Bob Woodward: Bush Didn't Lie About WMDs to Justify Iraq War

[Claudette]

Funny whenever Woodward prints something the left agrees with he's 100% correct.

If its something they don't agree with he's a liar.

Funny how that works.

 

[konradv]

Funny whenever Woodward prints something the left agrees with he's 100% correct.. If its something they don't agree with he's a liar. Funny how that works.

Can you honestly say it doesn't work the other way around, too? Let a normally disparaged liberal columnist attack Obama and see what happens, Also, remember when LIEbermann turned into one of the darlings of the right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Funny whenever Woodward prints something the left agrees with he's 100% correct.

If its something they don't agree with he's a liar.

Funny how that works.

How many people do you agree with on everything?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Everybody knows "Bush lied" is a hackneyed left-wing mantra.

It's been proven he lied. Woodward, unintentionally, proves it even further.

 

[Wildman]

It's been proven he lied. Woodward, unintentionally, proves it even further.

i fail to see the logic in your statement, how did "Woodward, unintentionally, proves it even further." ??

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Bush was against going into Iraq? Is that the new version of history that you're trying to sell?

Nope... Bush was against exaggerating the Intelligence on WMD.

Which was not Exaggerated...

Both Kay and Dulfer Reports, reported massive stores of CBW "Chemical Biological Weapons" stores and on-going programs.

The Media simply refused to equate CBW with WMD... when the terms are in every way, SYNONYMOUS.

What's more, the evidence that tens of thousands of tons of material had been moved to Syria, over the 18 month period, between the US announcing its intention to invade if Iraq did not comply with US and International demands, and the invasion, was also not widely reported..., but remains irrefutable.

In truth, Bush did not lie.

Iraq was in material breach of its obligations and was a general menace to world stability and Iraq sorely needed to be squelched.

That Iraq WAS squelched and there remains today, 7 years after obama began REVERSING the gains made by US forces, does not change the need for such, in the wake of 9-11.

That you feel such is the case, says much more about YOU, than anything else.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Everybody knows "Bush lied" is a hackneyed left-wing mantra.

It's been proven he lied. Woodward, unintentionally, proves it even further.

No... Wrong again Gilligan. There is NO EVIDENCE, (That's ZERO...) that "Bush Lied".

(Reader, once again Gilligan comes to lament reality and its effect on the viability of the delusion that it needs to set over reality, for its pitiful existence to make 'sense'. )

 

[chikenwing]

If Bush was skeptical about WMDs, why was Rumsfeld on the Sunday morning talk shows calling Saddam an "immediate threat" to the U.S.? Sounds like he was willing to take advantage of lies, which in the end amounts to the same thing as lying.

For the very same reasons Clinton and his admin,were saying the same things.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If Bush was skeptical about WMDs, why was Rumsfeld on the Sunday morning talk shows calling Saddam an "immediate threat" to the U.S.? Sounds like he was willing to take advantage of lies, which in the end amounts to the same thing as lying.

Bush was not skeptical about WMDs. And there's no evidence that he was.

He simply did not feel that the presence of such was essential to the sound moral justification to invade Iraq and destroy their fascist government.

What the article states is that Bush did not want the evidence of Chemical/Biological Weapons: EXAGGERATED... and as the evidence proves, the evidence was not exaggerated.

 

[candycorn]

Bush was against going into Iraq? Is that the new version of history that you're trying to sell?

Nope... Bush was against exaggerating the Intelligence on WMD.

Which was not Exaggerated...

Both Kay and Dulfer Reports, reported massive stores of CBW "Chemical Biological Weapons" stores and on-going programs.

The Media simply refused to equate CBW with WMD... when the terms are in every way, SYNONYMOUS.

Ahh...it's the media's fault. Of course....it always is with you guys.

What's more, the evidence that tens of thousands of tons of material had been moved to Syria, over the 18 month period, between the US announcing its intention to invade if Iraq did not comply with US and International demands, and the invasion, was also not widely reported..., but remains irrefutable.

