BUSTED AGAIN! Think Progress gets caught faking another "Racist" Tea Party story!

[Mr. Shaman]

At every baseball game there are racists scattered thgroughout the stands.
In every crowded subway there are racists scattered throughout the cars.
In every large company, there are racists scattered throught the employee roll.

In every city, state, town, village, there are racists scattered around.

We rarely hear them or see them and likely dont know who they are as there are never reporters and others looking to find them.

....As if that's difficult.

*

*

*

Thanks to our left leaning politicians and our left leaning media, they search them out in only one group. The Tea Party.

When you can show me with absolute proof that the Tea Party has a higher ratio of racists in it than any other given group of people, then I would say the tea party has a responsibility to denounce it.

'Nuff SAID!!!

​

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

So.....there's a limit to the number o' RACIST-signs allowed.....per 'Bagger-herd????

I'd surely like to see proof of that.​

 

[drsmith1072]

At every baseball game there are racists scattered thgroughout the stands.
In every crowded subway there are racists scattered throughout the cars.
In every large company, there are racists scattered throught the employee roll.

In every city, state, town, village, there are racists scattered around.

We rarely hear them or see them and likely dont know who they are as there are never reporters and others looking to find them.

....As if that's difficult.

*

*

*

Thanks to our left leaning politicians and our left leaning media, they search them out in only one group. The Tea Party.

When you can show me with absolute proof that the Tea Party has a higher ratio of racists in it than any other given group of people, then I would say the tea party has a responsibility to denounce it.

'Nuff SAID!!!

​

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

And believe me....if you COULD, the left wing bloggers would have posted it by now.

Yep. You are a tool for the left wing. You regurgitate what they tell you is fact and they actually have you defending what they say without any evidence of it.

You should be ashamed of yourself. But of course, you are not.

It must be fun for you to believe that you get to redefine the debate by creating a work of fiction and then challenging people to prove a claim that they didn't make? The argument has never been that the tea party has a large portion of racists in their midst but that they have them in their midst (they do exist) and tend to tolerate them. So asking someone to provide evidence to prove a point that you made up is beyond dishonest.

 

[Jarhead]

....As if that's difficult.

*

*

*

'Nuff SAID!!!

​

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

So.....there's a limit to the number o' RACIST-signs allowed.....per 'Bagger-herd????

I'd surely like to see proof of that.​

Nope.

But for people like you there has to be. Normal minded people realize that there are racists in every crowd. But seeing as you believe that one racist in a crowd is enough to label the crowd as racists, then, yes, numbers/ratios must be used.

See? Thats what happens when you are a follower and used as a tool as you are. You come across very NAIVE.

 

[Jarhead]

....As if that's difficult.

*

*

*

'Nuff SAID!!!

​

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

And believe me....if you COULD, the left wing bloggers would have posted it by now.

Yep. You are a tool for the left wing. You regurgitate what they tell you is fact and they actually have you defending what they say without any evidence of it.

You should be ashamed of yourself. But of course, you are not.

It must be fun for you to believe that you get to redefine the debate? The argument has never been that the tea party has a large portion of racists in their midst but that they have them in their midst (they do exist) and tend to tolerate them. So asking someone to provide evidence to prove a point that you made up is beyond dishonest.

Actually, you are redefining the debate.

I simply asked earlier if The NY Yankees should apologize for having racists in the stands during a ball game. They are there. Everyone knows it. They are everywhere.

And your saying that the tea party tolerates it is disingenuous. I have seen tea party atetendees escort racists out on film.

But what difference does it make. I do not blame the New Black Panther Parety for the horrendous racial remarks of one of their members anymore than I blame the Mayor of Yonkers NY for any racists that live in that city.

You seem to have opted to blame normal citizens THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH for the actions of ANYONE that may be affiliated with them..,.....even if they dont know them.

 

[drsmith1072]

I didn't say you said the tea party was "white and only racist" why are you putting those words in my mouth? You claim that is the B.S. I am doing yet you are actually the one doing it yourself.

I typed the following words to you:
" Ok Dr.Smith Enjoy some truth now"
"whoa where did those guys come from?"
"<----oh oh oh proof of the media intentionally misrepresenting."
" say it ain't so the tea party kicking out racially insensitive people"
" wait what? I thought the tea party's were all for republicans, ooops guess not."
"yawn at all the repeated B.S. by the anti-teapartiers"

All I did was respond to your negative comments about the tea parties with 4 seperate threads, containing links to evidence, showing you that those comments and general attitudes are not entirely accurate or representative.

