Chicago woman spits in Eric Trump's face

If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.

Why would you say that Confounding?

Last time Ted Nugent was caught even calling Obama a "Mongrel"
he got earfuls of criticism from fellow Conservatives who compelled him
to issue a public correction. Nugent even admitted those criticisms came from
better men than himself. He agreed to stick to the principles instead of namecalling.

I'm sorry to see the political culture change so much
that people cannot be civil. But you even expect people to applaud
appalling behavior. Very sad, I hope this phase passes soon.

I'd like to see us get past this, and back to working
together in teams solving problems effectively.
When did congress ever work together for the good of our nation in the last forty years? To include the other two branches

^ Moonglow
Actually in 1980 Congress unanimously passed the Code of Ethics for Govt Service
Public Law 96-303
www.ethics-commission.net

I believe this is written as well as the Bill of Rights.
If it currently only applies to federal govt officials, should we
pass a Constitutional Amendment expanding it to ALL levels?

---

CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

House Concurrent Resolution No. 175, July 11, 1958, 72 Stat. B12, provided for a Code of Ethics for all Government employees, including officeholders. See Public Law 96-303, set out below.

DISPLAY IN FEDERAL BUILDINGS OF CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

Public Law 96-303, July 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 855, provided: "That, under such regulations as the Administrator shall prescribe, each agency shall display in appropriate areas of Federal buildings copies of the Code of Ethics for Government Service.
"Section 2 (a) The Administrator shall provide for the publication of copies of such Code of Ethics and for their distribution to agencies for use under the first section of this Act.
"(b) The Administrator may accept on behalf of the United States any unconditional gift made for the purposes of this Act.
"Section 3. For purposes of this Act -
"(1) the term 'agency' means an Executive agency (as defined by Section 105 of Title 5, United States Code), the United States Postal Service, and the Postal Rate Commission;
"(2) the term 'Administrator' means the Administrator of the General Services Administration;
"(3) the Code of Ethics for Government Service shall read as follows -

gov-logo.jpg


"CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

"Any person in Government service should:

"I. Put loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or Government department.

"II. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.

"III. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving earnest effort and best thought to the performance of duties.

"IV. Seek to find and employ more efficient and economical ways of getting tasks accomplished.

"V. Never discriminate unfairly by the dispensing of special favors or privileges to anyone, whether for remuneration or not; and never accept, for himself or herself or for family members, favors or benefits under circumstances which might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of governmental duties.

"VI. Make no private promises of any kind binding upon the duties of office, since a Governmental employee has no private word which can be binding on public duty.

"VII. Engage in no business with the Government, either directly or indirectly, which is inconsistent with the conscientious performance of governmental duties.

"VIII. Never use any information gained confidentially in the performance of governmental duties as a means of making a private profit.

"IX. Expose corruption wherever discovered.

"X. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.


Your agency ethics official and the Office of Government Ethics are available to answer questions on conflicts of interest; and
"(4) the term 'Federal building' means any building in which at least 20 individuals are regularly employed by an agency as civilian employees.
"Section 4. The provisions of this Act shall take effect October 1, 1980. There shall be no costs imposed on the Federal Government for the printing, framing, or other preparation of the Code of Ethics for Government Service under this Act."
 
If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.

Why would you say that Confounding?

Last time Ted Nugent was caught even calling Obama a "Mongrel"
he got earfuls of criticism from fellow Conservatives who compelled him
to issue a public correction. Nugent even admitted those criticisms came from
better men than himself. He agreed to stick to the principles instead of namecalling.

I'm sorry to see the political culture change so much
that people cannot be civil. But you even expect people to applaud
appalling behavior. Very sad, I hope this phase passes soon.

I'd like to see us get past this, and back to working
together in teams solving problems effectively.
When did congress ever work together for the good of our nation in the last forty years? To include the other two branches

^ Moonglow
Actually in 1980 Congress unanimously passed the Code of Ethics for Govt Service
Public Law 96-303
www.ethics-commission.net

I believe this is written as well as the Bill of Rights.
If it currently only applies to federal govt officials, should we
pass a Constitutional Amendment expanding it to ALL levels?

---

CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

House Concurrent Resolution No. 175, July 11, 1958, 72 Stat. B12, provided for a Code of Ethics for all Government employees, including officeholders. See Public Law 96-303, set out below.

DISPLAY IN FEDERAL BUILDINGS OF CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

Public Law 96-303, July 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 855, provided: "That, under such regulations as the Administrator shall prescribe, each agency shall display in appropriate areas of Federal buildings copies of the Code of Ethics for Government Service.
"Section 2 (a) The Administrator shall provide for the publication of copies of such Code of Ethics and for their distribution to agencies for use under the first section of this Act.
"(b) The Administrator may accept on behalf of the United States any unconditional gift made for the purposes of this Act.
"Section 3. For purposes of this Act -
"(1) the term 'agency' means an Executive agency (as defined by Section 105 of Title 5, United States Code), the United States Postal Service, and the Postal Rate Commission;
"(2) the term 'Administrator' means the Administrator of the General Services Administration;
"(3) the Code of Ethics for Government Service shall read as follows -

gov-logo.jpg


"CODE OF ETHICS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICE

"Any person in Government service should:

"I. Put loyalty to the highest moral principles and to country above loyalty to persons, party, or Government department.

