Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Ol' buddy boy Walleyes, when you have the scientific credibility of Mann, Hansen, or Alley, get back to us. Until then, you are just another anonymous poster on the internet, one that has been shown to consistently lie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They wouldn't have any reason to believe either one of us, since neither of us is a scientist.Someone should tell them that the whole climate gate scandal has already been determined to be false, manufactured, contrived, made up BS.Thank you for another vague, unsubstantiated, knee jerk, generic pronouncement.Oh I see......because market forces prove science. Why didn't I think of that?
CLIMATEGATE showed the WORLD that the AGW alarmism was a fraud. The world reacted accordingly.
Unsubstantiated? What, you don't know how to read either? Wow, look at these closures. Must suck to be you.
London banks quit carbon trading
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cbb749ba-506b-11e3-9f0d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3cE0B80Ym
Carbon desk closures
There is increasing scepticism from within the market that carbon holds any trading future. Follow the latest carbon desk closures here.
Carbon desk closures FERN
Lehman Brothers shuts carbon trading desk
Lehman Brothers shuts carbon trading desk Reuters
Yes, there were LOADS of you drones telling them that. THEY didn't believe you!
His claims go way beyond straining credulity. And you don't have to be expert at anything to know that.Liminal, Walleyes claims to be a Phd Geologist. Something I find extremely hard to believe. And I do have a basis for that, as I am a student, taking classes at a University, towards a degree in Geology. My mentors are both Phd Geologists, as is my advisor. I have not found his posts to be credible, or his arguements presented with the rigor that I have come to expect from people with those credentials.
And still no debunkness in the threadLiminal, Walleyes claims to be a Phd Geologist. Something I find extremely hard to believe. And I do have a basis for that, as I am a student, taking classes at a University, towards a degree in Geology. My mentors are both Phd Geologists, as is my advisor. I have not found his posts to be credible, or his arguements presented with the rigor that I have come to expect from people with those credentials.
Because you're too lazy to read links or watch videos.And still no debunkness in the threadLiminal, Walleyes claims to be a Phd Geologist. Something I find extremely hard to believe. And I do have a basis for that, as I am a student, taking classes at a University, towards a degree in Geology. My mentors are both Phd Geologists, as is my advisor. I have not found his posts to be credible, or his arguements presented with the rigor that I have come to expect from people with those credentials.
No, your wrong, just like all the deniers are all the time. What's happened here is that the deniers have failed to debunk the debunkers.24 pages and the OP still fails to debunk anything.
And still no debunkness in the threadLiminal, Walleyes claims to be a Phd Geologist. Something I find extremely hard to believe. And I do have a basis for that, as I am a student, taking classes at a University, towards a degree in Geology. My mentors are both Phd Geologists, as is my advisor. I have not found his posts to be credible, or his arguements presented with the rigor that I have come to expect from people with those credentials.
Is that what they use to tell you eh?No, your wrong, just like all the deniers are all the time. What's happened here is that the deniers have failed to debunk the debunkers.24 pages and the OP still fails to debunk anything.
Spoken like a 12 year old failure.
How the fuck would you know who has expertise if you are so ignorant regarding the subject?I don't understand the science any better than you do, so I rely on people with actual expertise.Why are people like you, who are admittedly ignorant regarding the subject of climate change, influenced so easily by strawman arguments?
Please explain.
Myself, I am an expert.
Maybe some climate change deniers are simply ignorant and misguided......they might not all be completely dishonest.
And if his predictions weren't 300% off with more CO2 than even he could have imagined his opinion might matter. However, he abandoned science for political activism long ago. He is no longer credible.
Uh huh
And, again, where is that cooling trend that you have been promising us?
How the fuck would you know who has expertise if you are so ignorant regarding the subject?I don't understand the science any better than you do, so I rely on people with actual expertise.
Myself, I am an expert.
Maybe some climate change deniers are simply ignorant and misguided......they might not all be completely dishonest.
And if his predictions weren't 300% off with more CO2 than even he could have imagined his opinion might matter. However, he abandoned science for political activism long ago. He is no longer credible.
Uh huh
What an ignorant fool... You disparage Willie Soon but its OK for your side to take 53 million dollars and not declare from whence it came... And you have been shown that it was the SMITHSONIAN who entered into the contract and demanded that the donors identity not be reveled , not Dr Soon. So your post is nothing more than deception and lies.. Go figure.. Your a liar and a deceiver...
You have proven you have no credibility or ethics....
Nothing your limited mentality could grasp anyway.And still no debunkness in the threadLiminal, Walleyes claims to be a Phd Geologist. Something I find extremely hard to believe. And I do have a basis for that, as I am a student, taking classes at a University, towards a degree in Geology. My mentors are both Phd Geologists, as is my advisor. I have not found his posts to be credible, or his arguements presented with the rigor that I have come to expect from people with those credentials.
Spoken like another nobody with nothing to say.No, your wrong, just like all the deniers are all the time. What's happened here is that the deniers have failed to debunk the debunkers.24 pages and the OP still fails to debunk anything.
Spoken like a 12 year old failure.
34 pages and not a single post showing what the title states! Now that's funny. FAIL
Maybe some climate change deniers are simply ignorant and misguided......they might not all be completely dishonest.How the fuck would you know who has expertise if you are so ignorant regarding the subject?
Myself, I am an expert.
And if his predictions weren't 300% off with more CO2 than even he could have imagined his opinion might matter. However, he abandoned science for political activism long ago. He is no longer credible.
Uh huh
What an ignorant fool... You disparage Willie Soon but its OK for your side to take 53 million dollars and not declare from whence it came... And you have been shown that it was the SMITHSONIAN who entered into the contract and demanded that the donors identity not be reveled , not Dr Soon. So your post is nothing more than deception and lies.. Go figure.. Your a liar and a deceiver...
You have proven you have no credibility or ethics....
You have proven that you have nothing. End of story.
So now we've gone from the ground to the lower troposphere and in your chart all the way up to the STRATOSPHERE!!!!!View attachment 42224And, again, where is that cooling trend that you have been promising us?
Its been going on for some time.. When we remove the infilling by NOAA and GISS we find what is really occurring..