Instead of living up to my challenge of picking any one of them and trying to debate me on it you instead deflected and made a false attack on me by attempting to use the titles of one of the threads as a cop-out.

I'm still gladly waiting for you to bring me a challenge in any one of those threads, if your up for it.

You didn't respond to what I actually wrote. You posted links to your own BS opinion based threads that you CLAIM are the truth when the real TRUTH is that they couldn't be further from the truth. You present opinion as fact which is your usual tactic and as usual it and you fall flat.
In the end you failed to respond to what I actually wrote and still pretend that I am somehow the lesser because I didn't live up to your challenge as if the challenge of a cowardly hack who can't even address the actual content of a post is worth anything.

My response to your myriad of posts was for you to go and read the evidence of tea party behavior and individuals in those 4 links.

You have made several posts claiming the tea parties have a lot of racists, are only there to support republicans, and are only interested in attacking obama personally. I provided you 4 examples that show otherwise yet you can't rise up and have a counter argument to any one of those examples posted in the threads I linked. Instead you just continue to avoid it and throw insults and by doing so you are making me feel as if I've stumped you.

I'm right here standing tall waiting for you to present a challenge to any of the evidence that is in the original posts of those 4 threads I linked. I'm not hiding.

Once again you fail to respond even as you make shite up and attribute it to me.

I never once said that the tea party has a lot of racists, nor have I EVER said that they are only there to support republicans, nor have I ever said they are only interested in attacking obama personally.
However, if you could be so kind as to PROVE your allegations it would be greatly appreciated.
My guess is that you will avoid providing the proof becasue you don't have it, choose to attack me and then avoid the argument even more than you have to this point just like the last few times you tried to put words into my mouth.

So once again your opinion based challenge isn't worth shite based on how you failed once again to respond to the actual content of my posts even as you make up shite and try to assign it to me to try and CYA.

 

[daveman]

It must be fun for you to believe that you get to redefine the debate by creating a work of fiction and then challenging people to prove a claim that they didn't make? The argument has never been that the tea party has a large portion of racists in their midst but that they have them in their midst (they do exist) and tend to tolerate them. So asking someone to provide evidence to prove a point that you made up is beyond dishonest.

Oh, this is fun!

The left has terrorist-supporters in their midst and tend to tolerate them.

 

[drsmith1072]

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

So.....there's a limit to the number o' RACIST-signs allowed.....per 'Bagger-herd????

I'd surely like to see proof of that.​

Nope.

But for people like you there has to be. Normal minded people realize that there are racists in every crowd. But seeing as you believe that one racist in a crowd is enough to label the crowd as racists, then, yes, numbers/ratios must be used.

See? Thats what happens when you are a follower and used as a tool as you are. You come across very NAIVE.

Way to try and make lame excuses. in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN racists and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are racist. In one instance you know the racist is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the racsim or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

DO you understand how moronic your spin was?? You are trying to make lame excuses by comparing apples to lugnuts.

 

[daveman]

So.....there's a limit to the number o' RACIST-signs allowed.....per 'Bagger-herd????

I'd surely like to see proof of that.​

Nope.

But for people like you there has to be. Normal minded people realize that there are racists in every crowd. But seeing as you believe that one racist in a crowd is enough to label the crowd as racists, then, yes, numbers/ratios must be used.

See? Thats what happens when you are a follower and used as a tool as you are. You come across very NAIVE.

Way to try and make lame excuses. in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN racists and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are racist. In one instance you know the racist is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the racsim or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

DO you understand how moronic your spin was?? You are trying to make lame excuses by comparing apples to lugnuts.

in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN terrorist supporters and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are terrorist supporters. In one instance you know the terrorist supporter is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the terrorist support or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

 

[ConHog]

First, I read both the original link and the source material, and the link the OP gave IS slightly misleading in that ThinkProgress did Not call this guy a Tea Partier, which of course makes the OP somewhat of a lie. I say somewhat because although they did not call him a Tea Partier, they CLEARLY did try to associate him with the movement as closely as possible , in an obvious attempt to tie racism to the Tea Party.

Second, the fact that they didn't outright say he's a Tea Partier doesn't mitigate the fact that they clearly tried to tie his racism to the Tea Party; that's pathetic.

Third, did Ravi really come someone out for lying? 38 lies in 5 pages I remind you Ravi... You have yet to return to that thread and explain yourself or admit error, or apologize for lying. In other words, shut your cake hole.