Of course it does....so irrefutable that you cited it...oh wait; you didn't.

Iraq was in material breach of its obligations and was a general menace to world stability and Iraq sorely needed to be squelched.

That Iraq WAS squelched and there remains today, 7 years after obama began REVERSING the gains made by US forces, does not change the need for such, in the wake of 9-11.

Of which Iraq played no part. So I guess the next time your across the street neighbor plays his stereo too loud, your logic would be to go next door and beat the shit out of him.

That you feel such is the case, says much more about YOU, than anything else.

George Bush agrees with me that there were no WMDs.
That says more about you than anything else I could write.

"On Sept. 9, 2004, in Pennsylvania, Mr. Bush said: "I recognize we didn't find the stockpiles [of weapons] we all thought were there."

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Ahh...it's the media's fault. Of course....it always is with you guys.

ROFL!

Isn't it adorable how in the feelings of the Left, "The Media" can't be at fault?

Of course the reason for that is that "the Media" is "The Left" and for the media to be AT FAULT for "THE LIE", The Left would be equally at fault for the telling, the selling and the believing of THE LIE.

Naturally that the Left being based entirely upon Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance, there's no reason to believe that they'd be so responsible.

What's more, the evidence that tens of thousands of tons of material had been moved to Syria, over the 18 month period, between the US announcing its intention to invade if Iraq did not comply with US and International demands, and the invasion, was also not widely reported..., but remains irrefutable.

Of course it does....so irrefutable that you cited it...oh wait; you didn't.

See how that works kids? The absence of a citation proves "it" ain't true... Unless the left's assertion lacks a citation.

Naturally that such was common knowledge... Is meaningless... So I'll just repost this again (I've posted this from every source on dozens of cites hundreds of times... As have thousands of others and they NEVER seem to be "aware" of it.)

Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldn’t be written just yet.
by Ryan Mauro
June 6, 2010 - 12:08 am


Read more: Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria PJ Media

The rest is self evidently the same obscurant drivel as that refuted above... This rendering it irrelevant.

 

[Claudette]

Ahh...it's the media's fault. Of course....it always is with you guys.

ROFL!

Isn't it adorable how in the feelings of the Left, "The Media" can't be at fault?

Of course the reason for that is that "the Media" is "The Left" and for the media to be AT FAULT for "THE LIE", The Left would be equally at fault for the telling, the selling and the believing of THE LIE.

Naturally that the Left being based entirely upon Deceit, FRAUD and Ignorance, there's no reason to believe that they'd be so responsible.

What's more, the evidence that tens of thousands of tons of material had been moved to Syria, over the 18 month period, between the US announcing its intention to invade if Iraq did not comply with US and International demands, and the invasion, was also not widely reported..., but remains irrefutable.

Of course it does....so irrefutable that you cited it...oh wait; you didn't.

See how that works kids? The absence of a citation proves "it" ain't true... Unless the left's assertion lacks a citation.

Naturally that such was common knowledge... Is meaningless... So I'll just repost this again (I've posted this from every source on dozens of cites hundreds of times... As have thousands of others and they NEVER seem to be "aware" of it.)

Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria
The history books on this issue shouldn’t be written just yet.
by Ryan Mauro
June 6, 2010 - 12:08 am


Read more: Satellite Photos Support Testimony That Iraqi WMD Went to Syria PJ Media

The rest is self evidently the same obscurant drivel as that refuted above... This rendering it irrelevant.

LOL Never mind. Thats just old Shit Ingot. She's a Dem and would probably vote for Jack the Ripper as long as he was a Dem.

Good post and I couldn't agree more.

 

[BluesLegend]

So what you liberal geniuses are saying is that Democrats in congress were even dumber than Bush and fell for it?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Not one... But TWO Congressional approvals...

 

[BluesLegend]

Not one... But TWO Congressional approvals...

