Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So please make your position clear.Sure they could turn down library wings or any of the other offers to help keep college affordable. We all know no one has any problem with the price of a college education now and no one is going to be bothered by it going even higher to pay for that library wing.
I take it you think you that bribery is a good idea. You can give to the policemens fund where all police benefit. But I think it is wrong for someone to bribe one officer and them to accept.
If someone does not have acceptable scores to get into college then they should not get in. For colleges to not accept donations that helps everyone at the college is crazy.
I guess you really have a problem understanding.So please make your position clear.Sure they could turn down library wings or any of the other offers to help keep college affordable. We all know no one has any problem with the price of a college education now and no one is going to be bothered by it going even higher to pay for that library wing.
I take it you think you that bribery is a good idea. You can give to the policemens fund where all police benefit. But I think it is wrong for someone to bribe one officer and them to accept.
If someone does not have acceptable scores to get into college then they should not get in. For colleges to not accept donations that helps everyone at the college is crazy.
Are you defending corruption in college admissions or are you against it?
They are only going after the small fries here, the people who make $500,000 bribes to get their kids into college.
I am not the only one who has pointed out that the AG's comment - 'We are not talking about buying a building' - was dumb as hell, as if buying a college a building (BRIBE) is ok, but putting money directly into the pockets of school staff / coaches is not.They are only going after the small fries here, the people who make $500,000 bribes to get their kids into college.
If you bribe BIG -- say enough money to add a wing to a building, well, that's still perfectly legal.
They are only going after the small fries here, the people who make $500,000 bribes to get their kids into college.
If you bribe BIG -- say enough money to add a wing to a building, well, that's still perfectly legal.
I am not the only one who has pointed out that the AG's comment - 'We are not talking about buying a building' - was dumb as hell, as if buying a college a building (BRIBE) is ok, but putting money directly into the pockets of school staff / coaches is not.They are only going after the small fries here, the people who make $500,000 bribes to get their kids into college.
If you bribe BIG -- say enough money to add a wing to a building, well, that's still perfectly legal.
As long as the institution is private, I don't see the issue with the building donation or legacy route.
What has happened is all the people in the forefront and have a national or regional recognition can not accept that their children are spoiled and not the best of civility. So the pay to make it look better. To not be embarrassed. I understand it. Fiefdoms of power are the reality. There is so much more then this as the tip of the iceberg will probably not be eclipsed. To protect the cheaters who are so important. As most are progressive socialists in politics.
It actually IS a zero sum game. Every undeserving kid that gets admitted keeps someone who IS deserving from being admittedNot only are bribes and actions like this illegal, unethical, unfair, and selfish, but they also actually harm other people in the process. It’s not a zero sum game so to speak.
It actually IS a zero sum game. Every undeserving kid that gets admitted keeps someone who IS deserving from being admittedNot only are bribes and actions like this illegal, unethical, unfair, and selfish, but they also actually harm other people in the process. It’s not a zero sum game so to speak.
As long as the institution is private, I don't see the issue with the building donation or legacy route.
None of these schools are 'private', meaning no federal money whatsoever. Also, hiding the fact that you can just BUY your kids' way into college is fraud. This is obviously illegal based on the FBI being involved and making arrests.
So you are OK with a system that allows bribes and f*s deserving students.
Then what is wrong with bribing an Electoral College Voter by buying them a House or a car to vote a certain way? What is wrong with buying a politician by buying them a private jet or a yacht?
I am not trying to 'bash' you - If that's what you believe that's fine. I have no serious heartburn with it. We will just agree to disagree. Thank you for being honest.
It actually IS a zero sum game. Every undeserving kid that gets admitted keeps someone who IS deserving from being admittedNot only are bribes and actions like this illegal, unethical, unfair, and selfish, but they also actually harm other people in the process. It’s not a zero sum game so to speak.
Like I said, we are going to have to agree to disagree. I don't care if it is 'out in the open', 'giving a school a building' to get your kid into a college is still a bribe, just as if you walked up and gave the dean of the college a wad of cash. You think that was / is ok. I don't.With the old system, the legacies and the library building people, there was no fraud. It was out in the open, and again I doubt those few that go that route impact the general admissions.