BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: 73-Year-Old Pastor and Purple Heart Veteran Arrested For Being at Capitol, His Son Also Arrested in Front of 3-Year-Old Daughter (

You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
LOLOL

Lemme guess ... your "evidence" is your own hallucination ... amirite? Because my evidence is them inside the Capitol...

Cusicks.jpg
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
Didn't have to. If he merely went to the Capitol and stood around outside, he broke no laws and should not have been arrested. Called as a witness maybe, but not arrested. Heck, he could have even said to a passerby that he wished TRUMP! had clearly won the election and broken no laws. Let's get real extreme here and say he could have publicly stated that he even VOTED for TRUMP! and broke no laws. So there's that.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
LOLOL

Lemme guess ... your "evidence" is your own hallucination ... amirite? Because my evidence is them inside the Capitol...

Cusicks.jpg
You say "them". Why? We're talking about this one guy. You do realize your error, right?
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
Didn't have to. If he merely went to the Capitol and stood around outside, he broke no laws and should not have been arrested. Called as a witness maybe, but not arrested. Heck, he could have even said to a passerby that he wished TRUMP! had clearly won the election and broken no laws. Let's get real extreme here and say he could have publicly stated that he even VOTED for TRUMP! and broke no laws. So there's that.


Lesperance also admitted that “they” had entered the Capitol, but he initially refused give an exact name as to who “they” were. He simply indicated that the term included his pastor.

Investigators were able to make the connection to the Cusicks in a few ways.

The FBI first connected Lesperance to James Cusick Jr. through social media. Cusick Jr. is the founder and pastor of a church in Melbourne, Fla., some seven miles from where Lesperance lives, and officials found a picture on the church’s Instagram page that included both James Cusick and Lesperance.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
LOLOL

Lemme guess ... your "evidence" is your own hallucination ... amirite? Because my evidence is them inside the Capitol...

Cusicks.jpg
You say "them". Why? We're talking about this one guy. You do realize your error, right?
I'm talking about the two men mentioned in the OP...

A 73-year-old Purple Heart Vietnam veteran and pastor James Cusick has been arrested at his home in Florida for being at the Capitol on January 6, though he was not involved in any violence or vandalism.

His son Casey, was also arrested in front of his distraught 3-year-old daughter who asked why they were locking her dad’s hands. He is also not accused of any violence or vandalism. Videos of the heartbreaking scene were provided to the Gateway Pundit.

... It doesn't matter which of them you're talking about, they were both inside the Capitol.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
LOLOL

Lemme guess ... your "evidence" is your own hallucination ... amirite? Because my evidence is them inside the Capitol...

Cusicks.jpg
You say "them". Why? We're talking about this one guy. You do realize your error, right?
I'm talking about the two men mentioned in the OP...

A 73-year-old Purple Heart Vietnam veteran and pastor James Cusick has been arrested at his home in Florida for being at the Capitol on January 6, though he was not involved in any violence or vandalism.
His son Casey, was also arrested in front of his distraught 3-year-old daughter who asked why they were locking her dad’s hands. He is also not accused of any violence or vandalism. Videos of the heartbreaking scene were provided to the Gateway Pundit.

... It doesn't matter which of them you're talking about, they were both inside the Capitol.
If they were in the capitol, they will probably be charged with trespassing. If not, it's a bad arrest. You seem very sure they were in there. From where do you get that?
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
Didn't have to. If he merely went to the Capitol and stood around outside, he broke no laws and should not have been arrested. Called as a witness maybe, but not arrested. Heck, he could have even said to a passerby that he wished TRUMP! had clearly won the election and broken no laws. Let's get real extreme here and say he could have publicly stated that he even VOTED for TRUMP! and broke no laws. So there's that.


Lesperance also admitted that “they” had entered the Capitol, but he initially refused give an exact name as to who “they” were. He simply indicated that the term included his pastor.

Investigators were able to make the connection to the Cusicks in a few ways.

The FBI first connected Lesperance to James Cusick Jr. through social media. Cusick Jr. is the founder and pastor of a church in Melbourne, Fla., some seven miles from where Lesperance lives, and officials found a picture on the church’s Instagram page that included both James Cusick and Lesperance.
We'll have to see if it holds up in court. If he says no, he wasn't there, it's he said/he said unless there's photo or video evidence to settle it one way or another.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
The evidence we have right now says he wasn't.
LOLOL

Lemme guess ... your "evidence" is your own hallucination ... amirite? Because my evidence is them inside the Capitol...

Cusicks.jpg
You say "them". Why? We're talking about this one guy. You do realize your error, right?
I'm talking about the two men mentioned in the OP...

A 73-year-old Purple Heart Vietnam veteran and pastor James Cusick has been arrested at his home in Florida for being at the Capitol on January 6, though he was not involved in any violence or vandalism.
His son Casey, was also arrested in front of his distraught 3-year-old daughter who asked why they were locking her dad’s hands. He is also not accused of any violence or vandalism. Videos of the heartbreaking scene were provided to the Gateway Pundit.

