Christians look to form new nation in U.S.

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by -=d=-
Christian's 'cannot' believe there is any other way to God than thru Christ. For Christians to believe as you and others would have, their faith is worthless, because Christ would be a Liar.

:-/

Sucks. But Truth.

Don't believe I said that they have to believe in other things, just to realize that not everybody will believe as they do.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by dilloduck
Great----We have a chance then !! Cheer up !

:

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by Pale Rider
I for one am sick and tired of all the moral decay, that started with slick willie getting a blow job in the Oval Office. That was an accelerant.

I hope that this moral decay is stopped, and even backed up. Why does America's metamorphosis have to be morally corrupt and perverted in direction?

moral decay was hardly started by a blowjob in the oval office. Its something that has, and always will, exist.

 

[insein]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
Don't believe I said that they have to believe in other things, just to realize that not everybody will believe as they do.

I think most religions understand that. Only the extremists use radical methods to force you to obey their religion. But what religion is run by extremists?

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
moral decay was hardly started by a blowjob in the oval office. Its something that has, and always will, exist.

Cool!

Can I be president then?

What other "perks" do we get?

:

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by insein
I think most religions understand that. Only the extremists use radical methods to force you to obey their religion. But what religion is run by extremists?

catholicism at times, christianity at others, islam quite a bit but looks like more because of the media. what about buddhism, you hardly ever hear a a radical buddhist. :

 

[insein]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
catholicism at times, christianity at others, islam quite a bit but looks like more because of the media. what about buddhism, you hardly ever hear a a radical buddhist. :

Catholicism during the Roman Catholic Church days.

Some forms of Christianity like in England under Henry the 8th.

Islam seems to have always been this way. Not just because of the media, but because of history. You see that most of the Islamic nations in the middle East are there through violent rebellions and forced religous practice upon the populace with the option "join us or die." Even now the terrorists go about blowing up infidels and infidel supporters to further their extremist vision while the supposed "Leaders" of islam fail to do anything about it. So who is running the show in that religion?

 

[5stringJeff]

Originally posted by DKSuddeth
catholicism at times, christianity at others, islam quite a bit but looks like more because of the media. what about buddhism, you hardly ever hear a a radical buddhist. :

Not true at all. Many hard-line Buddhists in Sri Lanka have been busy exterminating the local Christian population for years. But Christian persecution rarely makes the news, so you don't hear about it.

 

[dilloduck]

When the Buddhists kill Christians do they say " we are more than happy to help you meet your maker" ?

 

[5stringJeff]

Don't know. But I can't see how it would be good karma for Buddhists to kill people.

 

[DKSuddeth]

Originally posted by gop_jeff
Not true at all. Many hard-line Buddhists in Sri Lanka have been busy exterminating the local Christian population for years. But Christian persecution rarely makes the news, so you don't hear about it.

so in actuality, this you hardly ever hear a a radical buddhist. really is true. not that there aren't any.

 

[dilloduck]

We sure heard about em when the libs wanted us too. Remember them buggers flaming in the streets of Saigon? Now THATS radical !!

 

[Zhukov]

Burnell is leading the charge for a peaceful secession of one state from the union

What good does it do to run from the problem?

Point to anyone on this entire board but me who can show in the Constitution where there are mechanical processes for amending and showing the supreme court lower level than the Constitution its self with no recourse other than impeachment when a judge or lawmaker misbehaves.

Article. I.

Section. 2.

Clause 5: The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Section. 3.

Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments

Article. II.

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article. III.

Section. 2.

Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Article. VI.

Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

 

[NewGuy]

Zhukov, I commend you.

 

[dilloduck]

There are issues brought before the Supreme Court that are not addressed specifically in the constitution. The PEOPLE on the Supreme Court decide which cases they determine merit a ruling. The people on the Supreme Court then each make thier own OPINIONS and vote aye or nay. The will of the Constitution is by de facto decided by mere mortals, approved of by mere mortals, nominated by mere mortals who were elected by mere mortals. Can't really expect a RIGHT decision. Can we expect a constituional one? If the supreme court screws up---which one gets impeached first?

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by dilloduck
There are issues brought before the Supreme Court that are not addressed specifically in the constitution. The PEOPLE on the Supreme Court decide which cases they determine merit a ruling. The people on the Supreme Court then each make thier own OPINIONS and vote aye or nay. The will of the Constitution is by de facto decided by mere mortals, approved of by mere mortals, nominated by mere mortals who were elected by mere mortals. Can't really expect a RIGHT decision. Can we expect a constituional one? If the supreme court screws up---which one gets impeached first?

If you can't tell that a law is contrary to our Constitution, you REALLY need help.

A supreme court isn't going to help at all.

If they are a collective to do this, you impeach 'em all.

 

[dilloduck]

The Supreme Court can't tell. They allow unconstitional laws to stand. No one impeaches them. Then its still the law we have to go by. Why is the Supreme Court not going help any!---Don't understand you here.

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by dilloduck
The Supreme Court can't tell.

Yes they can. They like power, though.

They allow unconstitional laws to stand. No one impeaches them.

Because we have corruption in congress too. Only Congress can impeach them.

Then its still the law we have to go by.

The Constitution is the highest law in the land, and it says otherwise. We are told not to follow it.

Why is the Supreme Court not going help any!---Don't understand you here.

More corruption=more money and power for them.

It is against their best interest to be honest. The people need education and guns.

Both are virtually non-existant now.

 

[dilloduck]

Who is going to teach people what is the right way?

 

[NewGuy]

Originally posted by dilloduck
Who is going to teach people what is the right way?

Why are you even concerned?