BIDEN is the one BREAKING THE LAW.So much for the constitution.
He needs to be held accountable.
He needs to be impeached immediately.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BIDEN is the one BREAKING THE LAW.So much for the constitution.
Yeah, Mexico has created quite the noncontributing self-serving economy within our economy haven’t they?Unemployment is like 3% dude. WTF are you talking about?
Excellent. You statist assholes are finally catching on.And nowhere in the constitution does it say any of your excuses give Texas the ability to overrule the federal government.
So now we have a constitutional crisis and a rogue state who is using their military to usurp power from the federal government.
You can't play both sides of that fiddle.The national guard gets deployed all the time, it’s not to repel invasions but to assist in humanitarian crises.
Texas is attempting to enforce immigration law which is a federal law, and therefore unconstitutional. they’re preventing federal agents from doing their job, which is unconstitutional.
Because that’s illegal discrimination.
Are Republicans the party of pro-discrimination now?
You mean federal law NON enforcement.It’s pretty silly for you to want a law that makes it illegal to interfere in federal law enforcement. I think we are both well aware how illegal that is.
As for asylum law, that’s 8 USC 1158
You have no idea what they're fleeing.No. An invasion is when an army crosses your border to seize territory.
People fleeing violence and poverty are not an invading army.
What does the UN have to do with the president?So Biden is a dictator ignoring the United nations law?
Can’t be illegal because the administration is executing the law as the constitution says.
Your opinion, and the opinion of a governor, is constitutionally irrelevant.
Refusing to assist is not the same as preventing from enforcing.You can't play both sides of that fiddle.
Dem states and cities declared themselves illegal immigrant sanctuary cities, shielding and refusing to provide information about illegals in response to lawful federal requests. They hindered the fed. Now Texas is doing similar, but with a different goal.
Where does the Constitution say that the Governor of Texas can't protect the Texas border? It says the Fed has a responsibility to protect Texas, and the Fed has not been fulfilling that obligation.
This is a serious question, and so far you have not answered it. If you prefer to quote a federal law instead, go ahead. No BS opinion links, please, text of law. I would be happy to get educated by you on this.
Regards,
Jim
Refusing to assist is not the same as preventing from enforcing.
Maybe Abbott should start bussing them to your shithole country.You certainly can't do that in the USA either, but you're too gullible or stupid to realize it.
Where is your evidence that illegals are voting in elections. But yeah - you can walk into Canada and have instant full coverage health care, guaranteed income, relocation assistance, job training, and free education.
What kind of support do government-assisted refugees get?
ircc.canada.ca
You can't vote though, any more than you can vote in the USA.
People on US soil are allowed to apply for asylum. So yes they are preventing them from doing their job.Texas is not preventing enforcement. It closed one of its parks park to prevent violation of its own laws (SB4).
On December 19, 2023, the court of appeals entered an
injunction pending appeal that bars Border Patrol agents from
“damaging, destroying, or otherwise interfering with Texas’s
c[oncertina]-wire fence in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas,”
except “if necessary to address any medical emergency as specified
in the [temporary restraining order]” previously issued by the
district court. Appl. App. 14a. In its decision, the court of
appeals noted that “Border Patrol agents already possess access to
both sides of the fence . . . to the river and bank by boat and
to the further-inland side of the fence by road.”
Notably, in Biden's original suit against Texas which they are piggybacking on with yesterday's filing, Biden Admin did not even argue about immigration law, they argued that Texas is blocking a river in violation of the 1899 Rivers and Harbors Act....
As alleged below, Defendants have built structures in the Rio Grande, a navigable
water of the United States, without the Corps’ authorization, in violation of RHA section 10, 33
U.S.C. § 403.
What a clown show this Admin is.
If you listen to what they claim they are here for it's for jobs, economic opportunity etc.....Laws granting asylum status most assuredly are part of established immigration laws and not in conflict with the law you cited.
Biden is not executing immigration laws at all, moron.Can’t be illegal because the administration is executing the law as the constitution says.
Your opinion, and the opinion of a governor, is constitutionally irrelevant.
Where does it say "I want a job" is grounds for asylum, Stupid?It’s pretty silly for you to want a law that makes it illegal to interfere in federal law enforcement. I think we are both well aware how illegal that is.
As for asylum law, that’s 8 USC 1158
Intelligence? You couldn't handle any of that.To texass?
EWWW!
I might get some on me.
Only official ports of entry. Wading across the Rio in the middle of nowhere isn't an official port of entry, Simp.You can apply for asylum anywhere by law.
SCOTUS isn’t a legislature. They can’t change laws.
Fleeing poverty isn't grounds for asylum, Dumbass.No. An invasion is when an army crosses your border to seize territory.
People fleeing violence and poverty are not an invading army.
Link?They can be anywhere and apply for asylum.