Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Go look at the OP and tell me those are not facts.
now do any of you care to point out how this set of facts proves the cons tag line of Taxes are too high and rasiing them will drag the economy down?
Every economic slump or economic growth is not related just to tax rates or fiscal spending, there are other factors to consider from monetary manipulation of the interest rates in the early 80's to get inflation under control or to create the bubbles of the past several years that are collapsing to an explosion in the population after WWll, people entering the job market, trade agreements, etc.
To credit or blame only one party,one man or a tax rate without discussing the rest is being partisan,being ignorant or being a sheep, something is amiss when so many lips are around one party all the God blessed time or repeating what a talking head says.
I aways talk this way when trying to discuss facts with people who recognise nothing but partisan hackery as their guide
Every economic slump or economic growth is not related just to tax rates or fiscal spending, there are other factors to consider from monetary manipulation of the interest rates in the early 80's to get inflation under control or to create the bubbles of the past several years that are collapsing to an explosion in the population after WWll, people entering the job market, trade agreements, etc.
To credit or blame only one party,one man or a tax rate without discussing the rest is being partisan,being ignorant or being a sheep, something is amiss when so many lips are around one party all the God blessed time or repeating what a talking head says.
Finding patterns in data does not mean you have to ignore other data.
Please go get the data you suggest will show me Im wrong.
I am willing to look at facts unlike the majority on the right here, YOU always seem much more willing to accept fact and I praise you for it.
LOL TM how much do you get paid to spew your crap?
These are cold hard facts dicklick.
What part of these facts do you think are crap?
Facts don't fit in with their "ideology". Remember, these are the same people who believe we "freed" Iraq but are now screaming that "Islam is awful".
Their little heads are like baby rattles with their tiny minds bouncing from one fear to another. With the worst fear having to admit their failed ideology, "failed".
Every economic slump or economic growth is not related just to tax rates or fiscal spending, there are other factors to consider from monetary manipulation of the interest rates in the early 80's to get inflation under control or to create the bubbles of the past several years that are collapsing to an explosion in the population after WWll, people entering the job market, trade agreements, etc.
To credit or blame only one party,one man or a tax rate without discussing the rest is being partisan,being ignorant or being a sheep, something is amiss when so many lips are around one party all the God blessed time or repeating what a talking head says.
I aways talk this way when trying to discuss facts with people who recognise nothing but partisan hackery as their guide
Could be why no-one listens
Dear fucking idiot , the ideas you agreed to with this loser avatar
Go look at the OP and tell me those are not facts.
now do any of you care to point out how this set of facts proves the cons tag line of Taxes are too high and rasiing them will drag the economy down?
Every economic slump or economic growth is not related just to tax rates or fiscal spending, there are other factors to consider from monetary manipulation of the interest rates in the early 80's to get inflation under control or to create the bubbles of the past several years that are collapsing to an explosion in the population after WWll, people entering the job market, trade agreements, etc.
To credit or blame only one party,one man or a tax rate without discussing the rest is being partisan,being ignorant or being a sheep, something is amiss when so many lips are around one party all the God blessed time or repeating what a talking head says.
Finding patterns in data does not mean you have to ignore other data.
Please go get the data you suggest will show me Im wrong.
I am willing to look at facts unlike the majority on the right here, YOU always seem much more willing to accept fact and I praise you for it.
These are cold hard facts dicklick.
What part of these facts do you think are crap?
Facts don't fit in with their "ideology". Remember, these are the same people who believe we "freed" Iraq but are now screaming that "Islam is awful".
Their little heads are like baby rattles with their tiny minds bouncing from one fear to another. With the worst fear having to admit their failed ideology, "failed".
Yeah the gaggle of idiots are here right now and maybe someone with half a brain show up and actually discuss the facts instead of knee jerk insulting what they cant defend against.
Go look at the OP and tell me those are not facts.
now do any of you care to point out how this set of facts proves the cons tag line of Taxes are too high and rasiing them will drag the economy down?
If you look at history without your prism of politics, you will see he is correct.
Make your case with facts
Notice I didnt say he was right
Its not a right/left thing..... you are just plain wrong.
Too much taxes drags the economy down. (Unless you are a sponge and only take.)
Go look at the OP and tell me those are not facts.
now do any of you care to point out how this set of facts proves the cons tag line of Taxes are too high and rasiing them will drag the economy down?
If you look at history without your prism of politics, you will see he is correct.
Make your case with facts
Notice I didnt say he was right
Its not a right/left thing..... you are just plain wrong.
Too much taxes drags the economy down. (Unless you are a sponge and only take.)
Show us how you get to that conclusion
As Reagan once said:
"If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. "
If we tax something, we get less of it. If we subsidize something, we get more of it. Raising the effective tax burden (not the marginal rate, but the end result of how much real money they spend in taxes) lessens the incentive to be productive.
Every economic slump or economic growth is not related just to tax rates or fiscal spending, there are other factors to consider from monetary manipulation of the interest rates in the early 80's to get inflation under control or to create the bubbles of the past several years that are collapsing to an explosion in the population after WWll, people entering the job market, trade agreements, etc.
To credit or blame only one party,one man or a tax rate without discussing the rest is being partisan,being ignorant or being a sheep, something is amiss when so many lips are around one party all the God blessed time or repeating what a talking head says.
Finding patterns in data does not mean you have to ignore other data.
Please go get the data you suggest will show me Im wrong.
I am willing to look at facts unlike the majority on the right here, YOU always seem much more willing to accept fact and I praise you for it.
Thank you, I just started posting here again and have not figured out most posters political stands yet, I wasn't so much as arguing with you as talking in generalities.
After WWll though, there were millions of men coming back from the war, a baby boom took place, most of the world didn't have a manufacturing base, it was destroyed by the war so I would think that would play a huge role in that era, wouldn't you?
the two historic lows were followed by a economic collapse.
The great iconic 50s the right wishes to go back to had a 91% tax rate.
That us why we had great schools and infrastructure
TM,
Have you ever heard of the Money Supply and The Federal Reserve?
And those 91% tax rates in the 1950s were at at income levels above $400,000 - which in 2010 dollars would be over $3,000,000.
THREE MILLION DOLLARS is quite a bit higher than the TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS that Obama has defined as The Rich.
National Taxpayers Union - History of Federal Individual Income Bottom and Top Bracket Rates
this one goes all the way to 2008
the two historic lows were followed by a economic collapse.
The great iconic 50s the right wishes to go back to had a 91% tax rate.
That us why we had great schools and infrastructure
TM,
Have you ever heard of the Money Supply and The Federal Reserve?
And those 91% tax rates in the 1950s were at at income levels above $400,000 - which in 2010 dollars would be over $3,000,000.
THREE MILLION DOLLARS is quite a bit higher than the TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS that Obama has defined as The Rich.
Not to mention the differences in what was deductible and what was considered income....
But what truthdesnotmatter is trying to do is a frequently used left wing, class warfare ploy of misdirection