After it became clear Americans were in favor of going to war with Iraq the Dem's demanded the second vote so that more of them who had voted no could vote yes. The left loves to leave out the facts.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I know.....you lefties have no idea what "history" is....history for you starts the morning you wake up...everything else is just stories.......

So...for you guys....as Andrew Klavan would say......Back in History Time....on 9/11 mulsim terrorists hijacked 4 jet airliners and flew them into the 2 World Trade Center Towers and the Pentagon and the passengers on one of them crashed the 4th keeping it from crashing into another government building....

Yes...that actually happened.....look it up....I am telling the truth.......

Now....before 9/11 the clinton administration cared more about selling the government of the United States to the highest bidder....mainly China back then....and didn't care about muslim terrorists...they didn't want to offend anyone...and the muslims blew up the Kobar Towers, blew a hole in our ship the Cole, and our embassy in Kenya.......and clinton was forcing women to have sex with him and having sex with interns.....so he was too busy to pay much attention to muslim terrorists...and they grew bolder and more aggressive and then attacked us on 9/11

Leading up to 9/11 we had won a war against Iraq, and to end the war sadaam hussein obama...no...wait...that is just sadaam hussein..........signed a ceasefire agreement in which he said he would stop attacking his neighbors, he had invaded Kuwait, and would allow us to inspect his WMD facilities to make sure he didn't have them or use them again.....because he actually had them and used them against his own people......

Now having paid attention, unlike you guys, to the inspection process.....he would not allow the inspectors to do their jobs....ever.....the whole time he interfered and on just that we should have restarted the war...but clinton was screwing interns and Europe officials were being bribed by sadaam....so no one had the balls to back up the ceasefire agreement....

Oh....and he was targeting our military aircraft over the no fly zone we created to protect the Kurds from being murdered by him....another violation of the ceasefire agreement...but see above for why we just let him do it....

So after 19 muslim terrorists attacked us killin 3,000 Americans...oh...that's right.....you have probably forgotten that already.....so please, go back up to the top and reread the post again.......letting sadaam play his games and build WMDs....which 16 intelligence agencies from around the world said he had....and newly released documents from his goverment showed he was going to do again.....

And to let those weapons be handed off to terrorists...since he was giving money and safe haven to terrorists....could not be tolerated....


And since he was already in violation of the ceasefire agreement many times over...and still refused to allow the weapons inspections to go on unmolested.......it was determined that he couldn't be allowed to exist anymore...not when allowing terrorists in the past to attack us and attack us and attack us...over and over again was just encouraging them to do more and more...

So the grown ups realized he had to be dealt with....and then you lefties used it as an opportunity to bash republicans...because doing that is more important to you than national security....

Then once Iraq and Afghanistan were won and stable..........we foolishly elected a racist, terrorist sympathizing, anti American President who pulled out our troops...following the serial sexual predator bill clinton model of dealing with terrorists to become our policy again....and isis came along and started taking over everything we achieved over there.....


So...that is what happened in a nut shell...yes...I know....you have forgotten what I just posted...so read it again........and when you wake up tomorrow, leave yourselves a note to reread the post so you actually remember 9/11.....

Thanks....

We were attacked on 9/11 because we invaded the ME unjustifiably in 1991, and then proceeded to keep troops in Saudi Arabia needlessly for a decade.

Meddling has consequences.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So what you liberal geniuses are saying is that Democrats in congress were even dumber than Bush and fell for it?

Apparently... Bush the idiot colossus duped all the liberal genius'... including queen genius Hillary.

Gotta love it.

 

[BluesLegend]

So what you liberal geniuses are saying is that Democrats in congress were even dumber than Bush and fell for it?

Apparently... Bush the idiot colossus duped all the liberal genius'... including queen genius Hillary.

Gotta love it.

That's what's great about liberals, they lie so much most of what they say contradicts something else they said.

 

[Theowl32]

Lol.

Liberals are so utterly fucking ruined.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm beginning to believe that liberalism is indeed truly a mental disorder.