To the OP. You're no better than she when you are disingenuous with your thread titles.

 

[drsmith1072]

Enough said per my argument.

You showed me 4 signs out of tens of thosuands.

Show me a picture where there are 4 signs out of 100 signs....ONE PICTURE, not a collage.....and I would say that 4% of the tea parey is racist which is STILL likely to be well below the national average.

You did exactly what the left wing bloggers do. You cherry pick 4 pictures from likely 3 different tea parties and make it look like the norm.

Show me a picture of ONE TEA PARTY ralley that shows MANY racist signs or gestures...

And believe me....if you COULD, the left wing bloggers would have posted it by now.

Yep. You are a tool for the left wing. You regurgitate what they tell you is fact and they actually have you defending what they say without any evidence of it.

You should be ashamed of yourself. But of course, you are not.

It must be fun for you to believe that you get to redefine the debate? The argument has never been that the tea party has a large portion of racists in their midst but that they have them in their midst (they do exist) and tend to tolerate them. So asking someone to provide evidence to prove a point that you made up is beyond dishonest.

Actually, you are redefining the debate.

I simply asked earlier if The NY Yankees should apologize for having racists in the stands during a ball game. They are there. Everyone knows it. They are everywhere.

And your saying that the tea party tolerates it is disingenuous. I have seen tea party atetendees escort racists out on film.

But what difference does it make. I do not blame the New Black Panther Parety for the horrendous racial remarks of one of their members anymore than I blame the Mayor of Yonkers NY for any racists that live in that city.

You seem to have opted to blame normal citizens THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH for the actions of ANYONE that may be affiliated with them..,.....even if they dont know them.

whether or not the tea party tolerates racism is part of the debate so how are my statements and questions concerning that redefining the debate??

You on the other hand did try to redefine the debate when you created a work of fiction and then asked people to prove that "the Tea Party has a higher ratio of racists in it than any other given groupo of people" when no one made that claim.

as to your misguided argument of racisim at a yankee game how do you know who is racist and who is not?? If they are holding signs displaying it or making statements confirming it then one can make that call and CHOOSE whether to tolerate it or not but if they are not openly displaying it then your argument is nothing but spin.

 

[drsmith1072]

Nope.

But for people like you there has to be. Normal minded people realize that there are racists in every crowd. But seeing as you believe that one racist in a crowd is enough to label the crowd as racists, then, yes, numbers/ratios must be used.

See? Thats what happens when you are a follower and used as a tool as you are. You come across very NAIVE.

Way to try and make lame excuses. in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN racists and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are racist. In one instance you know the racist is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the racsim or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

DO you understand how moronic your spin was?? You are trying to make lame excuses by comparing apples to lugnuts.

in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN terrorist supporters and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are terrorist supporters. In one instance you know the terrorist supporter is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the terrorist support or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

Way to go offtopic and show your desperation as you try to argue that one wrong is justified by another. However, do you have anything to say about what was actually said or is trolling and triyng to change the subject to avoid content you can't deal with all you have to offer??

 

[Jarhead]

It must be fun for you to believe that you get to redefine the debate? The argument has never been that the tea party has a large portion of racists in their midst but that they have them in their midst (they do exist) and tend to tolerate them. So asking someone to provide evidence to prove a point that you made up is beyond dishonest.

Actually, you are redefining the debate.

I simply asked earlier if The NY Yankees should apologize for having racists in the stands during a ball game. They are there. Everyone knows it. They are everywhere.

And your saying that the tea party tolerates it is disingenuous. I have seen tea party atetendees escort racists out on film.

But what difference does it make. I do not blame the New Black Panther Parety for the horrendous racial remarks of one of their members anymore than I blame the Mayor of Yonkers NY for any racists that live in that city.

You seem to have opted to blame normal citizens THAT YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH for the actions of ANYONE that may be affiliated with them..,.....even if they dont know them.

whether or not the tea party tolerates racism is part of the debate so how are my statements and questions concerning that redefining the debate??

I may have misread your criticism of my post

You on the other hand did try to redefine the debate when you created a work of fiction and then asked people to prove that "the Tea Party has a higher ratio of racists in it than any other given groupo of people" when no one made that claim.

I do not see it as a work of fiction. I have seen many on the left refer to the tea party as a group of racists. You may not feel that way, but many do.

as to your misguided argument of racisim at a yankee game how do you know who is racist and who is not?? If they are holding signs displaying it or making statements confirming it then one can make that call and CHOOSE whether to tolerate it or not but if they are not openly displaying it then your argument is nothing but spin.