... It doesn't matter which of them you're talking about, they were both inside the Capitol.
If they were in the capitol, they will probably be charged with trespassing. If not, it's a bad arrest. You seem very sure they were in there. From where do you get that?
LOLOL

I just fucking showed you a screen shot of them inside the Capitol. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?? :cuckoo:
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
Didn't have to. If he merely went to the Capitol and stood around outside, he broke no laws and should not have been arrested. Called as a witness maybe, but not arrested. Heck, he could have even said to a passerby that he wished TRUMP! had clearly won the election and broken no laws. Let's get real extreme here and say he could have publicly stated that he even VOTED for TRUMP! and broke no laws. So there's that.


Lesperance also admitted that “they” had entered the Capitol, but he initially refused give an exact name as to who “they” were. He simply indicated that the term included his pastor.

Investigators were able to make the connection to the Cusicks in a few ways.

The FBI first connected Lesperance to James Cusick Jr. through social media. Cusick Jr. is the founder and pastor of a church in Melbourne, Fla., some seven miles from where Lesperance lives, and officials found a picture on the church’s Instagram page that included both James Cusick and Lesperance.
We'll have to see if it holds up in court. If he says no, he wasn't there, it's he said/he said unless there's photo or video evidence to settle it one way or another.
LOLOLOL

I showed you the image of them inside the Capitol. If they attempt to lie in court and deny they were inside, perjury charges can be added.
 
You would think he would set a better example than to support a scoundrel like Trump
And now we see the usual suspects cheering on and supporting the criminalization of opinion. Way to go, suspects. Unless this guy broke a law, it's a bad arrest and probably leads to a big payday for him.
If he was inside the Capitol that day, he broke a law.
Didn’t look like a prayer meeting
Didn't have to. If he merely went to the Capitol and stood around outside, he broke no laws and should not have been arrested. Called as a witness maybe, but not arrested. Heck, he could have even said to a passerby that he wished TRUMP! had clearly won the election and broken no laws. Let's get real extreme here and say he could have publicly stated that he even VOTED for TRUMP! and broke no laws. So there's that.


Lesperance also admitted that “they” had entered the Capitol, but he initially refused give an exact name as to who “they” were. He simply indicated that the term included his pastor.

Investigators were able to make the connection to the Cusicks in a few ways.

The FBI first connected Lesperance to James Cusick Jr. through social media. Cusick Jr. is the founder and pastor of a church in Melbourne, Fla., some seven miles from where Lesperance lives, and officials found a picture on the church’s Instagram page that included both James Cusick and Lesperance.
We'll have to see if it holds up in court. If he says no, he wasn't there, it's he said/he said unless there's photo or video evidence to settle it one way or another.
I suspect a slap on the wrist is coming
 
This arrest was necessary so that Mac1958 can sleep at night without the horrible nightmares of trump voters coming to get him
 

No WMDs being found by the inspection team doesn't mean squat.
* Saddam Hussein said Irak had no WMDs.

* Tariq Aziz said Irak had no WMDs.

* Hans Blix said Irak had no WMDs.

* The UN Inspection team said Irak had no WMDs.

* The American military said Irak had no WMDs.

* President Bush said Irak had no WMDs.


FINAL & PROVEN CONCLUSION: There were no WMDs in Irak.
That is a lie.
The lie is saying that Sadam had no WMDs when chemical warfare isn't possible without WMDs. The weapon is the delivery system, mass is it's capabilities or kill ratios, and the destruction is it's toll taken by whatever means or assets chosen to be used. Sadam was caught dropping acid and other chemical's (WMDs), on the Kurds.
 

No WMDs being found by the inspection team doesn't mean squat.
* Saddam Hussein said Irak had no WMDs.

* Tariq Aziz said Irak had no WMDs.

* Hans Blix said Irak had no WMDs.

* The UN Inspection team said Irak had no WMDs.

* The American military said Irak had no WMDs.

* President Bush said Irak had no WMDs.


FINAL & PROVEN CONCLUSION: There were no WMDs in Irak.
That is a lie.
The lie is saying that Sadam had no WMDs when chemical warfare isn't possible without WMDs. The weapon is the delivery system, mass is it's capabilities or kill ratios, and the destruction is it's toll taken by whatever means or assets chosen to be used. Sadam was caught dropping acid and other chemical's (WMDs), on the Kurds.
That was many years earlier. By 2003, he had no stockpiles claimed by Bush prior to invading.
 
The lie is saying that Sadam had no WMDs when chemical warfare isn't possible without WMDs. The weapon is the delivery system, mass is it's capabilities or kill ratios, and the destruction is it's toll taken by whatever means or assets chosen to be used. Sadam was caught dropping acid and other chemical's (WMDs), on the Kurds.
I am here, on this thread, to talk about facts but you must be about 12-years-old and incapable of adult understanding.
 
The lie is saying that Sadam had no WMDs when chemical warfare isn't possible without WMDs. The weapon is the delivery system, mass is it's capabilities or kill ratios, and the destruction is it's toll taken by whatever means or assets chosen to be used. Sadam was caught dropping acid and other chemical's (WMDs), on the Kurds.
That was many years earlier. By 2003, he had no stockpiles claimed by Bush prior to invading.
... as the UN inspection proved. But good luck trying to talk sense to that adolescent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top