Climate change prediction facts

[wihosa]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Climate "Science" is a joke. It's the only "Science" where the practitioners try to kill off the skeptics and jump up and down like monkeys and say they have "Consensus"

Riddle me this, EnviroMarxists, why didn't we have a similar hurricane season in the Atlantic in the last 15 years? Was the extra 2PPM CO2 the deciding factor?

 

[wihosa]

Way to ignore the facts. Even when put in terms that might mean something to those who think every facet of life should be monetized , dollars that is, you still want to deny.

Never mind, just put your head back in the sand.

 

[washamericom]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

no weather in space. a brave thread none the less.

 

[wihosa]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

no weather in space. a brave thread none the less.

No better place to observe global weather than from space.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

Too stupid of an OP to even link to a Soros website.

 

[washamericom]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

no weather in space. a brave thread none the less.

No better place to observe global weather than from space.

how about the eye of a hurricane. if al gore comes out after every weather event, i'm ok with it.
but climate change like socialism is on the American back burner.
the earth has always had bad weather, it always will, it's part of being born here.

 

[tinydancer]

5 ice ages. Guess what happened in between. You bettcha! Climate change.

 

[Weatherman2020]

NOAA posted a list of the five “lowest non-overlapping 12 month counts on record from 1954-present.” Notably, each of these low-tornado periods occur since 1986, precisely during the time period global warming alarmists claim global warming is causing more extreme weather events such as tornadoes.

197 tornadoes – starting in May 2012

247 tornadoes – starting in June 1991

270 tornadoes – starting in November 1986

289 tornadoes – starting in December 2001

298 tornadoes – starting in June 2000

__________________________________

12 years - over 4,000 days - without a hurricane hitting the US until Harvey. This easily smashes the prior record of less than 2,300 days between major hurricane strikes.

 

[wihosa]

Ok I'll try to make it simpler for you. The science predicts increases in extreme weather events which may include tornados and hurricanes but is not limited to those. It could be other things like droughts, wild fires, crop freeze damage, etc.

As predicted these extreme weather events have increased in occurrence (there's more of them!).

Good thing or bad?

 

[whitehall]

Typical of the radical left that they would use "events" that happen naturally as political tools. I wonder if they included the 100 year eclipse of the sun in their "events" list? Around the turn of the 20th century Galveston Texas was obliterated by a hurricane. Was the freaking ice age an "event" ? Everything is political to the left and you almost gotta laugh that the democrat mayor of the murder capital of the U.S., Chicago, once coined the phrase "never let a crisis go to waste".

 

[BluesLegend]

12 years - over 4,000 days - without a hurricane hitting the US until Harvey. This easily smashes the prior record of less than 2,300 days between major hurricane strikes.

Was that why this fool conveniently left off the past 7 years of data? This thread gets a rating typical of warmers and their fake science agenda.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Ok I'll try to make it simpler for you. The science predicts increases in extreme weather events which may include tornados and hurricanes but is not limited to those. It could be other things like droughts, wild fires, crop freeze damage, etc.

As predicted these extreme weather events have increased in occurrence (there's more of them!).

Good thing or bad?

Droughts have come and gone forever. And everyone in one thinks it's the worst one ever, it isn't. Wild fires have always happened. You tree nuts stopped logging and forest clean up so nature is doing what it always has to clear out the dead and undergrowth. Crops have been freezing here and there ever since the first seed was planted by man. It's nature dipshit. You aren't going to change it no matter how much you collect in taxes.

 

[MarathonMike]

Why do Climate Scientists spend 99% of their time trying to prove what can't be proved? In the meantime, they all but ignore the solid waste pollution that is turning our Oceans into a liquid landfill? In another 20 years you won't be able to drive a boat 100 yards without bumping into a plastic carton or a dead fish.

 

[fncceo]

Prediction is a science...

 

[imawhosure]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

Give it up, lol. It has been proven your theory is wetter than Houston right now. It is all phony-baloney, and we all know it, including you; and if you do not, you are dumber than a box of rocks!

 

[Zander]

What we have is a case of "delayed onset Globull Warming and climate change ice age impending doom GAIA storm hurricane terrrorism" - or DOGWACCIAIDGSHT for short. (pronounced "Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit")

Here is how it works:

When a Democrat is in office, no "Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit"
When it's a Republican, "Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit" comes back with righteous indignation!!
D = pause in "Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit"
R = acceleration in "Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit"​

It's natures way of telling us we should have elected hiLIARy...."Dog-Wacca-Dog-Shit"

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The problem is overpopulation.

The solution: WAR

 

[Norman]

The climate is changing as predicted by climate scientists. Their prediction is proved right by the statistics. No scientist can say for sure that any particular weather event is directly caused by global warming, but what has been predicted is that extreme weather events will increase in number. What is an extreme weather event? It could be any of the following; hurricane, tornado, flood, extraordinary heat and or wild fires, extraordinary cold, snowfall/crop freeze event. The inclusive requirement being at least $1billion in property damages (in inflation adjusted $).

So has there been an increase?

Let's go to the numbers. Following are the average number of extreme weather events by decade since 1980 when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (a division of NASA ) began compiling the data.
1980's - 2.7 events per year
1990's - 4.9 events per year
2000's - 5.4 events per year
2010's - 10.3 events per year

We are now experiencing extreme weather events of at least $1 billion dollar in property damage at triple the rate we were in the 1980's. Science deniers will of course deny this information, because that is what they do...

To make it worse, Trump just nominated a science denying politician to head up NASA. Rep.Jim Bridenstine R. Oklahoma, who has no science background (first nominee ever without a science background) to head NASA. Already there is bipartisan push back. The Senate should reject this nominee. We must have someone leading who understands the scientific method and believes what the science shows.

Science makes predictions all the time that turn out to be true, for instance my wife and I just made a 1100 mile journey to a place predicted by science to be an optimal viewing location for the solar eclipse. We were there on the appointed day at the exact predicted time and low and behold the eclipse was exactly as predicted! Science works! Even on climate science!

The fact is, the predictions didn't get any facts even close to the proximity of being right.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Typical of the radical left that they would use "events" that happen naturally as political tools. I wonder if they included the 100 year eclipse of the sun in their "events" list? Around the turn of the 20th century Galveston Texas was obliterated by a hurricane. Was the freaking ice age an "event" ? Everything is political to the left and you almost gotta laugh that the democrat mayor of the murder capital of the U.S., Chicago, once coined the phrase "never let a crisis go to waste".

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
Rahm Emanuel