Fair enough argument on your part. The analogy was not a good one. I retract it

My responses in blue.
Have a great weekend.

 

[Wicked Jester]

yawn is right, IF I had ever actually said that the tea party was "white only and racist" then your spin might actually apply but seeing as how I NEVER DID you BS is the typical tactic of rightwinger hacks who try to insert words into other people's mouths so they can attack or discredit them for something they NEVER said. I thought you were above that type of BS, I guess i was wrong.

BTW how does linking to your own OPINION based posts on a mesage board prove anything or have anything to do with the "truth", let alone actually apply to what I actually said??

Do you have a response to the content of my post or is presenting your own BS opinons as "truth" all that you have to offer??

I didn't say you said the tea party was "white and only racist" why are you putting those words in my mouth? You claim that is the B.S. I am doing yet you are actually the one doing it yourself.

I typed the following words to you:
" Ok Dr.Smith Enjoy some truth now"
"whoa where did those guys come from?"
"<----oh oh oh proof of the media intentionally misrepresenting."
" say it ain't so the tea party kicking out racially insensitive people"
" wait what? I thought the tea party's were all for republicans, ooops guess not."
"yawn at all the repeated B.S. by the anti-teapartiers"

All I did was respond to your negative comments about the tea parties with 4 seperate threads, containing links to evidence, showing you that those comments and general attitudes are not entirely accurate or representative.

Instead of living up to my challenge of picking any one of them and trying to debate me on it you instead deflected and made a false attack on me by attempting to use the titles of one of the threads as a cop-out.

I'm still gladly waiting for you to bring me a challenge in any one of those threads, if your up for it.

You didn't respond to what I actually wrote. You posted links to your own BS opinion based threads that you CLAIM are the truth when the real TRUTH is that they couldn't be further from the truth. You present opinion as fact which is your usual tactic and as usual it and you fall flat.
In the end you failed to respond to what I actually wrote and still pretend that I am somehow the lesser because I didn't live up to your challenge as if the challenge of a cowardly hack who can't even address the actual content of a post is worth anything.

I would have to say that the following statement by Limbaugh fits the above poster to a tee:

"When liberals hurl epithets at you because you have pointed out the OBVIOUS error of their ways, just know that you have hit a nerve. If you criticize their behavior and they call you a pig, a bigot, or a fascist (in this case, "a cowardly hack"), their consciences must be giving them problems; or else they acquired their liberal values rote and without comprehension. They claim to have a monopoly on the market of open-mindeness and tolerence, but in truth are often closed-minded and intolerant"

Yep!

 

[Stephanie]

It's not a demand but a request along with the agreement that if you don't want to be labeled as racist then you need to expel the racist elements from your movement.

If you don't mind the label then by all means keep them as part of your movement but then don't cry and whine when the tea party gets labeled racist. If you allow it then you deserve the label.

see here folks, this says it all.
do as we say, or you will BE LABELED A RACIST.
that is what works for the Left-Liberlas-Progressive-commies, because they HAVE NOTHING ELSE.

It's called common sense but it's too bad for you that you don't have any.
If you allow them to continue to be part of your ranks then it is on you. Just don't whine and cry as you try desperately to play the helpless victim when you get called out for it.

How about some personal responsibility? Or do you hypocrites only preach that to others as you refuse to apply it to yourself?

LOL, as if the Tea Party can CONTROL every person who comes to their rallies. Just like the Democrats-lefties controlled all the people who attended the Anti-war protesting when they were burning American flags, camping out on Bush's lawn, etc etc.
I we are deserving of the label RACIST. then every damn Liberal Democrat who was behind the Anti-war protesters were DESERVING OF THE LABEL, UNAMERCIAN.
which is what you are showing yourself to be, big time.
what ever happen to the lefties battle cry, DISSENT IS PATROTIC. I guess that only goes for when they are doing it. And they are carring signs of Bush as everything disgusting you all could think up. the only difference there, is Bush was white, so NO BODY could scream racist as they do now evertime there is dissent againt the Obama.

two faced HYPOCRITES, THE ALL OF YOU

 

[007]

LOL, as if the Tea Party can CONTROL every person who comes to their rallies.

Especially the liberals, ACORN members and other assorted, militant, progressive activist plants that go to act out and give the Tea Party a bad name intentionally.

