Climate change prediction facts

[BluesLegend]

Why do Climate Scientists spend 99% of their time trying to prove what can't be proved? In the meantime, they all but ignore the solid waste pollution that is turning our Oceans into a liquid landfill? In another 20 years you won't be able to drive a boat 100 yards without bumping into a plastic carton or a dead fish.

Liberals spill hundreds of millions of gallons of untreated raw sewage into public waterways each year from their inner cities and its total crickets on that.

 

[BluesLegend]

Typical of the radical left that they would use "events" that happen naturally as political tools. I wonder if they included the 100 year eclipse of the sun in their "events" list? Around the turn of the 20th century Galveston Texas was obliterated by a hurricane. Was the freaking ice age an "event" ? Everything is political to the left and you almost gotta laugh that the democrat mayor of the murder capital of the U.S., Chicago, once coined the phrase "never let a crisis go to waste".

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
Rahm Emanuel

Suspicious...that the left's solution to climate change is tax increases

 

[Weatherman2020]

Save the Polar Bears!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Typical of the radical left that they would use "events" that happen naturally as political tools. I wonder if they included the 100 year eclipse of the sun in their "events" list? Around the turn of the 20th century Galveston Texas was obliterated by a hurricane. Was the freaking ice age an "event" ? Everything is political to the left and you almost gotta laugh that the democrat mayor of the murder capital of the U.S., Chicago, once coined the phrase "never let a crisis go to waste".

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
Rahm Emanuel

Suspicious...that the left's solution to climate change is tax increases

And funny how the taxes should be spent upon themselves.

 

[wihosa]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

No one can rebut your unnamed source, ever!

 

[Darkwind]

Ok I'll try to make it simpler for you. The science predicts increases in extreme weather events which may include tornados and hurricanes but is not limited to those. It could be other things like droughts, wild fires, crop freeze damage, etc.

As predicted these extreme weather events have increased in occurrence (there's more of them!).

Good thing or bad?

You honestly don't see it, do you?

When you have to include 'EVERYTHING' in order to make your predictions seem right, you're not. What you are doing is making it possible to say that climate change is responsible for ANYTHING you want to say it is responsible for.

That is not science. That is just poorly veiled politics.

 

[Rustic]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

 

[Rustic]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

You sound like a pss ant...

 

[Theowl32]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

Good, now you can answer a few of my little annoying questions that will piss you off.

Where does it say man is absolutely causing any climate change?

How about ALL of the predictions that have been absurdly wrong?

Why don't you tell all of us all of the things you are doing for the planet other than pushing the globalist propaganda?

Do you think by hating white republican American capitalists well enough is doing enough for the planet?

Do you truly believe retweeting Greenpeace messages reduces greenhouse gases?

What specifically was the Paris Accord suppose to do since so many of the biggest polluters in the world were not committing to it?

Do liberals want to go back to stone age technology since most metals we use rely on burning of fossil fuels? Like steel comes from icky coal.

Why are so many left wingers living along the ocean around the world, since they believe the sea levels are rising at such a fast rate?

Have you had enough of me using questions to illustrate your hypocrisy?

 

[Pete7469]

Way to ignore the facts. Even when put in terms that might mean something to those who think every facet of life should be monetized , dollars that is, you still want to deny.

Never mind, just put your head back in the sand.

Better than where you keep yours.

 

[Pete7469]

The problem is overpopulation.

The solution: WAR

No it isn't.

I posted the solution years ago. It just proves libturds are not willing to put forth the effort themselves. They believe stealing from the rich solves every crisis they invent.

The solution is simple.

Next earth day in 2018, everyone who believes the human production of CO2 is warming the planet should cut their carbon footprint in half for the day by taping a plastic bag over their heads for 12 hours.

I guarantee that the next day the world will be a cooler place, and the collective intelligence of humanity will double.

That would be real progress.

 

[Pete7469]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

There are no "rebuttals" of a bullshit comedy show.

You're being heckled because you're not even funny. Just pathetic.

 

[wihosa]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

No one can rebut your unnamed source, ever!