"II. Uphold the Constitution, laws, and regulations of the United States and of all governments therein and never be a party to their evasion.

"III. Give a full day's labor for a full day's pay; giving earnest effort and best thought to the performance of duties.

"IV. Seek to find and employ more efficient and economical ways of getting tasks accomplished.

"V. Never discriminate unfairly by the dispensing of special favors or privileges to anyone, whether for remuneration or not; and never accept, for himself or herself or for family members, favors or benefits under circumstances which might be construed by reasonable persons as influencing the performance of governmental duties.

"VI. Make no private promises of any kind binding upon the duties of office, since a Governmental employee has no private word which can be binding on public duty.

"VII. Engage in no business with the Government, either directly or indirectly, which is inconsistent with the conscientious performance of governmental duties.

"VIII. Never use any information gained confidentially in the performance of governmental duties as a means of making a private profit.

"IX. Expose corruption wherever discovered.

"X. Uphold these principles, ever conscious that public office is a public trust.


Your agency ethics official and the Office of Government Ethics are available to answer questions on conflicts of interest; and
"(4) the term 'Federal building' means any building in which at least 20 individuals are regularly employed by an agency as civilian employees.
"Section 4. The provisions of this Act shall take effect October 1, 1980. There shall be no costs imposed on the Federal Government for the printing, framing, or other preparation of the Code of Ethics for Government Service under this Act."
And it still has not altered the outcome of a government bought by monied interest.
 
If that had been me she spit on I'd be under arrest because I would have decked that bitch.
Sure you would.

You damned right I would. Thank you.
If that had been me she spit on I'd be under arrest because I would have decked that bitch.
Sure you would.

You damned right I would. Thank you.
Good to know. Have a good evening, claudette.
 
If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.
If someone spat on Obama they’d be in custody of SS and it would be a headline in every MSM source.
This one has no MSM coverage yet.
It's all over the news...

spit eric trump - Google Search
Read ‘yet’.
It wasn’t last night.
Had it been an Obama, the hearing would already be dominating headlines.
The story just broke late last night. By this morning, it was all over the news.
 
If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.
not hardly, dude

That is simply unacceptable behavior unless direly provoked, like the target just claimed ones mother was a whore and was a filthy dishonest beoch, etc.

I remember back when 'playing the dozens' was popular among people. Talking shit about someones Mom was often the provocation for fights and other shenanigans.

Calling Obama a Kenyan Muslim Traitor is pretty rough, but far short of spitting in his face, literally.
 
If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.
If someone spat on Obama they’d be in custody of SS and it would be a headline in every MSM source.
This one has no MSM coverage yet.
It's all over the news...

spit eric trump - Google Search
Read ‘yet’.
It wasn’t last night.
Had it been an Obama, the hearing would already be dominating headlines.
The story just broke late last night. By this morning, it was all over the news.
If breitbart had it first, it was avoided by MSM.
 
If somebody spat in Obama's face the right would love it.
If someone spat on Obama they’d be in custody of SS and it would be a headline in every MSM source.
This one has no MSM coverage yet.
It's all over the news...

spit eric trump - Google Search
Read ‘yet’.
It wasn’t last night.
Had it been an Obama, the hearing would already be dominating headlines.
The story just broke late last night. By this morning, it was all over the news.
If breitbart had it first, it was avoided by MSM.
LOL

And by "avoided," you mean covered by most news outlets.
 
If someone spat on Obama they’d be in custody of SS and it would be a headline in every MSM source.
This one has no MSM coverage yet.
It's all over the news...

spit eric trump - Google Search
Read ‘yet’.
It wasn’t last night.
Had it been an Obama, the hearing would already be dominating headlines.
The story just broke late last night. By this morning, it was all over the news.
If breitbart had it first, it was avoided by MSM.
LOL

And by "avoided," you mean covered by most news outlets.
If you think the MSM is not a dem propaganda wing you’re delusional.
They only got around to covering this when they had no choice.
 
Read ‘yet’.
It wasn’t last night.
Had it been an Obama, the hearing would already be dominating headlines.
The story just broke late last night. By this morning, it was all over the news.
If breitbart had it first, it was avoided by MSM.
LOL

And by "avoided," you mean covered by most news outlets.
If you think the MSM is not a dem propaganda wing you’re delusional.
They only got around to covering this when they had no choice.
Aww, you poor thing. You're beyond brain-dead. The MSM covered it shortly after it happened. Same as Fox and other rightwing media. Breitbart being the first to break the story. But no worries, your demented conspiracy nonsense is alive and well.
 
Last edited:
Can you imagine what would have happened, if a woman....or if anybody would have spitted in one of Hussein Obama's daughters?


I can.
 

Forum List

Back
Top