Why don't these "ERRORS" ever benefit Republicans? Maybe because they're not "ERRORS"?
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why don't these "ERRORS" ever benefit Republicans? Maybe because they're not "ERRORS"?
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
Why don't these "ERRORS" ever benefit Republicans? Maybe because they're not "ERRORS"?
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
How short your memory is.
E-voting machine swaps Obama vote for Romney taken offline Computerworld
Why don't these "ERRORS" ever benefit Republicans? Maybe because they're not "ERRORS"?
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
How short your memory is.
E-voting machine swaps Obama vote for Romney taken offline Computerworld
Docarooni uses ONE example.. Let's see your examples of Obola winning 120% of the vote.. LOL Come on, you can do it..
Why don't these "ERRORS" ever benefit Republicans? Maybe because they're not "ERRORS"?
Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county Fox News
How short your memory is.
E-voting machine swaps Obama vote for Romney taken offline Computerworld
Docarooni uses ONE example.. Let's see your examples of Obola winning 120% of the vote.. LOL Come on, you can do it..
Well, I can't actually show any "examples" of Obama winning 120% of the vote, cause it never actually happened.
"The actual voting numbers are what you would expect," he said.
Wood County's total on Nov. 6 was 62,338 votes, he said, for a turnout of about 57 percent of registered voters.
Not only is that far below 108 percent -- it's well below the statewide turnout of about 68 percent reported by the secretary of state.
Obama's total in Wood County -- 31,596 votes, or about 51 percent of those cast -- was lower than his 2008 tally, according election night totals from the secretary of state. Mitt Romney received 28,997 votes, or about 47 percent -- less than John McCain's 2008 total.
Says the doofus who sends me nasty messages and stalks me on this site moving my posts. ROFLMAO
From your link:
"The actual voting numbers are what you would expect," he said.
Wood County's total on Nov. 6 was 62,338 votes, he said, for a turnout of about 57 percent of registered voters.
Not only is that far below 108 percent -- it's well below the statewide turnout of about 68 percent reported by the secretary of state.
Obama's total in Wood County -- 31,596 votes, or about 51 percent of those cast -- was lower than his 2008 tally, according election night totals from the secretary of state. Mitt Romney received 28,997 votes, or about 47 percent -- less than John McCain's 2008 total.
You've been missed, LGS. Good to see that this most recent flouncing off tantrum didn't last, just like all the others.
There aren't many other posters so blind to reality that they'd actually post a link disproving their own claim.
Says the doofus who sends me nasty messages and stalks me on this site moving my posts. ROFLMAO
From your link:
"The actual voting numbers are what you would expect," he said.
Wood County's total on Nov. 6 was 62,338 votes, he said, for a turnout of about 57 percent of registered voters.
Not only is that far below 108 percent -- it's well below the statewide turnout of about 68 percent reported by the secretary of state.
Obama's total in Wood County -- 31,596 votes, or about 51 percent of those cast -- was lower than his 2008 tally, according election night totals from the secretary of state. Mitt Romney received 28,997 votes, or about 47 percent -- less than John McCain's 2008 total.
You've been missed, LGS. Good to see that this most recent flouncing off tantrum didn't last, just like all the others.
There aren't many other posters so blind to reality that they'd actually post a link disproving their own claim.
108% LIBERAL Your propaganda doesn't work..
We need to go to all paper ballots.. YOU CANNOT EVER TRUST A LIBERAL.
I provided more than one link.. guffaw gufawwwww hardy har harSays the doofus who sends me nasty messages and stalks me on this site moving my posts. ROFLMAO
From your link:
"The actual voting numbers are what you would expect," he said.
Wood County's total on Nov. 6 was 62,338 votes, he said, for a turnout of about 57 percent of registered voters.
Not only is that far below 108 percent -- it's well below the statewide turnout of about 68 percent reported by the secretary of state.
Obama's total in Wood County -- 31,596 votes, or about 51 percent of those cast -- was lower than his 2008 tally, according election night totals from the secretary of state. Mitt Romney received 28,997 votes, or about 47 percent -- less than John McCain's 2008 total.
You've been missed, LGS. Good to see that this most recent flouncing off tantrum didn't last, just like all the others.
There aren't many other posters so blind to reality that they'd actually post a link disproving their own claim.
108% LIBERAL Your propaganda doesn't work..
Using the link you provided to prove you wrong is "propaganda"?
I provided more than one link.. guffaw gufawwwww hardy har harSays the doofus who sends me nasty messages and stalks me on this site moving my posts. ROFLMAO
From your link:
"The actual voting numbers are what you would expect," he said.
Wood County's total on Nov. 6 was 62,338 votes, he said, for a turnout of about 57 percent of registered voters.
Not only is that far below 108 percent -- it's well below the statewide turnout of about 68 percent reported by the secretary of state.
Obama's total in Wood County -- 31,596 votes, or about 51 percent of those cast -- was lower than his 2008 tally, according election night totals from the secretary of state. Mitt Romney received 28,997 votes, or about 47 percent -- less than John McCain's 2008 total.
You've been missed, LGS. Good to see that this most recent flouncing off tantrum didn't last, just like all the others.
There aren't many other posters so blind to reality that they'd actually post a link disproving their own claim.
108% LIBERAL Your propaganda doesn't work..
Using the link you provided to prove you wrong is "propaganda"?
Here's another gufawwwwww gufawwww
Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud - Rachel Alexander - Page full
I can provide more all day long.. "-) You're welcome.. NO need to thank me.. Now run along and get busy stalking me.. Tata