My source is NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). I said that in the OP. Did you go to their site? They have a list of every extreme weather event since 1980 when they began compiling the data. It tells what, where, when the event was as well as the cost in dollars (minimum $1Billion).

 

[wihosa]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

Good, now you can answer a few of my little annoying questions that will piss you off.

Where does it say man is absolutely causing any climate change?

How about ALL of the predictions that have been absurdly wrong?

Why don't you tell all of us all of the things you are doing for the planet other than pushing the globalist propaganda?

Do you think by hating white republican American capitalists well enough is doing enough for the planet?

Do you truly believe retweeting Greenpeace messages reduces greenhouse gases?

What specifically was the Paris Accord suppose to do since so many of the biggest polluters in the world were not committing to it?

Do liberals want to go back to stone age technology since most metals we use rely on burning of fossil fuels? Like steel comes from icky coal.

Why are so many left wingers living along the ocean around the world, since they believe the sea levels are rising at such a fast rate?

Have you had enough of me using questions to illustrate your hypocrisy?

All straw man arguments. Show me a quote of anytime I've ever said any of the things your conived questions imply.

 

[Richard-H]

NOAA posted a list of the five “lowest non-overlapping 12 month counts on record from 1954-present.” Notably, each of these low-tornado periods occur since 1986, precisely during the time period global warming alarmists claim global warming is causing more extreme weather events such as tornadoes.

197 tornadoes – starting in May 2012

247 tornadoes – starting in June 1991

270 tornadoes – starting in November 1986

289 tornadoes – starting in December 2001

298 tornadoes – starting in June 2000

__________________________________

12 years - over 4,000 days - without a hurricane hitting the US until Harvey. This easily smashes the prior record of less than 2,300 days between major hurricane strikes.

Try checking those dates again. Hurricane Sandy hit in 2012.

 

[Weatherman2020]

NOAA posted a list of the five “lowest non-overlapping 12 month counts on record from 1954-present.” Notably, each of these low-tornado periods occur since 1986, precisely during the time period global warming alarmists claim global warming is causing more extreme weather events such as tornadoes.

197 tornadoes – starting in May 2012

247 tornadoes – starting in June 1991

270 tornadoes – starting in November 1986

289 tornadoes – starting in December 2001

298 tornadoes – starting in June 2000

__________________________________

12 years - over 4,000 days - without a hurricane hitting the US until Harvey. This easily smashes the prior record of less than 2,300 days between major hurricane strikes.

Try checking those dates again. Hurricane Sandy hit in 2012.

Cat 1. Not a major hurricane.

 

[wihosa]

Ok I'll try to make it simpler for you. The science predicts increases in extreme weather events which may include tornados and hurricanes but is not limited to those. It could be other things like droughts, wild fires, crop freeze damage, etc.

As predicted these extreme weather events have increased in occurrence (there's more of them!).

Good thing or bad?

You honestly don't see it, do you?

When you have to include 'EVERYTHING' in order to make your predictions seem right, you're not. What you are doing is making it possible to say that climate change is responsible for ANYTHING you want to say it is responsible for.

That is not science. That is just poorly veiled politics.

This is what the science predicted, more extreme weather events. Not just more hurricanes. And that is what is happening, or due you dispute the data? If you do, be sure to include a rational bases for doing so. Simply denying the data is not an argument.

 

[wihosa]

By the way the climate change predictions also say the the extreme weather events in some cases will exceed past events in destructiveness. Harvey produced the greatest rainfall from a single storm in history and Irma has now by classified as strong a hurricane as any before.

 

[wihosa]

Not a single rebuttal on point. No I'm not surprised. Not a single reply to the fact that extreme weather events, which have always happened are now happening at triple the rate they were just a few decades ago.

Don't forget Trump's Chumps, extreme weather events are those that cause a minimum of $1Billion dollars in damages. That's a bad thing, not ok even though it's happened before.

Apparently, Trumps Chumps don't know that more of a bad thing is bad.

Can it be stated any more plainly, simply? Not for Trumps Chumps.

There are no "rebuttals" of a bullshit comedy show.

You're being heckled because you're not even funny. Just pathetic.

You're heckling 'cause you got nothin'