Gaza, which seems to be The Lancet's numbers.)

Using the Lancet's own methodology, even assuming the false assumption that UNRWA employees represent the entire population of Gaza rather than only adults and primarily males, the number of deaths claimed by Hamas is over double what their methodology would predict!

That's thousands of false Gaza deaths - using the methodology of this peer-reviewed paper.

Even if we accept that the Gaza health ministry had accurate information for the first month of the war, logic indicates that as Gaza infrastructure has deteriorated, the reliability of their figures has gone down as well. As we showed earlier, even the UN no longer parrots the Hamas claims that 70% of the deaths are women and children. There is no reason to believe the ministry of health figures over the past two months given that we know their "70% women and children" number is pure propaganda.

Which strongly indicates that Hamas is mandating how many deaths to claim, and the relationship with reality is increasingly tenuous as the war goes on and as Hamas sees its figures accepted as truth worldwide.

Beyond that, would the Lancet even consider publishing a paper using the exact same methodology for the time period of December 15-January 15 as I've shown here? I highly doubt it. Which shows how even "peer reviewed" papers can be biased, even when their numbers are accurate - the researchers and editors are looking only to publish papers that confirm their biases, and they won't even bother to look at anything that shows that disproves their biases.

But if any doctors and statisticians want to take this data and submit it to this formerly prestigious journal - data that thoroughly rebuts the first paper - it would be instructive to see whether they are honest enough to publish it.

(If you are wondering, the data for November 10-December 15 shows a 2.5/1000 death rate for UNRWA employees and 3.5/1000 for Hamas figures of Gaza' general population - also a significant difference, but not as striking as the most recent month.)


Indeed
 
Marina Medvin:

Israeli witness recounts seeing Palestinian civilians laugh as they raped a woman who they pulled out of a car. They then slaughtered her with a knife and continued to rape the dead body, laughing. These civilians then went on to find a couple running away and they butchered the couple with axes and knives. Palestinian civilians came prepared to butcher and torture Jews on October 7 — prepared with axes and knives.
Jan 5, 2024
 
We are all ignoring the Fake News from the silly Trilly Trolls
Go away silly boys and start to grow up

Good to see the Freedom Fighting groups giving the Nazi Israelis such a good spanking
 
It's again a question of which is the most egregious crime that will elicit sympathy for the victims?
Chopping them into little pieces or blowing them into little pieces with Zionist/US bombs from 30,000 feet?

I mean, dead is dead!

Somebody should ask one of the children who has no legs and no eyes.
Meh, unimpressive. Failed argument often repeated by terrorism justifiers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top