 

[Jarhead]

Way to try and make lame excuses. in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN racists and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are racist. In one instance you know the racist is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the racsim or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

DO you understand how moronic your spin was?? You are trying to make lame excuses by comparing apples to lugnuts.

in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN terrorist supporters and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are terrorist supporters. In one instance you know the terrorist supporter is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the terrorist support or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

Way to go offtopic and show your desperation as you try to argue that one wrong is justified by another. However, do you have anything to say about what was actually said or is trolling and triyng to change the subject to avoid content you can't deal with all you have to offer??

I think what he was trying to do was to point out to you that when there is a msall minority of bad apples, most tend to ignore them and go on their way. They do not want to lend those bad apples any credibility and to be quite frank, most are afraid to rub a racist or pro terrorist the wroing way. I mean, if you can go in public with a sign with th N word on it, then you are a bit warped. Who knows what that person may do if you got in his face.

Smae holds true for those that carry pro terrorist signs. They are warped and could be quite dangerous.

I have learned to stay away from people that display warped behavior in public. And yes, I learned my lesson the hard way.

 

[Wicked Jester]

see here folks, this says it all.
do as we say, or you will BE LABELED A RACIST.
that is what works for the Left-Liberlas-Progressive-commies, because they HAVE NOTHING ELSE.

It's called common sense but it's too bad for you that you don't have any.
If you allow them to continue to be part of your ranks then it is on you. Just don't whine and cry as you try desperately to play the helpless victim when you get called out for it.

How about some personal responsibility? Or do you hypocrites only preach that to others as you refuse to apply it to yourself?

LOL, as if the Tea Party can CONTROL every person who comes to their rallies. Just like the Democrats-lefties controlled all the people who attended the Anti-war protesting when they were burning American flags, camping out on Bush's lawn, etc etc.
I we are deserving of the label RACIST. then every damn Liberal Democrat who was behind the Anti-war protesters were DESERVING OF THE LABEL, UNAMERCIAN.
which is what you are showing yourself to be, big time.
what ever happen to the lefties battle cry, DISSENT IS PATROTIC. I guess that only goes for when they are doing it. And they are carring signs of Bush as everything disgusting you all could think up. the only difference there, is Bush was white, so NO BODY could scream racist as they do now evertime there is dissent againt the Obama.

two faced HYPIOCRITES, THE ALL OF YOU

It begs the question Steph. Was this drsmith Character whining about Robert Byrd. Did he demand the dem party remove him. Were the progressive loons demanding the dem's remove him?

Of course not. And we ALL know why.

You are absolutely right!.....Progressives are hypocrites to the core.

 

[daveman]

Way to try and make lame excuses. in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN racists and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are racist. In one instance you know the racist is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the racsim or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

DO you understand how moronic your spin was?? You are trying to make lame excuses by comparing apples to lugnuts.

in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN terrorist supporters and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are terrorist supporters. In one instance you know the terrorist supporter is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the terrorist support or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

Way to go offtopic and show your desperation as you try to argue that one wrong is justified by another. However, do you have anything to say about what was actually said or is trolling and triyng to change the subject to avoid content you can't deal with all you have to offer??

I understand that you object to what you use instead of logic being applied to you the same as you apply it to others.

If you don't mind the label then by all means keep terrorist supporters as part of your movement but then don't cry and whine when your group gets labeled terrorist supporters. If you allow it then you deserve the label.

 

[daveman]

in case you missed it there is a HUGE difference between OPEN terrorist supporters and the people at the office who don't go around advertising that they are terrorist supporters. In one instance you know the terrorist supporter is there and can actually do something about it and that CHOICE defines whether you are WILLING to tolerate the terrorist support or not and in the other you have no clue and can't do anything about it.

Way to go offtopic and show your desperation as you try to argue that one wrong is justified by another. However, do you have anything to say about what was actually said or is trolling and triyng to change the subject to avoid content you can't deal with all you have to offer??

I think what he was trying to do was to point out to you that when there is a msall minority of bad apples, most tend to ignore them and go on their way. They do not want to lend those bad apples any credibility and to be quite frank, most are afraid to rub a racist or pro terrorist the wroing way. I mean, if you can go in public with a sign with th N word on it, then you are a bit warped. Who knows what that person may do if you got in his face.

Smae holds true for those that carry pro terrorist signs. They are warped and could be quite dangerous.

I have learned to stay away from people that display warped behavior in public. And yes, I learned my lesson the hard way.

 

[Sarah G]

In reality they named him as someone running as a Republican that was encouraging the tea partiers to cultivate racists.

Are you stupid or just a bad liar?

Both.